Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fiscal Decentralization and Life Satisfaction: Evidence from Urban China

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of government structure on citizen welfare remains an open question. This study uses a repeated cross-section data (China General Social Survey) of Chinese urban households to test the hypothesis that fiscal decentralization increases individual welfare. The data used were collected in 2003, 2005 and 2006 and covered most of the provinces in China. We construct two measures of fiscal decentralization: one is based on revenue and the other on expenditure. Then we apply ordered Probit regression to investigate the impact of decentralization on individual life satisfaction after controlling a rich set of individual characteristics and several important macroeconomic factors. We find that greater revenue decentralization increases life satisfaction, a finding that is quite robust across different specifications. We also find that revenue decentralization is more important to the underdeveloped western region, the private sector employees and homeowners. In terms of income distribution, both the rich and the poor gain from revenue decentralization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akai, N., & Sakata, M. (2002). Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: Evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States. Journal of Urban Economics, 52(1), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderman, H. (1998). Social assistance in Albania: Decentralization and targeted transfers. LSMS working paper no. 134. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 2009–2042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azfar, O., Gurgur, T., Kahkonen, S., Lanyi, A., & Meagher, P. (2000). Decentralization and governance: An empirical investigation of public service delivery in the Philippines. College Park: IRIS, University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2003). Poverty alleviation effort of West Bengal Panchayats. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(9), 965–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2007). The bigger the better? Evidence of the effect of government size on life satisfaction around the world. Public Choice, 130(3), 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2008). On decentralization and life satisfaction. Economics Letters, 99(1), 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., & Oates, W. E. (1987). Assistance for the poor in a federal system. Journal of Public Economics, 32(3), 307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C. K., & Leung, K. K. (2007). Enhancing life satisfaction by government accountability in China. Social Indicators Research, 82(3), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoodi, H., & Zou, H. (1998). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: A cross-country study. Journal of Urban Economics, 43(2), 244–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2006). Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of Happiness. American Economic Review, 91(1), 335–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., & Oswald, A. J. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 809–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. David & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramovitz. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebel, R. D., & Yilmaz, S. (2002). On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization. Policy Research Working Paper Series 2809. The World Bank.

  • Enikolopov, R., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2007). Decentralization and political institutions. Journal of Public Economics, 91(11–12), 2261–2290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faguet, J. P. (2004). Does decentralization increase responsiveness to local needs? Evidence from Bolivia. Journal of Public Economics, 88(3–4), 867–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of Happiness. The Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2002). Decentralization and corruption: Evidence from U.S. federal transfer programs. Public Choice, 113(1–2), 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110(446), 918–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well-being, social capital, and public sector: What’s new? The Economic Journal, 116(510), C34–C45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huther, J., & Shah, A. (1998). Applying a simple measure of good governance to the debate on fiscal decentralization. Policy research working paper no. 1894. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Jin, H., Qian, Y., & Weingast, B. (2005). Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: Federalism, Chinese Style. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9–10), 1719–1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaleghian, P. (2003). Decentralization and public services: The case of immunization. Policy research working paper no. 2989. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Knight, J., & Gunatilaka, R. (2011). Does economic growth raise happiness in China? Oxford Development Studies, 39(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K. J., & Liu, P. W. (2013). Socio-economic inequalities in happiness in China and U.S. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0283-1.

  • Lin, J., & Liu, Z. (2000). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in China. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 49(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L. (2006). Quality of life as a social representation in China: A qualitative study. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 217–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McNab, R. M. (2003). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth. World Development, 31(9), 1597–1616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meloche, J., Vaillancourt, F., & Yilmaz, S. (2004). Decentralization or fiscal autonomy? What does really matter? Effects on growth and public sector size in European transition countries. Policy research working paper no. 3254. World Bank.

  • Musgrave, R. A. (1971). Economics of fiscal Federalism. Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business, 10(4), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakerson, R. J. (1999). Governing local public economies, creating the Civic Metropolis. Oakland, CA: ICS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shek, D. T. L. (2010). Introduction: Quality of life of Chinese people in a changing world. Social Indicators Research, 95(3), 357–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelker, M. (2005). Fiscal decentralization: Efficiency vs. redistribution? An institutional feature to resolve the trade-off, paper prepared for Annual Meeting of the International Society of New Institutional Economics (ISNIE).

  • Shu, X. L., & Zhu, Y. F. (2009). The quality of life in China. Social Indicators Research, 92(2), 191–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, R., Nielsen, I., & Zhai, Q. G. (2010). Personal well-being in urban China. Social Indicators Research, 95(2), 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, F., & Xiao, J. J. (2012). Perceived social policy fairness and subjective wellbeing: Evidence from China. Social Indicators Research, 107(1), 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen, U. (2000). Fiscal federalism in western European and selected other countries: Centralization or decentralization? What is better for economic growth? DIW discussion paper no. 224. Berlin: DIW.

  • Treisman, D. (2002). Decentralization and the quality of government, UCLA: manuscript, available at http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/treisman/Papers/DecandGovt.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2013.

  • West, L., & Wong, C. (1995). Fiscal decentralization and growth regional disparities in rural China: Some evidence in the provision of social services. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 11(4), 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, D., Zou, H., & Davoodi, H. (1999). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in the United States. Journal of Urban Economics, 45(2), 228–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T., & Zou, H. (1997). Fiscal decentralization, the composition of public spending, and regional growth in India. CEMA working papers no. 521. http://ideas.repec.org/p/cuf/wpaper/521.html#cites.

  • Zhang, T., & Zou, H. (1998). Fiscal decentralization, public spending and economic growth in China. Journal of Public Economics, 67(2), 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zodrow, G. R., & Mieszkowski, P. (1986). Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the under provision of local public goods. Journal of Urban Economics, 19(3), 356–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. China Academy of Public Finance and Public Policy, Central University of Finance and Economics, No. 39 South College Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, China

    Song Gao, Xiangyi Meng & Li Zhang

Authors
  1. Song Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiangyi Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Li Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiangyi Meng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gao, S., Meng, X. & Zhang, L. Fiscal Decentralization and Life Satisfaction: Evidence from Urban China. Soc Indic Res 119, 1177–1194 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0552-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0552-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation