Skip to main content
Log in

The politics of digits: evidence of odd taxation

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From the concept of odd pricing, i.e., setting rightmost price digits below a whole number, this paper advances the political counterpart of odd taxation using a panel of Danish municipal taxes. First, the distribution of tax decimals is non-uniform and resembles the distribution of price-endings data. Second, nine-ending and other higher-end decimals are found to be over-represented which echoes odd pricing research. It suggests that incumbents take voters’ biases into account and apply odd taxes to minimize the political costs of taxation while maximizing revenue. Attention should be given to how policy digits are arranged to exploit voters’ cognitive biases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A., Roubini, N., & Cohen, G. D. (1997). Political cycles and the macroeconomy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. T., & Simester, D. I. (2003). Effects of $9 price endings on retail sales: evidence from field experiments. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 1(1), 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, J., Heyndels, B., & Smolders, C. (2003). Psychological taxing in Flemish municipalities. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(6), 741–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benford, F. (1938). The law of anomalous numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78(4), 551–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Incumbent behavior: vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition. The American Economic Review, 85(1), 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizer, G. Y., & Schindler, R. M. (2005). Direct evidence of ending-digit drop-off in price information processing. Psychology and Marketing, 22(10), 771–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blom-Hansen, J. (1999). Avoiding the ‘joint-decision trap’: lesons from intergovernmental relations in Scandinavia. European Journal of Political Research, 35(1), 35–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, G. A., & Brenner, R. (1982). Memory and markets, or why are you paying $2.99 for a widget? The Journal of Business, 55(1), 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunell, T. L., & Glazer, A. (2001). Rational response to irrational attitudes: the level of the gasoline tax in the United States. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 20(4), 761–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carslaw, C. A. P. N. (1988). Anomalies in income numbers: evidence of goal oriented behavior. The Accounting Review, 63(2), 321–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chetty, R., Looney, A., & Kroft, K. (2009). Salience and taxation: theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1145–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J. G. (2000). The dynamics of decentralization and recentralization. Public Administration, 78(2), 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, K. S. (2001). Odd-ending price underestimation: an experimental examination of left-to-right processing effects. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 10(5), 276–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmark, K., & Agren, H. (2008). Identifying strategic interactions in Swedish local income tax policies. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(3), 849–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, A. (2009). E-ZTAX: tax salience and tax rates. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 969–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiva, J., & Rattsø, J. (2007). Local choice of property taxation: evidence from Norway. Public Choice, 132(3), 457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Eichenberger, R. (1991). Anomalies in political economy. Public Choice, 68(1), 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedenk, K., & Sattler, H. (1999). The impact of price thresholds on profit contribution—should retailers set 9-ending prices? Journal of Retailing, 75(1), 33–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hales, D. N., Chakravorty, S. S., & Sridharan, V. (2009). Testing Benford’s Law for improving supply chain decision-making: a field experiment. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(2), 606–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. (1991). Stock price clustering and discreteness. The Review of Financial Studies, 4(3), 399–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, T. P. (1995). A statistical derivation of the significant-digit law. Statistical Science, 10(4), 354–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knauth, O. (1949). Considerations in the setting of retail prices. The Journal of Marketing, 14(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A., & Slemrod, J. (2003). Behavioral public finance: tax design as price presentation. International Tax and Public Finance, 10(2), 189–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaffery, E. J. (1994). The UCLA tax policy conference: cognitive theory and tax. UCLA Law Review, 41, 1861–1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaffery, E. J., & Baron, J. (2006). Thinking about tax. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12(1), 106–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1848). Principles of political economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Interior (1984). The municipal tax law [Bekendtgørelse af lov om kommunal indkomstskat]. Copenhagen: Indenrigsministeriet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, B. (1990). An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(2), 334–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, S. (1881). Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. American Journal of Mathematics, 4(1), 38–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niederhoffer, V. (1965). Clustering of stock prices. Operations Research, 13(2), 258–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigrini, M. (1996). A taxpayer compliance application of Benford’s Law. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 18, 72–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. The Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rattsø, J. (2004). Local tax financing in the Nordic countries. Working paper, ‘Economic General Report’ for the 2004 Nordic Tax Research Council meeting in Oslo.

  • Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 532–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, P. (1987). Decentralisation as an incentive scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3(2), 24–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sausgruber, R., & Tyran, J. R. (2005). Testing the Mill Hypothesis of fiscal illusion. Public Choice, 122(1/2), 39–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, R. (1996). Increased consumer sales response though use of 99-ending prices. Journal of Retailing, 72(2), 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, R., & Wiman, A. R. (1989). Effects of odd pricing on price recall. Journal of Business Research, 19(3), 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, R. M., & Chandrashekaran, R. (2004). Influence of price endings on price recall: a by-digit analysis. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13(7), 514–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, R. M., & Kirby, P. N. (1997). Patterns of rightmost digits used in advertised prices: implications for nine-ending effects. The Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 192–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiving, M., & Winer, R. S. (1997). An empirical analysis of price endings with scanner data. The Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suri, R., Anderson, R., & Kotlov, V. (2004). The use of 9-ending prices: contrasting the USA with Poland. European Journal of Marketing, 38(1/2), 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepe, M., & Vanhuysse, P. (2009). Educational business cycles. Public Choice, 139(1), 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. (2005). Penny Wise and pound foolish: the left-digit effect in price cognition. Journal of Consumer Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 32(1), 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twedt, D. W. (1965). Does the “9 Fixation” in retail pricing really promote sales? The Journal of Marketing, 29(4), 54–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veiga, L., & Veiga, F. (2007). Political business cycles at the municipal level. Public Choice, 131(1), 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yule, G. U. (1927). On reading a scale. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 90(3), 570–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asmus Leth Olsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olsen, A.L. The politics of digits: evidence of odd taxation. Public Choice 154, 59–73 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9807-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9807-x

Keywords

Navigation