Skip to main content
Log in

Determining a Modified Currency Board's Two-Period Exchange Rate Strategy

  • Published:
International Advances in Economic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Is it preferable for a modified currency board (MCB) to disguise its true characteristics and preferences and renege later? This paper analyzes a model in which a MCB determines its first-period exchange rate strategy to maximize a two-period welfare function. The inflation rate anchored by a classical currency board (CCB) is always a benchmark to the MCB in its first period decision. If the benchmark inflation rate is either sufficiently low or sufficiently high, the MCB chooses the optimal exchange rate in both periods without playing a credibility game over time. However, if the benchmark is at a moderate level, a strategy of overtly deceiving the public by pretending to be a CCB is shown to be superior to a strategy of concealing through policy randomization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Backus, David; Driffill, John. “Inflation and Reputation,” American Economic Review, 75, 3, June 1985, pp. 530–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baliño, T.; Enoch, C. “Currency Board Arrangements: Issues and Experiences,” IMF Occasional Paper 151, Washington, District of Columbia: International Monetary Funds, 1997.

  • Barro, Robert J. “Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy with Incomplete Information,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 17, 1, January 1986, pp. 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, Robert J.; Gordon, David B. “Rules, Discretion and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, 1, July 1983, pp. 101–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batiz, Luiz A. Rivera; Sy, Amadou N. R. “Currency Boards, Credibility, and Macroeconomic Behavior,” IMF Working Paper, WP/00/97, Washington, District of Columbia: International Monetary Funds, 2000.

  • Bernanke, Ben S.; Mishkin, Frederick S. “Inflation Targeting: A New Framework for Monetary Policy?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 2, Spring 1997, pp. 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprio, Gerald Jr.; Dooley, Michael; Leipziger, Danny; Walsh, Carl. “The Lender of Last Resort Function under a Currency Board: The Case of Argentina,” Policy Research Working Paper Series: 1648, Washington, District of Columbia: The World Bank, 1999, pp. 625–50.

  • Corden, W. Max. Too Sensational: On the Choice of Exchange Rate Regimes, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delong, J. Bradford. Macroeconomics, Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, Charles; Gulde, Anne-Marie. “Making a Currency Board Operational,” IMF Paper on Policy Analysis and Assessment, PPAA/97/10, Washington, District of Columbia: International Monetary Funds, 1997.

  • Ghosh, Atish. R.; Gulde, Anne-Marie; Wolf, Holger C. “Currency Boards: The Ultimate Fix?”, IMF Working Paper, WP/98/8, Washington, District of Columbia: International Monetary Funds, 1998.

  • Gulde, Anne-Marie. “The Role of the Currency Board in Bulgaria's Stabilization,” IMF Policy Discussion Paper, PDP/99/3, Washington, District of Columbia: International Monetary Funds, 1999.

  • Hanke, Steve H.; Jonung, Lars; Schuler, Kurt. Russian Currency and Finance: A Currency Board Approach to Reform, London and New York: Routledge, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • HKMA. Review of Currency Board Arrangements in Hong Kong, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), 1998.

  • Kydland, F. E.; Prescott, E. C. “Rules Rather Than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans,” Journal of Political Economy, 85, 3, June 1977, pp. 473–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, Maurice; Taylor, Alan. “The Great Depression as a Watershed: International Capital Mobility over the Long Run,” in The Defining Moment: The Great Depression and the American Economy in the Twentieth Century, Bordo, M. D.; Goldin, C. D.; and White, E. N. (eds.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998, pp. 353–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, Dani. “How Far Will International Economic Integration Go?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 1, Winter 2000, pp. 177–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, Maria Luiza Falcão. “The Rules-versus-Discretion Debate Revisited: What Can Be Learnt from Argentina's Quasi-Currency Board Regime?” Social and Economic Studies, 46, 1, March 1997, pp. 111–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Ying. “A Modified Currency Board System: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 15, 4, October 2005, pp. 353–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarazaga, Carlos E. “Argentina, Mexico and Currency Boards: Another Case of Rules versus Discretion,” Economic Review (Forth Quarter), Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, 1995.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, Y. Determining a Modified Currency Board's Two-Period Exchange Rate Strategy. Int Adv Econ Res 11, 347–357 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-005-2273-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-005-2273-9

JEL

Navigation