Skip to main content
Log in

On arguing for the existence of god as a synthesis between realism and anti-realism

  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines a somewhat neglected argument for the existence of God which appeals to the divine perspective as a way of reconciling the conflicting claims of realism and anti-realism. Six representative examples are set out (Berkeley, Ferrier, T. H. Green, Josiah Royce, Gordon Clark and Michael Dummett), reasons are considered why this argument has received less attention than it might, and a brief sketch given of the most promising way in which it might be developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Aquinas. De Veritatae.

  • Armour, L. (1991–1992). Error and the Idealists. Philosophia, 21, 3–23.

  • Augustine. Freedom of the Will.

  • Beards, A. (2007). Dummett: Philosophy and Religion. In R. B. Auxier & L. E. Hahn (Eds.), The Philosophy of Michael Dummett (Library of Living Philosophers). Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing Company.

  • Bennett J. (1965) Berkeley and God. Philosophy 40(153): 207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley, G. (1710). The Principles of human understanding.

  • Berkeley, G. (1713). Three dialogues between Hylas and Philonus (page numbers Luce/Jessop Collected Works).

  • Botterill G. (2007) God and the First Person in Berkeley. Philosophy 82(1): 87–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark G. (1952) A Christian view of men and things. Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett M. (1994) Reply to McGuiness. In: McGuinness B., Olivieri G. (eds) The philosophy of Michael Dummett. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett M. (2006) Thought and reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dummett M. (2010) The Future and Nature of Philosophy. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, J. F. (1842 [1883]). Berkeley and idealism. In Philosophical works (Vol. III, pp. 291–347). Edinburgh: Blackwood.

  • Ferrier J.F. (1854) Institutes of metaphysics. Blackwood, Edinburgh

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, J. F. (1856 [1866]). Appendix to Institutes of Metaphysics’ in his Lectures on Greek Philosophy and Philosophical Remains. Edinburgh: Blackwood.

  • Green, T. H. (1883). Prolegomena to ethics (5th ed., 1907). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Green, T. H. (c.1874–76 [1885–88]). Lectures on kant. In R. L. Nettleship (Ed.), Works of T. H. Green (Vol. II, pp. 1–155). London: Longmans Green.

  • Green, T. H. (c.1874–75 [1885–88]). Lectures on logic. In R. L. Nettleship (Ed.), Works of T. H. Green (Vol. II, pp. 157–306). London: Longmans Green.

  • Jacquette D. (1985) Berkeley’s continuity argument. The Journal of Religion 65(1): 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefe J. (2007) James Ferrier and the theory of ignorance. The Monist 90: 297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1714). Monadology.

  • Mander W. J. (1998) Royce’s argument for the absolute. Journal of the History of Philosophy 36(3): 443–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander W.J. (2006) In defence of the eternal consciousness. In: Dimova–Cookson M., Mander W.J. (eds) T. H. Green: Ethics, metaphysics and political philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris T. V., Menzel C. H. (1986) Absolute creation. American Philosophical Quarterly 23(4): 353–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, B. (2007). Review of Thought and reality. Ars Disputandi 7. http://www.ArsDisputandi.org.

  • Nash R.H. (1988) Faith and reason. Zondervan, Grand Rapids, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry R. B. (1910) The egocentric predicament. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Method 7(1): 5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga A. (1982) How to be an anti-realist. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 56(1): 47–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashdall H. (1902) Personality: Human and divine. In: Sturt H. (Ed.) Personal idealism. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce, J. (1885 [1913]). The religious aspect of philosophy (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  • Royce J. (1892) The spirit of modern philosophy. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce, J. (1887 [1897]). The Conception of God (2nd enlarged edition).

  • Royce, J. (1899–1901). The world and the individual. New York: Macmillan.

  • Tyler, C. (2010). The liberal socialism of T. H.Green, Vol. I (The Metaphysics of Self-Realisation and Freedom). Exeter: Imprint Academic.

  • Wainwright W.J. (2010) Jonathan Edwards, God, and ‘particular minds’. International Journal of Philosophy of Religion 68(1): 201–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. J. Mander.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mander, W.J. On arguing for the existence of god as a synthesis between realism and anti-realism. Int J Philos Relig 74, 99–115 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-011-9295-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-011-9295-4

Keywords

Navigation