Abstract
There has been an increasing interest in urban forests and the levels of biodiversity they contain. Currently there are no spatially explicit maps of tree species richness in urban areas. This research tests and identifies GIS and remote sensing metrics (climate, area, productivity, three-dimensional structure) hypothesized to be associated with species richness in native forests and identifies methods that can be applied to predict and map tree species richness in cities. We quantified tree species richness, floristic composition, and structure in 28 1-ha plots in the city of Los Angeles. Climate and remote sensing metrics from high-resolution aerial imagery (10 cm), QuickBird (60 cm), Landsat (30 m), MODIS (250 m), and airborne lidar (2 m) were collected for each plot. There were 1208 individual stems and 108 trees identified to species. Species richness ranged from 2 to 31 species per ha and averaged 17 species per ha. Tree canopy cover from QuickBird explained the highest portion of variance (54%) in tree species richness followed by NDVI from Landsat (42%). Tree species richness can be higher in residential urban forests than native forests in the United States. Spatially explicit species richness maps at 1 ha can be created and tested for cities in order to identify both hotspots and coldspots of tree species richness and changes in species richness over time.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
24 January 2017
An erratum to this article has been published.
References
Barbour MG, Keeler-Wolf T, Schoenherr AA (2007) Terrestrial vegetation of California. University of California Press, Berkeley
Bergen KM, Goetz SJ, Dubayah RO, Henebry GM, Hunsaker CT, Imhoff ML, Nelson RF, Parker GG, Radeloff VC (2009) Remote sensing of vegetation 3-D structure for biodiversity and habitat: review and implications for lidar and radar spaceborne missions. J Geophys Res 114:G00E06. doi:10.1029/2008JG000883
Clarke LW, Jenerette GD, Davilia A (2013) The luxury of vegetation and the legacy of tree biodiversity in Los Angeles, CA. Land Urb Plan 116:48–59. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.006
Clarkson BD, Wehi PM, Brabyn LK (2007) A spatial analysis of indigenous cover patterns and implications for ecological restoration in urban centres, New Zealand. Urban Ecosyst 10:441–457. doi:10.1007/s11252-007-0035-6
Clinebell RR, Phillips OL, Gentry AH, Stark N, Zuuring H (1995) Prediction of neotropical tree and liana species richness from soil and climatic data. Biod Cons 4:56–90. doi:10.1007/BF00115314
Conduit R, Hubbell SP, Lafrankie JV, Sukumar R, Manokaran N, Foster RB, Ashton PS (1996) Species-area and species-individual relationships for tropical trees: a comparison of three 50-ha plots. J Ecol 84:549–562. doi:10.2307/2261477
Currie DJ, Paquin V (1987) Large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of trees. Nature 329:326–327. doi:10.1038/329326a0
Evans KL, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2005) Species–energy relationships at the macroecological scale: a review of the mechanisms. Biol Rev 80:1–25. doi:10.1017/S1464793104006517
Field R, Hawkins BA, Cornell HV, Currie DJ, Diniz-Filho AF, Guégan JF, Kaufman DM, Kerr JT, Mittelbach GG, Oberdorff T, O’Brien EM, Turner JRG (2009) Spatial species-richness gradients across scales: a meta-analysis. J Biogeog 36:132–147. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01963.x
Gaston KJ (2000) Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405:220–227. doi:10.1038/35012228
Gillespie TW, Pincetl S, Brossard S, Smith J, Saatchi S, Pataki D, Saphores JD (2012) A time series of urban forestry in Los Angeles. Urban Ecosyst 15:233–246. doi:10.1007/s11252-011-0183-6
Gillespie TW, Willis K, Ostermann-Kelm S (2014) Spaceborne remote sensing of the world’s protected areas. Prog Phys Geogr 31:235–260. doi:10.1177/0309133314561648
Godefroid S, Koedam N (2007) Urban plant species patterns are highly driven by density and function of built-up areas. Landscape Ecol 22:1227–1239. doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9102-x
Goetz S, Steinberg D, Dubayah R, Blair B (2007) Laser remote sensing of canopy habitat heterogeneity as a predictor of bird species richness in an eastern temperate forest, USA. Remote Sens Environ 108:254–263. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.016
Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu JG, Bai XM, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760. doi:10.1126/science.1150195
Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R et al (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342:850–853. doi:10.1126/science.1244693
Hope D, Gries C, Zhu WX, Fagan WF, Redman CL, Grimm NB, Nelson AL, Martin C, Kinzig A (2003) Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 100:8788–8792. doi:10.1073/pnas.1537557100
Jenerette GD, Miller G, Buyantuyev A, Pataki DE, Gillespie TW, Pincetl S (2013) Urban vegetation and income segregation in drylands: a synthesis of seven metropolitan regions in the southwestern United States. Environ Res Lett 8:044001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044001
Kowarik I (2011) Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environ Pollution 159:1974–1983. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02.022
Levin N, Shmida A, Levanoni O, Tamari H, Kark S (2007) Predicting mountain plant richness and rarity from space using satellite-derived vegetation indices. Divers Distrib 13:692–703. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00372.x
MacArthur RH, MacArthur JW (1961) On bird species diversity. Ecology 42:594–598. doi:10.2307/1932254
McPherson GE, Simpson JR, Xiao Q, Wu C (2011) Million trees Los Angeles canopy cover and benefit assessment. Land Urban Plan 99:40–50. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.011
Nowak DJ, Crane DE (2002) Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environ Pollution 116:381–389. doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00214-7
Nowak DJ, Rowntree RA, McPherson GE, Sisinni SM, Kerkmann ER, Stevens JC (1996) Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover. Land Urban Plan 36:49–57. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00324-6
Penman J, Gytarsky M, Hiraishi T, Krug T, Kruger, D, Pipatti R. (2003). Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
Pettorelli N (2013) The normalized difference vegetation index. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Pincetl S, Prabhu S, Gillespie TW, Jenerette GD, Pataki DE (2013) Evolution of tree nursery offerings and the cultivated urban forest of Los Angeles. Land Urban Plan 118:10–17. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.05.002
Ploton P, Pélissier R, Proisy C, Flavenot T, Barbier N, Rai S, Couteron P (2012) Assessing aboveground tropical forest biomass using Google earth canopy images. Ecol Appl 22:993–1003. doi:10.1890/11-1606.1
Qian H, Wiens JJ, Zhang J, Zhang Y (2015) Evolutionary and ecological causes of species richness patterns in north American angiosperm trees. Ecography 38:241–250. doi:10.1111/ecog.00952
Rocchini D, Balkenhol N, Carter GA et al (2010) Remotely sensed spectral heterogeneity as a proxy of species diversity: recent advances and open challenges. Ecol Inform 5:318–329. doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.06.001
Rocha AV, Shaver GR (2009) Advantages of a two band EVI calculated from solar and photosynthetically active radiation fluxes. Agric Forest Meteor 149:150–1563. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.03.016
Tzoulas K, James P (2009) Making biodiversity measures accessible to non-specialists: an innovative method for rapid assessment of urban biodiversity. Urban Ecosyst 13:113–127. doi:10.1007/s11252-009-0107-x
Acknowledgments
We thank the National Science Foundation (NSF-HSD-0624177) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA-G2006-STAR-H1) for funding this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The original version of this article was revised: One of the authors name was incorrectly listed as “Darrell E. Jenerette” and should be corrected as “G. Darrel Jenerette”.
An erratum to this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0646-5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gillespie, T.W., de Goede, J., Aguilar, L. et al. Predicting tree species richness in urban forests. Urban Ecosyst 20, 839–849 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0633-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0633-2