Skip to main content
Log in

Economic and Monetary Union – Current Fiscal Disturbances and the Future

  • Published:
International Advances in Economic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At the moment of its setting up the Economic and Monetary Union did not meet the criteria of the optimum currency area. Neither does it today. The crisis of public finance in the eurozone results from the abandonment public finance reforms, lack of consistency in enforcing the decision of the Stability and Growth Pact and, additionally, economic recession and financial crisis. Further functioning of the eurozone will depend on radical reforms of public finance and structural reforms enhancing efficiency of the market as an adjustment mechanism, and competitiveness of economies. The very establishment of the European Stabilization Mechanism and European Financial Stability cannot make up for the above mentioned necessary undertakings. It is important to change the socioeconomic model existing in the EU member countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buiter, W. H. (1995). Macroeconomic policy during a transition to monetary union. CEPR Discussion Paper, August, No 1222.

  • Bukowski, S. (2003). Teoretyczne podstawy i realizacja unii monetarnej krajów członkowskich Wspólnot Europejskich. Szanse i zagrożenia dla Polski, Radom: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Radomskiej.

  • De Grauwe, P. (1997). The economics of monetary integration (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grauwe, P. (2003). Unia walutowa. Warszawa: PWE.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grauwe, P. (2006). What have we learnt about monetary integration since the Maastricht treaty? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(4), 771–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demertzis, M. et al. (2000). Is the European union a natural currency area, or is it held together by policy makers? Welwirtschaftliches Archiv. Review of World Economies, Band 136, Heft 4.

  • Frankel, J. A. & Rose A. K. (1997). The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria. CEPR Discussion Paper Series, No 1473.

  • General Government Data. (2010) European commission directorate general ECFIN.

  • Grubel, H. G. (1970). The theory of optimum currency areas. Canadian Journal of Economics, May.

  • Grubel, H. G. (1977). International economics. Illinois: Homewood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenen, P. B. (1966). Toward a supranational monetary system. Columbia: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenen, P. B. (1970). The theory of optimum currency areas: An eclectic view. In R. A. Mundell & A. K. Swoboda (Eds.), Monetary problems of the international economy. Chicago: Chicago University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R. (1999). Currencies and crises. Cambridge: The MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R., & Obstfeld, M. (2000). International economics. Theory and policy (5th ed.). Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnifico, G. (1971). European monetary unification for balanced growth: A new approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, T. (1995). A degree of German doubt. Financial Times, April 21st.

  • McKinnon, R. I. (1963). Optimum currency areas. The American Economic Review, 53, September.

  • Mortimer-Lee, P. (2001). Czy Euroland może funkcjonować przy jednej stopie procentowej? In P. Temperton (Ed.), Euro. Wspólna waluta. Feldberg: Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundell, R. (1961). A theory of optimum currency areas. The American Economic Review, 53, September.

  • Mundell, R. (2003). Commentary on EMU. In Submissions on EMU from Leading Academics, EMU Study, H M Treasury, London, www.hmt.treasury.gov.uk.

  • Oręziak, L. (2003). Euro. Nowy pieniądz. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

  • Sapiro, A. et al. (2003). An agenda for a growing Europe. Making the EU economic system deliver. Report of an independent high-level study group established on the initiative of the President of European Commission, Brussels, July.

  • Snider, D. A. (1967). Optimum adjustment process and currency areas. Essays in International Finance, No 62. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Global Competitiveness Report (2010–2011). www.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2010-11.pdf.

  • Tyrie, A. (1995). A political economy of economic and monetary union. In M. Baldassari & R. Mundell (Eds.), Building the New Europe, Vol. 1: The single market and monetary unification. Rome: St. Martin.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Riet, Ad (2010). Euro area fiscal policies and the crisis. ECB: Occasional Paper Series, No 109/April.

  • Williamson, J. (1990). What Washington means by policy reform. In J. Williamson (Ed.), Latin American adjustment: How much has happened? Washington: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. E. (1973). European monetary union and the U.K.—A cost benefit analysis. Surrey Papers in Economics No 3, September, Guildford: University of Surrey www.bis.org/statistics/conststats.htm, table 9 D

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sławomir I. Bukowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bukowski, S.I. Economic and Monetary Union – Current Fiscal Disturbances and the Future. Int Adv Econ Res 17, 274–287 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-011-9310-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-011-9310-7

Keywords

JEL

Navigation