On the (not so) constant proportional trade-off in TTO
The linear and power QALY models require that people in Time Trade-off (TTO) exercises sacrifice the same proportion of lifetime to obtain a health improvement, irrespective of the absolute amount. However, evidence on these constant proportional trade-offs (CPTOs) is mixed, indicating that these versions of the QALY model do not represent preferences. Still, it may be the case that a more general version of the QALY model represents preferences. This version has the property that people want to sacrifice the same proportion of utilities of lifetime for a health improvement, irrespective of the amount of this lifetime.
We use a new method to correct TTO scores for utility of life duration and test whether decision makers trade off utility of duration and quality at the same rate irrespective of duration.
We find a robust violation of CPTO for both uncorrected and corrected TTO scores. Remarkably, we find higher values for longer durations, contrary to most previous studies. This represents the only study correcting for utility of life duration to find such a violation.
It seems that the trade-off of life years is indeed not so constantly proportional and, therefore, that health state valuations depend on durations.
- Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108. CrossRef
- Lamers, L. M., McDonnell, J., Stalmeier, P. F. M., Krabbe, P. F. M., & Busschbach, J. J. (2006). The Dutch tariff: Results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Economics, 15(10), 1121–1132. CrossRef
- Bleichrodt, H. (2002). A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities. Health Economics, 11(5), 447–456. CrossRef
- Bleichrodt, H., & Johannesson, M. (1997). The validity of QALYs: An empirical test of constant proportional tradeoff and utility independence. Medical Decision Making, 17, 21–32. CrossRef
- Dolan, P., & Stalmeier, P. F. M. (2003). The validity of time trade-off values in calculating QALYs: constant proportional time trade-off versus the proportional heuristic. Journal of Health Economics, 22(3), 445–458. CrossRef
- Van der Pol, M., & Roux, L. (2005). Time preference bias in time trade-off. European Journal of Health Economics, 6, 107–111. CrossRef
- Stiggelbout, A. M., Kiebert, G. M., Kievit, J., Leer, J. W., Habbema, J. D., & De Haes, J. C. (1995). The “utility” of the time trade-off method in cancer patients: feasibility and proportional trade-off. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48(10), 1207–1214. CrossRef
- Sackett, D. L., & Torrance, G. W. (1978). The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public. Journal of Chronic Disease, 31, 697–704. CrossRef
- Bleichrodt, H., Pinto, J. L., & Abellan-Perpinan, J. M. (2003). A consistency test of the time trade-off. Journal of Health Economics, 22(6), 1037–1052. CrossRef
- Attema, A. E., Bleichrodt, H., & Wakker, P. P. (2010). Measuring discounting and QALYs more easily and reliably, Working paper. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
- Bleichrodt, H., & Gafni, A. (1996). Time preference, the discounted utility model and health. Journal of Health Economics, 15(1), 49–66. CrossRef
- Pliskin, J. S., Shepard, D., & Weinstein, M. C. (1980). Utility functions for life years and health status. Operations Research, 28, 206–224. CrossRef
- Doctor, J. N., & Miyamoto, J. M. (2003). Deriving quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from constant proportional time tradeoff and risk posture conditions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47(5), 557–567. CrossRef
- Osterdal, L. P. (2005). Axioms for health care resource allocation. Journal of Health Economics, 24, 679–702. CrossRef
- Attema, A. E., & Brouwer, W. B. F. (2009). The correction of TTO-scores for utility curvature using a risk-free utility elicitation method. Journal of Health Economics, 28(1), 234–243. CrossRef
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061. CrossRef
- Tsuchiya, A., & Dolan, P. (2005). The QALY model and individual preferences for health states and health profiles over time: A systematic review of the literature. Medical Decision Making, 25(4), 460–467. CrossRef
- Miyamoto, J. M., & Eraker, S. A. (1988). A multiplicative model of the utility of survival duration and health quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(1), 3–20. CrossRef
- Hall, J., Gerard, K., Salkeld, G., & Richardson, J. (1992). A cost utility analysis of mammography screening in Australia. Social Science and Medicine, 34(9), 993–1004. CrossRef
- Cook, J., Richardson, J., & Street, A. (1994). A cost utility analysis of treatment options for gallstone disease: methodological issues and results. Health Economics, 3(3), 157–168. CrossRef
- Stalmeier, P. F. M., Wakker, P. P., & Bezembinder, T. G. G. (1997). Preference reversals: Violations of unidimensional procedure invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1196–1205. CrossRef
- Unic, I., Stalmeier, P. F., Verhoef, L. C., & van Daal, W. A. (1998). Assessment of the time-tradeoff values for prophylactic mastectomy of women with a suspected genetic predisposition to breast cancer. Medical Decision Making, 18(3), 268–277. CrossRef
- Kirsch, J., & McGuire, A. (2000). Establishing health state valuations for disease specific states: an example from heart disease. Health Economics, 9(2), 149–158. CrossRef
- Stalmeier, P. F. M., Chapman, G. B., de Boer, A. G. E. M., & van Lanschot, J. J. B. (2001). A fallacy of the multiplicative QALY model for low-quality weights in students and patients judging hypothetical health states. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 17(4), 488–496. CrossRef
- Stalmeier, P. F., Bezembinder, T. G., & Unic, I. J. (1996). Proportional heuristics in time tradeoff and conjoint measurement. Medical Decision Making, 16(1), 36–44. CrossRef
- Martin, A. J., Glasziou, P. P., Simes, R. J., & Lumley, T. (2000). A comparison of standard gamble, time trade-off, and adjusted time trade-off scores. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 16(1), 137–147. CrossRef
- Attema, A. E., & Brouwer, W. B. F. (2008). Can we fix it? Yes we can! But what? A new test of procedural invariance in TTO-measurement. Health Economics, 17(7), 877–885. CrossRef
- van Nooten, F., & Brouwer, W. B. F. (2004). The influence of subjective expectations about length and quality of life on time trade-off answers. Health Economics, 13(8), 819–823. CrossRef
- Arnesen, T., & Trommald, M. (2005). Are QALYs based on time trade-off comparable?—A systematic review of TTO methodologies. Health Economics, 14(1), 39–53. CrossRef
- On the (not so) constant proportional trade-off in TTO
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Quality of Life Research
Volume 19, Issue 4 , pp 489-497
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Constant proportional trade-offs
- QALY model
- TTO method
- Utility of life duration
- Industry Sectors