Ashe, J.W., Van Lierop, R., Cherian, A. (1999). The role of the alliance of small island states (AOSIS) in the negotiation of the United Nations framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC). Politics
(3), 209–220.Google Scholar
Bagozzi, B. E., & Schrodt, P.A. (2013). The Dimensionality of Political News Reports. Presented at the International Studies Association Meeting, San Francisco.
Bailer, S., & Weiler, F. (2014). A political economy of positions in climate change negotiations: economic, structural, domestic, and strategic explanations. Review of International Organizations.
Baille, M., Carman, M.J., Crestani, F. (2009). A topic-based measure of resource description quality for distributed information retrieval. Advances in Informational Retrival.
Bernauer, T. (2013). Climate change politics. Annual Review of Political Science
, 421–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernauer, T., & Böhmelt, T. (2013). National climate policies in international comparison: the climate change cooperation index. Environmental Science & Policy
, 196–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betzold, C. (2010). National climate policies in international comparison: the climate change cooperation index. Politics
(3), 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blei, D.M., Ng, A., Jordan, M. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research
, 993–1022.Google Scholar
Boockmann, B., & Thurner, P.W. (2006). Flexibility provisions in multilateral environmental treaties. International Environmental Agreements
, 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J.M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: logical foundations of constitutional democracy
. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Buchner, B., & Dall’Olio, S. (2005). Russia and the kyoto protocol: the long road to ratification. Transition Studies Review
(2), 349–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burck, J., & Bals, C. (2011). The Climate Change Performance Index: Background and Methodology. Germanwatch and CAN Europe, Berlin/Brussels.
Carlarne, C.P. (2010). Artic dreams and geoengineering wishes: the collateral damage of climate change. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law
, 602–668.Google Scholar
Crowley, K. (2007). Is Australia faking it? The kyoto protocol and the greenhouse gas policy challenge. Global Environmental Politics
(4), 118–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depledge, J. (2006). The opposite of learning: ossification in the climate change regime. Global Environmental Politics
(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ecchia, G., & Mariotti, M. (1998). Coalition formation in international environmental agreements and the role of institutions. European Economic Review
(3-5), 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finus, M. (2008). Game theoretic research on the design of international environmental agreements: insights, critical remarks, and future challenges. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics
, 29–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, P.B. (2011). Shifting global climate governance: creating long-term goals through UNFCCC article 2. PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 8(3).
Genovese, F. (2014). States’ interests at international climate change negotiations: new measures of bargaining positions. Environmental Politics
(4), 610–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrish, S.M., & Blei, D.M. (2011). Predicting legislative roll calls from text. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning.
Grimmer, J. (2010). A Bayesian hierarchical topic model for political texts: measuring expressed agendas in senate press releases. Political Analysis
(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grün, B., & Hornik, K. (2011). Topicmodels: an R package for fitting topic models. Journal of Statistical Software
(13), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyward, M. (2007). Equity and international climate change negotiations: a matter of perspective. Climate Policy
, 518–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaschik, K. (2014). Small states and international politics: climate change, the Maldives and Tuvalu. International Politics
(2), 272–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, M. (1992). Multilateralism with small and large numbers. International Organization
(3), 681–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R.O., & Victor, D.G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics
(1), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R.O., & Nye, J.S. (2001). The club model of multilateral cooperation and problems of democratic legitimacy. In: R. Porter, P. Suavé, A. Subramanian, A.B. Zampetti (Eds.) In Efficiency, equity, legitimacy: the multilateral trading system at the millennium. Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.
Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., Snidal, D. (2001). The Rational Design of International Institutions. International Organization
(4), 761–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuik, O., & Hofkes, M. (2010). Border adjustment for european emissions trading: competitiveness and carbon leakage. Energy Policy
(4), 1741–1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liénou, M., Maître, H., Datcu, M. (2010). Semantic annotation of satellite images using latent dirichlet allocation. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
(1), 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, F. (2009). New world order set agenda in climate talks. The Irish Times.
Najam, A. (2005). Developing countries and global environmental governance: from contestation to participation. International Environmental Agreements
, 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. (1968). The logic of collective action
. New York: Shocken Books.Google Scholar
Oye, K. (1986). Explaining cooperation under anarchy. In: K. Oye (Ed.) In Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Parks, B.C., & Timmons Roberts, J. (2006). Globalization, vulnerabiilty to climate change, and perceived injustice. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal
, 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, E., & Sykes, A.O. (2014). Voting rules in international organizations. Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics
, 1–29.Google Scholar
Quinn, K.M., Monroe, B.L., Colaresi, M., Crespin, M.H., Radev, D.R. (2010). How to analyze political attention with minimal assumptions and costs. American Journal of Political Science
(1), 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qumsiyeh, R., & Ng, Y.-K. (2011). ReadAid: a robust and fully-automated readability assessment tool. In 23rd IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intellegence.
Rice, D. (2012). Measuring the issue content of supreme court opinions through probabilistic topic models. Paper Presented at the 2012 Midwest Political Science Association Conference, Chicago. April 12-15, 2012.
Roberts, M.E., Steward, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G. (Forthcoming). Structural topic models for open ended responses. American Journal of Political Science.
Sasman, C. (2010). Is International Litigation Possible to Fight Climate Change? New Era (Windhoek).
Schunz, S. (2009). After Bonn-2: as the clock is ticking, high-level political intervention will be critical. FACET Commentary No. 16 —July 2009.
Schüssler, E., Rüling, C.-C., Wittneben, B.B.F. (2014). On melting summits: the limitations of field-configuring events as catalysts of change in transnational climate policy. Acadamy of Management Journal
(1), 140–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebenius, J.K. (1983). Negotiation arithmetic: adding and subtracting issues and parties. International Organization
(2), 281–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S. (2010). Copenhagen: a missed opportunity. RSIS Commentaries 13/2010.
Soliz, C. (2011). Complexity and the state of the UNFCCC talks. CWIS: Center for World Indigenous Studies.
Soroos, M.S. (2001). Global environmental politics and the futility of the kyoto process. Global Environmental Politics
(2), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavins, R.N. (2010). Options for the Institutional Venue for International Climate Negotiations. Issue Brief 2010-3, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, May 2010.
Stewart, B.M., & Zhukov, Y.M. (2009). Use of force and civil-military relations in russia: an automated content analysis. Small Wars & Insurgencies
(2), 319–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Financial Express (2013). Climate change: what will warsaw 2013 cast on Paris 2015. The Financial Express (Bangladesh).
UNFCCC (2014). Status of ratification of the convention. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. http://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/status_of_ratification/items/2631.php
Urpelainen, J. (2013). Issue linkage in clean technology cooperation: for better or worse? Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy
(1), 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victor, D.G. (2006). Toward effective international cooperation on climate change: numbers, interests and institutions. Global Environmental Politics
(3), 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victor, D.G. (2011). Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet
. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, U.J. (2001). The design of stable international environmental agreements: economic theory and political economy. Journal of Economic Surveys
(3), 377–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, H., Grundig, F., Zorick, E.R. (2001). Marching at the pace of the slowest: a model of international climate change negotiations. Political Studies
, 438–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, F. (2012). Determinants of bargaining success in the climate change negotiations. Climate Policy
(5), 552–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, E.B., & Jacobson, H.K. (1998). Assessing the record and designing strategies to engage countries. In: E.B. Weiss, & H.K. Jacobson (Eds.) In Engaging countries: strengthening compliance with international environmental accords. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts.
Widerberg, O., & Stenson, D.E. (2013). Climate clubs and the UNFCCC. FORES Study
, 1–52.Google Scholar