Abstract
When there exist omitted effects, measurement error, and/or simultaneity in multilevel models, explanatory variables may be correlated with random components, and standard estimation methods do not provide consistent estimates of model parameters. This paper introduces estimators that are consistent under such conditions. By employing generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation techniques in multilevel modeling, the authors present a series of estimators along a robust to efficient continuum. This continuum depends on the assumptions that the analyst makes regarding the extent of the correlated effects. It is shown that the GMM approach provides an overarching framework that encompasses well-known estimators such as fixed and random effects estimators and also provides more options. These GMM estimators can be expressed as instrumental variable (IV) estimators which enhances their interpretability. Moreover, by exploiting the hierarchical structure of the data, the current technique does not require additional variables unlike traditional IV methods. Further, statistical tests are developed to compare the different estimators. A simulation study examines the finite sample properties of the estimators and tests and confirms the theoretical order of the estimators with respect to their robustness and efficiency. It further shows that not only are regression coefficients biased, but variance components may be severely underestimated in the presence of correlated effects. Empirical standard errors are employed as they are less sensitive to correlated effects when compared to model-based standard errors. An example using student achievement data shows that GMM estimators can be effectively used in a search for the most efficient among unbiased estimators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, G.E., Jimerson, S.R., & Whipple, A.D. (2002). Grade retention: Achievement and mental health outcomes. National Association of School Psychologists.
Arellano, M. (1993). On the testing of correlated effects with panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 59, 87–97.
Arellano, M. (2003). Panel data econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–51.
Boardman, A.E., & Murnane, R.J. (1979). Using panel data to improve estimates of the determinants of educational achievement. Sociology of Education, 52, 113–121.
Breusch, T.S., Mizon, G.E., & Schmidt, P. (1989). Efficient estimation using panel data. Econometrica, 57, 695–700.
Diggle, P.J., Heagarty, P., Liang, K.-Y., & Zeger, S.L. (2002). Analysis of longitudinal data (2nd ed.). London: Oxford University Press.
Ebbes, P., Bockenholt, U., & Wedel, M. (2004). Regressor and random-effects dependencies in multilevel models. Statistica Neerlandica, 58, 161–178.
Ecob, R., & Goldstein, H. (1983). Instrumental variable methods for the estimation of test score reliability. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8, 223–241.
Ehrenberg, R.G., & Brewer, D.J. (1994). Do school and teacher characteristics matter? Evidence from high school and beyond. Economics of Education Review, 13, 1–17.
Ehrenberg, R.G., & Brewer, D.J. (1995). Did teachers’ verbal ability and race matter in the 1960s? Coleman revisited. Economics of Education Review, 14, 1–23.
Fielding, A. (2004). The role of the Hausman test and whether higher level effects should be treated as random or fixed. Multilevel Modelling Newsletter, 16, 3–9.
Frees, E.W. (2001). Omitted variables in panel data models. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 29, 1–23.
Frees, E.W. (2004). Longitudinal and panel data: Analysis and applications in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frees, E.W., & Kim, J.-S. (2006). Multilevel model prediction. Psychometrika, 71, 79–104.
Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., & Rubin, D.B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.
Goldhaber, D.D., & Brewer, D.J. (1997). Why don’t schools and teachers seem to matter? Assessing the impact of unobservables on educational productivity. The Journal of Human Resources, 32, 505–523.
Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models (3rd ed.). London: Oxford University Press.
Griliches, Z. (1977). Estimating the returns to schooling. Econometrica, 45, 1–22.
Hanushek, E.A., Kane, J.F., & Rivkin, S.G. (2004). Disruption versus Tiebout improvement: The costs and benefits of switching schools. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1721–1746.
Hausman, J.A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251–1271.
Hausman, J.A., & Taylor, W.E. (1981). Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica, 49, 1377–1398.
Hayashi, F. (2000). Econometrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Im, K.S., Ahn, S.C., Schmidt, P., & Wooldridge, J.M. (1999). Efficient estimation of panel data models with strictly exogenous explanatory variables. Journal of Econometrics, 93, 177–201.
Kiefer, N.M. (1980). Estimation of fixed effects models for time series of cross sections with arbitrary intertemporal covariance. Journal of Econometrics, 14, 195–202.
Kim, J.-S., & Frees, E.W. (2005). Fixed effects estimation in multilevel models. University of Wisconsin working paper. Available at http://research.bus.wisc.edu/jfrees/.
Kim, J.-S., & Frees, E.W. (2006). Omitted variables in multilevel models. Psychometrika, 71, 659–690.
Koop, G., Osiewalski, J., & Steel, M.F.J. (1997). Bayesian efficiency analysis through individual effects: Hospital cost frontiers. Journal of Econometrics, 76, 77–105.
Little, R.J., & Rubin, D.B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
Ludwig, J., & Bassi, L.J. (1999). The puzzling case of school resources and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 385–403.
McCaffrey, D.F., Koretz, D., Louis, T.A., & Hamilton, L. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 67–101.
Natarajan, R., & Kass, R.E. (2000). Reference Bayesian methods for generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 227–237.
Newey, W. (1985). Generalized method of moments specification testing. Journal of Econometrics, 29, 229–256.
Rao, C.R. (1973). Linear statistical inference and its applications (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.
Rice, N., Jones, A., & Goldstein, H. (1997). Multilevel models where the random effects are correlated with the fixed predictors: A conditioned iterative generalised least squares estimator (CIGLS) (Centre for Health Economics Technical Paper 10). York: University of York.
Rothstein, J. (2004). College performance predictions and the SAT. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 297–317.
Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal and structural equation models. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Snijders, T.A.B., & Berkhof, J. (2007). Diagnostic checks for multilevel models. In J. de Leeuw & I. Kreft (Eds.), Handbook of multilevel analysis (in press). New York: Springer.
Snijders, T.A.B., & Bosker, R.J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
Spencer, N., & Fielding, A. (2002). A comparison of modelling strategies for value-added analyses of educational data. Computational Statistics, 17, 103–116.
Steele, F. (2003). Selection effects of source of contraceptive supply in an analysis of contraceptive discontinuation: Multilevel modelling when random effects are correlated with an explanatory variable. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 166, 407–424.
Verbeke, G., Spiessens, B., & Lesaffre, E. (2001). Conditional linear mixed models. The American Statistician, 55, 25–34.
Wooldridge, J.M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the National Academy of Education/Spencer Foundation and the National Science Foundation, grant number SES-0436274. We thank the editor, associate editor, and referees for detailed feedback that helped improve the paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, JS., Frees, E.W. Multilevel Modeling with Correlated Effects. Psychometrika 72, 505–533 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-007-9008-1
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-007-9008-1