Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of nonclimatic factors on the habitat prediction of tree species and an assessment of the impact of climate change

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landscape and Ecological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine the influence of nonclimatic factors on predicting the habitats of tree species and an assessment of climate change impacts over a broad geographical extent at about 1 km resolution, we investigated the predictive performance for models with climatic factors only (C-models) and models with climatic and nonclimatic factors (CN-models) using seven tree species in Japan that exhibit different ecological characteristics such as habitat preference and successional traits. Using a generalized additive model, the prediction performance was compared by prediction accuracy [area under the operating characteristic curve (AUC)], goodness of fit, and potential habitat maps. The results showed that the CN-models had higher predictive accuracy, higher goodness of fit, smaller empty habitats, and more finely defined borders of potential habitat than those of the C-models for all seven species. The degree of the total contribution of the nonclimatic variables to prediction performance also varied among the seven species. These results suggest that nonclimatic factors also play an important role in predicting species occurrence when measured to this extent and resolution, that the magnitude of model improvement is larger for species with specific habitat preferences, and that the C-models cannot predict the land-related habitats that exist for almost all species. Climate change impacts were overestimated by C-models for all species. Therefore, C-model outcomes may lead to locally ambiguous assessment of the impact of climate change on species distribution. CN-models provide a more accurate and detailed assessment for conservation planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armonies W, Reise K (2003) Empty habitat in coastal sediments for populations of macrozoobenthos. Helgoland Mar Res 56:276–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der vegetationuskunde. 3 Aufl. Springer, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Coudun C, Gégout J (2007) Quantitative prediction of the distribution and abundance of Vaccinium myrtillus with climatic and edaphic factors. J Veg Sci 18:517–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coudun C, Gégout J, Piedallu C, Rameau J (2006) Soil nutritional factors improve models of plant species distribution: an illustration with Acer campestre (l.) in france. J Biogeogr 33:1750–1763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Development Bureau, Economic Planning Agency of Japan (1967–1978) Land classification maps, 47 volumes

  • Geographical Survay Institute (2000) Digital map 50 m grid (elevation). Nippon-III. Japan Map Center, Tokyo

  • Geographical Survay Institute (2001a) Digital map 50 m grid (elevation). Nippon-I. Japan Map Center, Tokyo

  • Geographical Survay Institute (2001b) Digital map 50 m grid (elevation). Nippon-II. Japan Map Center, Tokyo

  • Geological Survey of Japan (2010) Seamless digital geological map of Japan 1: 200,000. 1 Feb 2010 version. Research Information Database DB084, Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology

  • Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Araújo MB, Virkkala R, Thuiller W, Sykes MT (2006) Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Prog Phys Geog 30:751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horikawa M, Tsuyama I, Matsui T, Kominami Y, Tanaka N (2009) Assessing the potential impacts of climate change on the alpine habitat suitability of Japanese stone pine. Landsc Ecol 24:115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston M (1994) Biological diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez I, Silander JA, Wilson AM, LaFleur N, Tanaka N, Tsuyama I (2009) Multivariate forecasts of potential distributions of invasive plant species. Ecol Appl 19:359–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007a) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • IPCC (2007b) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Iverson LR, Prasad AM (1998) Predicting abundance of 80 tree species following climate change in the eastern united states. Ecol Monogr 68:465–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japan Botanical History Editing Committee (2009) Japan botanical history, vol 1. Japan Forestry Investigation Committee, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Meteorological Agency (1996) Climate normals for Japan. Japan Meteorological Business Support Center, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Meteorological Agency (2004) MRI-RCM20. Global Environment and Marine Department of Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Kira T (1991) Forest ecosystems of east and southeast Asia in a global perspective. Ecol Res 6:185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoto M, Heikkinen RK (2008) Disregarding topographical heterogeneity biases species turnover assessments based on bioclimatic models. Glob Change Biol 14:483–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Pöyry J, Saarinen K (2006) Determinants of the biogeographical distribution of butterflies in boreal regions. J Biogeogr 33:1764–1778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoto M, Virkkala R, Heikkinen RK (2007) The role of land cover in bioclimatic models depends on spatial resolution. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marini L, Prosser F, Klimek S, Marrs RH (2008) Water-energy, land-cover and heterogeneity drivers of the distribution of plant species richness in a mountain region of the european alps. J Biogeogr 35:1826–1839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsui T, Yagihashi T, Nakaya T, Taoda H, Yoshinaga S, Daimaru H, Tanaka N (2004) Probability distributions, vulnerability and sensitivity in Fagus crenata forests following predicted climate changes in japan. J Veg Sci 15:605–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohsawa M (1993) Latitudinal pattern of mountain vegetation zonation in southern and eastern asia. J Veg Sci 4:13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson RG, Dawson TP, Liu C (2004) Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data. Ecography 27:285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org

  • Randin CF, Engler R, Normand S, Zappa M, Zimmermann NE, Pearman PB, Vittoz P, Thuiller W, Guisan A (2009) Climate change and plant distribution: local models predict high-elevation persistence. Glob Change Biol 15:1557–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J, Müller M (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinforma 12:77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanescu C, Herrando S, Paŕamo F (2004) Butterfly species richness in the north-west mediterranean basin: the role of natural and human-induced factors. J Biogeogr 31:905–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka N (2007) PRDB (Phytosociological reléve data base). Environmental change impact team, forestry and forest products research institute. http://www.ffpri.affrc.go.jp/labs/prdb/index.html

  • The Plant List (2010) Version 1. http://www.theplantlist.org/. Accessed 1 Jan 2011

  • Thuiller W, Araújo MB, Lavorel S (2004) Do we need land-cover data to model species distributions in europe? J Biogeogr 31:353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araújo MB, Sykes MT, Prentice IC (2005) Climate change threats to plant diversity in europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:8245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W, Vayreda J, Joan Pino SS, Lavorel S, Gracia C (2003) Large-scale environmental correlates of forest tree distributions in Catalonia (NE Spain). Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:313–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuyama I, Nakao I, Matsui T, Higa M, Horikawa M, Kominami Y, Tanaka N (2011) Climatic controls of a keystone understory species, Sasamorpha borealis, and an impact assessment of climate change in Japan. Ann For Sci 68:689–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virkkala R, Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Leikola N (2005) Distribution patterns of boreal marshland birds: modelling the relationships to land cover and climate. J Biogeogr 32:1957–1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virkkala R, Marmion M, Heikkinen RK, Thuiller W, Luoto M (2010) Predicting range shifts of northern bird species: influence of modelling technique and topography. Acta Oecol 36:269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models. An introduction with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokozawa M, Goto S, Hayashi Y, Seino H (2003) Mesh climate change data for evaluating climate change impacts in Japan under gradually increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration. J Agric Meteorol 59:117–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by a program of the Global Environmental Research of Japan (S-4 and S-8), the Ministry of the Environment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Motoki Higa.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material

Fig. A. 1. Geographic distributions for the four climatic (current and future), four topological, and two geological variables. Regional Climate Model with a spatial resolution of 20 km × 20 km (Japan Meteorological Agency. 2004) for 2081–2100 was used as future climate scenario in this study

Fig. A. 2. Current distribution (I), differences in predicted potential habitats (II, III, IV, V), and changes in habitat types (VI) between climate (C)- and climate–nonclimate (CN)-models under current and future climate scinarios (2081–2100). Maps II and IV were derived from C-models; maps III and V were derived from CN-models

Supplementary material 1 (EPS 464 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (EPS 660 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (EPS 814 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (EPS 1001 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (EPS 933 kb)

Supplementary material 6 (EPS 991 kb)

Supplementary material 7 (EPS 822 kb)

Supplementary material 8 (EPS 677 kb)

Supplementary material 9 (EPS 840 kb)

Supplementary material 10 (EPS 1076 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Higa, M., Tsuyama, I., Nakao, K. et al. Influence of nonclimatic factors on the habitat prediction of tree species and an assessment of the impact of climate change. Landscape Ecol Eng 9, 111–120 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-011-0183-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-011-0183-y

Keywords

Navigation