Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Governance for sustainability: knowledge integration and multi-actor dimensions in risk management

  • Special Feature: Original Article
  • Sustainability science: bridging the gap between science and society
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustainability has many dimensions, including various aspects of environmental, social and economic sustainability. This paper proposes an analytical framework of risk-related governance for sustainability, based on literature review, focusing on two dimensions—knowledge integration and multi-actor governance. Knowledge integration necessitates wider coverage of predicted and anticipated risks and information on those risks. Multi-actor governance necessitates mechanisms that enable cooperation among actors. The relevance of this analytical framework is then checked using concrete cases of governance for reducing emission from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+), and the possible case of governance for sustainable phosphorus management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a formal definition and the relationship between risk and resilience see Scholz et al. (2011).

  2. Writing of this section was supported by P. Krütli, M. Stauffacher, F.S. Brand, R. Cors and Q.B. Le.

References

  • Agrawala S (1998) Structural and process history of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Clim Change 39:621–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allenby B, Burt D, Dumas M, Heffer P, Hu Z, Scholz RW et al (2011) Global TraPs Workshop I: propositions, sustainable P Summit. In: Paper presented at the Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 5 Feb 2011. Retrieved from http://www.uns.ethz.ch/gt/news/GT_Newsletter_2.pdf

  • Alic JA (1997) Technological change, employment and sustainability. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 55:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage D (2008) Governance and the commons in a multi-level world. Int J Commons 2(1):7–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage D, Berkes F, Doubleday N (2007) Introduction: moving beyond co-management. In: Armitage D, Berkes F, Doubleday N (eds) Adaptive comanagement. UBC Press, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashford NA, Ayers C, Stone RF (1985) Using regulation to change the market for innovation. Harvard Environ Law Rev 9(2):419–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann F (2007) Earth system governance’ as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Glob Environ Change 17:326–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin O, Crona B, Ernston H (2006) Social networks in natural resource management: what is there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecol Soc 11, article no. 2

  • Carlsson B, Stankiewicz R (1991) On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. J Evol Econ 1:93–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Bennett EM (2011) Reconsideration of the planetary boundary for phosphorus. Environ Res Lett 6:014009. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/6/1/014009

  • Corbera E, Schroeder H (2011) Governing and implementing REDD+. Environ Sci Policy 12(2):89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordell D, Drangert J, White S (2009) The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Glob Environ Chang 19(2):292–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • del Rio González P (2009) The empirical analysis of the determinants for environmental technological change: a research agenda. Ecol Econ 68:861–878

    Google Scholar 

  • del Rio P, Carrillo-Hermosilla J, Konnola T (2010) Policy strategies to promote eco-innovation: an integrated framework. J Ind Ecol 14(4):541–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijk M, Yarime M (2010) The emergence of hybrid-electric cars: innovation path creation through co-evolution of supply and demand. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77(8):1371–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing PB, White LJ (1986) Innovation in pollution control. J Environ Econ Manag 13(1):18–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas M, Frossard E, Scholz RW (2011) Modeling biogeochemical processes of phosphorus for global food supply. Chemosphere 84:798–805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eilittä M (2011) The Global TraPs Project. Transdisciplinary processes for sustainable phosphorus management (2010–2015) Multi-stakeholder forum to guide and optimize P use. Zurich and Muscle Shoals: ETH-NSSI and IFDC

  • Ekardt F, Holzapfel N, Ulrich AE, Schnug E, Haneklaus S (2011) Legal perspectives on regulating phosphorus fertilization. Landbauforschung (vTI Agric For Res) 2(61):83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasch J (2008) Climate change: financing global forests. The Eliasch Review, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdmann L, Graedel TE (2011) Criticality of non-fuel minerals: a review of major approaches and analyses. Environ Sci Technol 45:7620–7630

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius C, Folke C, Cundill G, Schultz L (2007) Powerless spectators, coping actors, and adaptive co-managers: a synthesis of the role of communities in ecosystem management. Ecol Soc 12(1), article #29

  • Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-economic systems analyses. Glob Environ Chall 16:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskell G, Allum N, Wagner W, Kronberger N, Torgersen H, Hampel J, Bardes J (2004) GM foods and the misperception of risk perception. Risk Anal 24(1):185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RB (2006) Sustainability assessment: basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 24:170–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goerner SJ, Lietaer B, Ulanowicz RE (2009) Quantifying economic sustainability: implications for free-enterprise theory, policy and practice. Ecol Econ 69:76–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham JD, Wiener JB (1995) Risk vs. risk—tradeoffs in protecting health and the environment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregersen H, El Lakany H, Karsenty A, White A (2010) Does the opportunity cost approach indicate the real cost of REDD+? Rights and realities of paying for REDD+. Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J (2008) Editorial—the multi-level governance challenge of climate change. Environ Sci 4(3):131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guston DH (2008) Innovation policy: not just a jumbo shrimp. Nature 454:940–941

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guston DH, Sarewitz D (2002) Real-time technology assessment. Technol Soc 24:93–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas P (1992) Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Org 46(1):1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe L, Marks G (2003) Unraveling the Central state, but how? Types of muti-level governance. Am Political Sci Rev 97(2):233–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R (1997) Environmental policy and technical change: a comparison of the technological impact of policy instruments. Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Pontoglio S (2011) The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments—a typical case of the blind men and the elephant? Ecol Econ 72:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Parto S, Gibson RB (2005) Governance for sustainable development: moving from theory to practice. Int J Sustain Dev 8:12–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Loorback D, Rotmans J (2007) Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 14:78–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane RO (1984) After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press, NJ

  • Keohane RO, Victor DG (2011) The regime complex for climate change. Perspect Politics 9(1):7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komiyama H, Takeuchi K, Shiroyama H, Mino T (eds) (2011) Sustainability science: a multidisciplinary approach. United Nations University Press, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutli P, Stauffacher M, Flueler T, Scholz RW (2010) Functional-dynamic public participation in technological decision-making: site selection processes of nuclear waste repositories. J Risk Res 13(7):861–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens, P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas C (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science—practice, principles and challenges. Sust Sci 7(Suppl). doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x

  • Lietaer B, Ulanowicz RE, Goerner SJ (2009) Options for managing a systemic bank crisis. Sapiens 2(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Litfin KT (1994) Ozone discourses: science and politics in global environmental cooperation. Columbia University Press, New York

  • Magat WA (1978) Pollution control and technological advance: a dynamic model of the firm. J Environ Econ Manag 5(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magat WA (1979) The effects of environmental regulation on innovation. Law Contemp Probl 43(1):4–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuo M, Matsuda H, Shiroyama H (2011) Global governance. In: Komiyama H, Takeuchi K, Shiroyama H, Mino T (eds) Sustainability science: a multidisciplinary approach. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 220–145

  • Milliman SR, Prince R (1989) Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control. J Environ Econ Manag 17(3):247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR (1994) The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Ind Corp Change 3(1):47–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson D, Adger NW, Brown K (2007) Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:395–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325(5939):419–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Popp D (2003) Pollution control innovations and the Clean Air Act of 1990. J Policy Anal Manag 22:641–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porrúra M, Corbera E, Brown K (2007) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation in developing countries: revisiting the assumptions. Tyndall Centre for climate change research working paper 115. http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/sites/default/files/wp115.pdf

  • Quay R (2010) Anticipatory governance. J Am Plann Assoc 76(4):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Raustiala K, Victor DG (2004) The regime complex for plant genetic resources. Int Org 58:277–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes RAW (1997) Understanding governance: policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes RAW, Marsh D (1992) New directions in the study of policy networks. Eur J Political Res 21:181–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW (2011) Environmental literacy in science and society: from knowledge to decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Tietje O (2002) Embedded case study methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Lang DJ, Wiek A, Walter AI, Stauffacher M (2006) Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning: historical framework and theory. Int J Sustain High Educ 7(3):226–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz RW, Blumer YB, Brand FS (2011) Risk, vulnerability, robustness, and resilience from a decision-theoretic perspective. J Risk Res. doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.634522

  • Schön DA, Rein M (1994) Frame reflection: toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder JJ, Cordell D, Smit AL, Rosemarin A (2010) Sustainable use of phosphorus. Plant research, International University of Waageninge, UR, Waageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiroyama H (1999) Clean & efficient coal use in China and the political economy of international aid. Soc Sci Jpn 16:15–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiroyama H (2002) Technological innovation and diffusion for environmental protection—the roles of public policies, private strategies, and civic actions from an interaction perspective. In: Martha H (ed) Energy market restructuring and the environment—governance and public goods in globally integrated markets. University Press of America, USA, pp 151–181

  • Shiroyama H (2007) The harmonization of automobile environmental standards between Japan, the United States and Europe: the ‘Depoliticizing strategy’ by industry and the dynamics between firms and governments in a transnational context. Pacif Rev 20-3:351–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiroyama H (2011) Technology governance. In: Komiyama H, Takeuchi K, Shiroyama H, Mino T (eds) Sustainability science: a multidisciplinary approach. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 145–157

  • Smil V (2000) Phosphorus in the environment: natural flows and human interferences. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25:53–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MR, Rubin ES, Hounshell DA (2005) Control of SO2 emissions from power plants: a case of induced technological innovation in the US. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 72:697–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson Klein J, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Häberli R, Bill A, Scholz RW, Welti M (eds) (2000) Transdisciplinarity: joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. An effective way for managing complexity. Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Ulanowicz RE (1995) Utricularia’s secret: the advantage of positive feedback in oligotrophic environments. Ecol Model 79:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE, Goerner SJ, Lietaer B, Gomez R (2009) Quantifying sustainability: resilience, efficiency and the return of information theory. Ecol Complex 6:27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich AE (2011) A lake of opportunity: linking phosphorus pollution and resource thinking for food and water security in the Lake Winnipeg Basin. Submission to Perspectives Rachel Carson Center, LMU Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich A, Malley D, Voora V (2009) Peak phosphorus. Opportunity in the making. IISD International Institute for sustainable development. Winnipeg, MB

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Werf G, Morton DC, DeFries RS, Olivier JG, Kasibhatla PS, Jackson RB, Collatz J, Ranaderson JT (2009) CO2 emissions from forest loss. Nat Geosci 2:737–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kauwenbergh SJ (2010) World phosphate rock. Reserves and resources. IFDC International Fertilizer Development Center. Muscle Shoals, AL

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss JP, Smith A, Grin J (2009) Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management. Policy Sci 42:275–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Zemp S, Siegrist M, Walter A (2007) Sustainable governance of emerging technologies—critical constellations in the agent network of nanotechnology. Technol Soc 29(4):388–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarime M (2007) Promoting green innovation or prolonging the existing technology: regulation and technological change in the chlor–alkali industry in Japan and Europe. J Ind Ecol 11(4):117–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yarime M (2009) Public coordination for escaping from technological lock-in: its possibilities and limits in replacing diesel vehicles with compressed natural gas vehicles in Tokyo. J Clean Prod 17(14):1281–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarime M (2010) Understanding sustainability innovation as a social process of knowledge transformation. Nanotechnol Percept 6(3):143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarime M, Shiroyama H, Kuroki Y (2008) The strategy of the Japanese auto industry in developing hybrid and fuel-cell vehicles. In: Mytelka LK, Grant B (eds) Making choices about hydrogen: transport issues for developing countries. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 187–212

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Hideaki Shiroyama, Masaru Yarime & Makiko Matsuo

  2. University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

    Heike Schroeder

  3. ETH, Zurich, Switzerland

    Roland Scholz & Andrea E. Ulrich

Authors
  1. Hideaki Shiroyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masaru Yarime
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Makiko Matsuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Heike Schroeder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Roland Scholz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andrea E. Ulrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideaki Shiroyama.

Additional information

Handled by Kensuke Fukushi, The University of Tokyo, Japan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shiroyama, H., Yarime, M., Matsuo, M. et al. Governance for sustainability: knowledge integration and multi-actor dimensions in risk management. Sustain Sci 7 (Suppl 1), 45–55 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0155-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0155-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation