Skip to main content
Log in

Happiness, Income, and Beyond

  • Published:
Applied Research in Quality of Life Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This commentary to Carol Graham’s paper deals with the nature of the relationship between income and happiness. Carol Graham focuses her contribution on what I call the positive-coefficient hypothesis in economic theory; which states that, on average, well-being rises with income. The hypothesis was first questioned by Richard Easterlin’s pioneering work and it has captured a lot of attention from happiness researchers during the last decade. My contribution deals with a related hypothesis, which I call the close-relationship hypothesis in economic theory. The hypothesis states that a person’s income is a good predictor of his or her well-being. I show that this hypothesis is rejected by happiness research, and I discuss the implications of this rejection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. Harper-Collins.

  • Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. (2000). Personal income and subjective well-being: A review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duesenberry, J. (1949). Income, saving and the theory of consumer behavior. Harvard University Press.

  • Easterlin, R. (1973). Does money buy happiness? The Public Interest, 30, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth enhance the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David, & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). Stanford University Press.

  • Fuentes, N., & Rojas, M. (2001). Economic theory and subjective well-being: Mexico. Social Indicators Research, 53(3), 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. (2006). Stumbling on happiness. Knopf.

  • Headey, B., & Wooden, M. (2004). The effects of wealth and income on subjective well-being and Ill-being. The Economic Record, 80, S24–S33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Poverty Centre. (2006). What is poverty, poverty in focus.

  • Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. MIT Press.

  • Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, snob and Veblen effects in the theory of consumer’s demand. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 183–207.

  • Leibenstein, H. (1966). Allocative efficiency vs ‘X-efficiency’. The American Economic Review, 56(3), 392–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2006a). Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: Is it a simple relationship? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(4), 467–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2006b). Well-being and the complexity of poverty: A subjective well-being approach. In M. McGillivray, & M. Clarke (Eds.), Understanding human well-being (pp. 182–206). United Nations University Press.

  • Rojas, M. (2006c). Communitarian versus individualistic arrangements in the family: What and whose income matters for happiness? In R. J. Estes (Ed.), Advancing quality of life in a turbulent world (pp. 153–167).

  • Rojas, M. (2007a). The complexity of well-being: A life-satisfaction conception and a domains-of-life approach. In I. Gough, & A. McGregor (Eds.), Researching well-being in developing countries: From theory to research (pp. 259–280). Cambridge University Press.

  • Rojas, M. (2007b). A subjective well-being equivalence scale for Mexico: Estimation and poverty and income-distribution implications. Oxford Development Studies, 35(3), 273–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2007c). Heterogeneity in the relationship between income and happiness: A conceptual referent theory explanation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2008a). Experienced poverty and income poverty in Mexico: A subjective well-being approach. World Development, 36(6), 1078–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2008b). X-Inefficiency in the use of income to attain economic satisfaction. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 2278–2290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2009). Enhancing poverty-abatement programs: A subjective well-being contribution. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4(2), 179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2010). Intra-household arrangements and economic satisfaction: Implications for poverty analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(2), 225–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2011). Poverty and psychological distress in Latin America. Journal of Economic Psychology, forthcoming.

  • Schyns, P. (2008). Income and life satisfaction: A cross-national and longitudinal study. Eburon Publishers.

  • Thaler, R. (1992). Quasi-rational economics. Russel Sage Foundation.

  • Thaler, R. (2000). From homo economics to homo sapiens. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1927). The theory of the leisure class. New York: U.S.A., Vanguard.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariano Rojas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rojas, M. Happiness, Income, and Beyond. Applied Research Quality Life 6, 265–276 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-011-9153-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-011-9153-7

Keywords

Navigation