Quality of Life Research

, Volume 22, Issue 7, pp 1819–1830

Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS®) Spanish-language physical functioning items

Authors

    • Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of MedicineUCLA School of Medicine
  • Karen L. Spritzer
    • Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of MedicineUCLA School of Medicine
  • Leo S. Morales
    • Group Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative
    • Department of Health ServicesUniversity of Washington
  • Ron D. Hays
    • Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of MedicineUCLA School of Medicine
    • RAND
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0292-6

Cite this article as:
Paz, S.H., Spritzer, K.L., Morales, L.S. et al. Qual Life Res (2013) 22: 1819. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0292-6

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the equivalence of the PROMIS® physical functioning item bank by language of administration (English versus Spanish).

Methods

The PROMIS® wave 1 English-language physical functioning bank consists of 124 items, and 114 of these were translated into Spanish.

Analysis

Item frequencies, means and standard deviations, item-scale correlations, and internal consistency reliability were calculated. The IRT assumption of unidimensionality was evaluated by fitting a single-factor confirmatory factor analytic model. IRT threshold and discrimination parameters were estimated using Samejima’s Graded Response Model. DIF by language of administration was evaluated.

Results

Item means ranged from 2.53 (SD = 1.36) to 4.62 (SD = 0.82). Coefficient alpha was 0.99, and item-rest correlations ranged from 0.41 to 0.89. A one-factor model fits the data well (CFI = 0.971, TLI = 0.970, and RMSEA = 0.052). The slope parameters ranged from 0.45 (“Are you able to run 10 miles?”) to 4.50 (“Are you able to put on a shirt or blouse?”). The threshold parameters ranged from −1.92 (“How much do physical health problems now limit your usual physical activities (such as walking or climbing stairs)?”) to 6.06 (“Are you able to run 10 miles?”). Fifty of the 114 items were flagged for DIF based on an R2 of 0.02 or above criterion. The expected total score was higher for Spanish- than English-language respondents.

Conclusions

English- and Spanish-speaking subjects with the same level of underlying physical function responded differently to 50 of 114 items. This study has important implications in the study of physical functioning among diverse populations.

Keywords

PROMIS® item banksIRTPhysical function Spanish items

Supplementary material

11136_2012_292_MOESM1_ESM.doc (222 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 222 kb)
11136_2012_292_MOESM2_ESM.doc (204 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 204 kb)
11136_2012_292_MOESM3_ESM.doc (44 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOC 44 kb)
11136_2012_292_MOESM4_ESM.doc (173 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOC 173 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012