Time Use and Subjective Well-Being in France and the U.S.
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Social scientists and policymakers have long been interested in comparing the subjective well-being (SWB) of populations over time and across countries, although SWB is hard to define and measure. Nevertheless, attempts have been made to rank countries based on SWB (e.g., Veenhoven 1996; OECD 2005). Cross-country data have also been used to study the effect on SWB of public policies, economic conditions and institutions (e.g., Alesina et al. 2002; Frey and Stutzer 2002; Blanchflower 2007). The most common measure of SWB in these studies is based on a question that asks respondents about their overall level of life satisfaction or happiness. Other measures of SWB include ecological momentary assessment (EMA; Stone et al. 1999) and the day reconstruction method (DRM; Kahneman et al. 2004). These measures collect individuals’ time use and affective experience over time, either using real-time data collection or diary recall methods. An advantage of such time-based SWB data is that they co
- Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2007). Measuring trends in leisure: The allocation of time over five decades. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 969–1006.
- Alesina, A. F., Glaeser, E. L., & Sacerdote, B. (2002). Why doesn’t the US have a European-style welfare state? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 187–277.
- Blanchflower, D. G. (2007). Is unemployment more costly than inflation? Cambridge, MA: NBER Working Paper No. W13505.
- Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness & economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Gershuny, J., & Halpin, B. (1996). Time use, quality of life and process benefits. In A. Offer (Ed.), In pursuit of the quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Juster, F. T. (1985). Preferences for work and leisure. In F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford (Eds.), Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 333–351). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
- Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.
- Kahneman, D., Krueger, A., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method (DRM). Science, December 3, pp. 1776–1780.
- Krueger, A. B. (2007). Are we having more fun yet? Categorizing and evaluating changes in time allocation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 38(2007-2), 193–218.
- Krueger, A., Kahneman, D., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2008). National time accounting: The currency of life,” mimeo., Princeton University. Available at www.krueger.princeton.edu/nta2.pdf.
- Krueger, A., & Stone, A. (2008). Assessment of pain: A community-based diary survey in the USA. The Lancet, 371, 1519–1525.
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005). Society at a Glance: OECD Social Indicators—2005 Edition.
- Robinson, J., & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178. CrossRef
- Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S. S., & DeVries, M. W. (1999). Ecological momentary assessment. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 26–39). New York: Russell-Sage.
- Veenhoven, Ruut. (1996). Happy life-expectancy: A comprehensive measure of quality-of-life in nations. Social Indicators Research, 39, 1–58. CrossRef
- Time Use and Subjective Well-Being in France and the U.S.
Social Indicators Research
Volume 93, Issue 1 , pp 7-18
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA
- 2. Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales and Centre National de la Reserche Scientifique, Paris, France
- 3. University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- 4. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- 5. Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA