Abstract
From the concept of odd pricing, i.e., setting rightmost price digits below a whole number, this paper advances the political counterpart of odd taxation using a panel of Danish municipal taxes. First, the distribution of tax decimals is non-uniform and resembles the distribution of price-endings data. Second, nine-ending and other higher-end decimals are found to be over-represented which echoes odd pricing research. It suggests that incumbents take voters’ biases into account and apply odd taxes to minimize the political costs of taxation while maximizing revenue. Attention should be given to how policy digits are arranged to exploit voters’ cognitive biases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alesina, A., Roubini, N., & Cohen, G. D. (1997). Political cycles and the macroeconomy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Anderson, E. T., & Simester, D. I. (2003). Effects of $9 price endings on retail sales: evidence from field experiments. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 1(1), 93–110.
Ashworth, J., Heyndels, B., & Smolders, C. (2003). Psychological taxing in Flemish municipalities. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(6), 741–762.
Benford, F. (1938). The law of anomalous numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78(4), 551–572.
Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Incumbent behavior: vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition. The American Economic Review, 85(1), 25–45.
Bizer, G. Y., & Schindler, R. M. (2005). Direct evidence of ending-digit drop-off in price information processing. Psychology and Marketing, 22(10), 771–783.
Blom-Hansen, J. (1999). Avoiding the ‘joint-decision trap’: lesons from intergovernmental relations in Scandinavia. European Journal of Political Research, 35(1), 35–67.
Brenner, G. A., & Brenner, R. (1982). Memory and markets, or why are you paying $2.99 for a widget? The Journal of Business, 55(1), 147–158.
Brunell, T. L., & Glazer, A. (2001). Rational response to irrational attitudes: the level of the gasoline tax in the United States. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 20(4), 761–764.
Carslaw, C. A. P. N. (1988). Anomalies in income numbers: evidence of goal oriented behavior. The Accounting Review, 63(2), 321–327.
Chetty, R., Looney, A., & Kroft, K. (2009). Salience and taxation: theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1145–77.
Christensen, J. G. (2000). The dynamics of decentralization and recentralization. Public Administration, 78(2), 389–408.
Coulter, K. S. (2001). Odd-ending price underestimation: an experimental examination of left-to-right processing effects. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 10(5), 276–292.
Edmark, K., & Agren, H. (2008). Identifying strategic interactions in Swedish local income tax policies. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(3), 849–857.
Finkelstein, A. (2009). E-ZTAX: tax salience and tax rates. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 969–1010.
Fiva, J., & Rattsø, J. (2007). Local choice of property taxation: evidence from Norway. Public Choice, 132(3), 457–470.
Frey, B. S., & Eichenberger, R. (1991). Anomalies in political economy. Public Choice, 68(1), 71–89.
Gedenk, K., & Sattler, H. (1999). The impact of price thresholds on profit contribution—should retailers set 9-ending prices? Journal of Retailing, 75(1), 33–57.
Hales, D. N., Chakravorty, S. S., & Sridharan, V. (2009). Testing Benford’s Law for improving supply chain decision-making: a field experiment. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(2), 606–618.
Harris, L. (1991). Stock price clustering and discreteness. The Review of Financial Studies, 4(3), 399–415.
Hill, T. P. (1995). A statistical derivation of the significant-digit law. Statistical Science, 10(4), 354–363.
Knauth, O. (1949). Considerations in the setting of retail prices. The Journal of Marketing, 14(1), 1–12.
Krishna, A., & Slemrod, J. (2003). Behavioral public finance: tax design as price presentation. International Tax and Public Finance, 10(2), 189–203.
McCaffery, E. J. (1994). The UCLA tax policy conference: cognitive theory and tax. UCLA Law Review, 41, 1861–1947.
McCaffery, E. J., & Baron, J. (2006). Thinking about tax. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12(1), 106–135.
Mill, J. S. (1848). Principles of political economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Ministry of Interior (1984). The municipal tax law [Bekendtgørelse af lov om kommunal indkomstskat]. Copenhagen: Indenrigsministeriet.
Moulton, B. (1990). An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(2), 334–338.
Newcomb, S. (1881). Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. American Journal of Mathematics, 4(1), 38–39.
Niederhoffer, V. (1965). Clustering of stock prices. Operations Research, 13(2), 258–265.
Nigrini, M. (1996). A taxpayer compliance application of Benford’s Law. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 18, 72–91.
Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. The Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169–190.
Rattsø, J. (2004). Local tax financing in the Nordic countries. Working paper, ‘Economic General Report’ for the 2004 Nordic Tax Research Council meeting in Oslo.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 532–547.
Salmon, P. (1987). Decentralisation as an incentive scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3(2), 24–42.
Sausgruber, R., & Tyran, J. R. (2005). Testing the Mill Hypothesis of fiscal illusion. Public Choice, 122(1/2), 39–68.
Schindler, R. (1996). Increased consumer sales response though use of 99-ending prices. Journal of Retailing, 72(2), 187–199.
Schindler, R., & Wiman, A. R. (1989). Effects of odd pricing on price recall. Journal of Business Research, 19(3), 165–177.
Schindler, R. M., & Chandrashekaran, R. (2004). Influence of price endings on price recall: a by-digit analysis. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13(7), 514–524.
Schindler, R. M., & Kirby, P. N. (1997). Patterns of rightmost digits used in advertised prices: implications for nine-ending effects. The Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 192–201.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.
Stiving, M., & Winer, R. S. (1997). An empirical analysis of price endings with scanner data. The Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 57–67.
Suri, R., Anderson, R., & Kotlov, V. (2004). The use of 9-ending prices: contrasting the USA with Poland. European Journal of Marketing, 38(1/2), 56–72.
Tepe, M., & Vanhuysse, P. (2009). Educational business cycles. Public Choice, 139(1), 61–82.
Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. (2005). Penny Wise and pound foolish: the left-digit effect in price cognition. Journal of Consumer Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 32(1), 54–64.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
Twedt, D. W. (1965). Does the “9 Fixation” in retail pricing really promote sales? The Journal of Marketing, 29(4), 54–55.
Veiga, L., & Veiga, F. (2007). Political business cycles at the municipal level. Public Choice, 131(1), 45–64.
Yule, G. U. (1927). On reading a scale. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 90(3), 570–587.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olsen, A.L. The politics of digits: evidence of odd taxation. Public Choice 154, 59–73 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9807-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9807-x