Skip to main content
Log in

Gordon Tullock’s contributions to bioeconomics

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discuss Gordon Tullock’s contributions to bioeconomics: His contributions to the bioeconomics of non-human societies, his impact on second and third generation bioeconomists, and the founding of the Journal of Bioeconomics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, G. S. (1976). Altruism, egoism, and genetic fitness. Economics and sociobiology. Journal of Economic Literature, 14(3), 817–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, C. T., & Bergstrom, T. C. (1999). Does mother nature punish rotten kids? Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(1), 47–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (2000). Group selection and team sports. Journal of Bioeconomics, 2(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassill, D. (2003). Skew selection: nature favors a trickle-down distribution of resources in ants. Journal of Bioeconomics, 5(2 & 3), 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E. (1976). Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology, 9, 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E. (1990). The economy of nature and the nature of economics. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Cordes, C. (2004). The human adaptation for culture and its behaviorial implications. Journal of Bioeconomics, 6(2), 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corning, P. A. (2000). Biological adaptation in human species: a “basic needs” approach. Journal of Bioeconomics, 2(1), 41–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (2009). Seemingly altruistic behavior: selfish genes or cooperative organisms. Journal of Bioeconomics, 11(3), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J. M. (1966). The role of time and energy in food preference. American Naturalist, 101, 385–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, J. (1958). Predation by tits and squirrels on the eucosmid Ernarmonie conicolana. Journal of Animal Ecology, 27, 375–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T. (1999). Progress and the economy of nature. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T. (2005). Comments on Robert Yarbrough’s ‘teaching bioeconomics’. Journal of Bioeconomics, 7(1), 39–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, A. Jr. (1999). Being and time: on the nature and the evolution of institutions. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(2), 127–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy, J. (2006). Evolutionary theory and economic policy with reference to sustainability. Journal of Bioeconomics, 8(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. (1999). There are many evolutionary pathways to cooperation. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(1), 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. (2007). Taxonomizing the relationship between biology and economics: a very long engagement. Journal of Bioeconomics, 9(2), 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lack, D. (1966). Population studies of birds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa, J. T. (1986). The political economy of swarming in honeybees: voting-with-the wings, decision-making costs, and the unanimity rule. Public Choice, 51, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landa, J. T. (1999). Bioeconomics of some nonhuman and human societies: new institutional economics approach. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(1), 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landa, J. T. (2008). The bioeconomics of homogeneous middleman groups as adaptive units: theory and empirical evidence from a group selection framework. J. T. Landa & D. S. Wilson (Eds.), Special issue: Group selection: theory and evidence. Journal of Bioeconomics, 10(3), 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landa, J. T. (2009). Editor-in-Chief’s farewell: editing the Journal of Bioeconomics, 1999–2009. Journal of Bioeconomics, 11(3), 207–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landa, J. T., & Ghiselin, M. T. (1999). The emerging discipline of bioeconomics: aims and scope of the Journal of Bioeconomics. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(1), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landa, J. T., & Tullock, G. (2003). Why ants do but honeybees do not construct satellite nests. Journal of Bioeconomics, 5(2 & 3), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landa, J. T., & Wallis, A. (1988). Socio-economic organization of honeybee colonies. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 2, 353–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, R. H., & Pianka, E. R. (1966). On optimal use of a patchy environment. American Naturalist, 100, 603–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. S. (2002). On the optimality of the competitive process: Kimura’s theorem and market dynamics. Journal of Bioeconomics, 4(2), 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A. (2006). Behavioural ecology: natural history as science. In J. R. Lucas & L. W. Simmons (Eds.), Essays in animal behaviour. Celebrating 50 years of animal behaviour (pp. 23–56). Burlington: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, F. (2003). What does it mean to be human? A comparison of primate economies. Journal of Bioeconomics, 5(2 & 3), 97–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, P. H. (2000). Group selection and the limits to altruism. Journal of Bioeconomics, 2(1), 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1971). The coal tit as a careful shopper. American Naturalist, 105(941), 77–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1977). Economics and sociobiology: a comment. Journal of Economic Literature, 15(2), 502–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1993). The economics of non-human societies. Tucson: Pallas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1999). Some personal reflections on the history of bioeconomics. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(1), 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeij, G. J. (2009). Comparative economics: evolution and the modern economy. Journal of Bioeconomics, 11(2), 105–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vromen, J. (2010). Allusions to evolution: edifying evolutionary biology rather than economic theory. In R. van Horn, P. Mirowski & T. Stapleford (Eds.), Building Chicago economics: new perspectives on the history of America’s most powerful economics program (pp. 208–236). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: the unity of knowledge. New York: Alfred A. Knoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 82(4), 328–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. (1999). Bioeconomics as economics from a Darwinian perspective. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarbrough, B. V., & Yarbrough, R. M. (1999). Governance structures, insider status, and boundary maintenance. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1(3), 289–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarbrough, R. M., (2005). Teaching bioeconomics. Journal of Bioeconomics, 7(1), 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zak, P. J., & Park, K. W. (2002). Population genetics and economic growth. Journal of Bioeconomics, 4(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet T. Landa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Landa, J.T. Gordon Tullock’s contributions to bioeconomics. Public Choice 152, 203–210 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9855-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9855-2

Keywords

Navigation