Skip to main content
Log in

The political economy of smoking regulation and taxation

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although anti-smoking policies are on the political agenda in almost all developed countries, a general understanding of these policies is still lacking. Applying the majority voting model of Buchanan and Vanberg (Public Choice 57(2):101–113, 1988) to tobacco taxation and smoking regulation shows that different smoking policies are feasible, depending on the composition of the majority of voters with smokers and non-smokers: (1) internalization of spill-over costs with a mixed majority of smokers and non-smokers as well as (2) a combination of regulation and taxation with a non-smoker majority. Moreover, the influence of the tobacco industry is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashley, M. J., Bull, S. B., & Pederson, L. L. (1995). Support among smokers and nonsmokers for restrictions on smoking. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 11(5), 283–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, M. J., Cohen, J., Bull, S., Ferrence, R., Poland, B., Pederson, L., & Gao, J. (2000). Knowledge about tobacco and attitudes toward tobacco control: how different are smokers and nonsmokers? Canadian Journal of Public Health, 91(5), 376–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnoya, J., & Glantz, S. A. (2006). The tobacco industry’s worldwide ETS consultants project: European and Asian components. European Journal of Public Health, 16(1), 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D., Peleg, B., & Whinston, M. D. (1987). Coalition-proof Nash equilibria I. Concepts. Journal of Economic Theory, 42(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, H. G., & Lomasky, L. E. (1993). Democracy and decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornhauser, A., McCarthy, J., & Glantz, S. A. (2006). German tobacco industry’s successful efforts to maintain scientific and political respectability to prevent regulation of secondhand smoke. Tobacco Control, 15(2), e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1954). Individual choice in voting and the market. Journal of Political Economy, 62, 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1998). Majoritarian logic. Public Choice, 97(1–2), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., & Vanberg, V. J. (1988). The politicization of market failure. Public Choice, 57(2), 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, S. (2002). The economics of sin. Rational choice or no choice at all? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaloupka, F. J., & Warner, K. E. (2000). The economics of smoking. In A. J. Culyer & J. P. Newhouse (Eds.), Handbook of health economics (vol. 1B, pp. 1539–1627). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, K. M., Hyland, A., Giovino, G. A., Hastrup, J. L., Bauer, J. E., & Bansal, M. A. (2004). Are smokers adequately informed about the health risks of smoking and medicinal nicotine? Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 6(3), S333–S340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist (2006). The avuncular state. The Economist, 378(8472), 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, K. M., Kawachi, I., & Barclay, G. (1997). Tobacco control: a brief review of its history and prospects for the future. Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America, 11(2), 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, G. T., Hammond, D., Laux, F. L., Zanna, M. P., Cummings, K. M., Borland, R., & Ross, H. (2004). The near-universal experience of regret among smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 6(3), S341–S351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J., & Koszegi, B. (2004). Tax incidence when individuals are time-inconsistent: the case of cigarette excise taxes. Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 1959–1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. H., & Mullainathan, S. (2005). Do cigarette taxes make smokers happier? Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 5(1), Article 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruning, T., Gilmore, A. B., & McKee, M. (2006). Tobacco industry influence on science and scientists in Germany. American Journal of Public Health, 96(1), 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, D. (2000). Smoke gets in your eyes: the economic welfare of the World Bank–WHO global crusade against tobacco (UCLA Dept. of Economics Working Paper No. 794).

  • Lee, D. R. (1991). Government v. Coase: the case of smoking. Cato Journal, 11(1), 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemieux, P. (2000). The economics of smoking. In The library of economics and liberty, Contributors’ Forum, Feature Essay June 28, 2000. http://www.econlib.org/library/Features/feature5.html. Accessed 4 September 2006.

  • Levy, R. (2003). Taxation through litigation. In D. Racheter & R. E. Wagner (Eds.), Politics, taxation, and the rule of law (pp. 145–166). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, R. A., & Marimont, R. B. (1998). Lies, damned lies, & 400,000 smoking-related deaths. Regulation, 21(4), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R. E., Tollison, R., & Wagner, R. E. (1997). Smoking, insurance, and social cos st. Regulation, 20(3), 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse (no year). History of tobacco regulation. http://druglibrary.org/schaffer/LIBRARY/studies/nc/nc2b.htm. Accessed 9 April 2006.

  • N.N. (2006). History of smoking. http://www.forestonline.org/output/page34.asp. Accessed 4 September 2006.

  • O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2005). Optimal taxes for sin goods. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 12(2), 7–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poland, B. D., Stockton, L., Ashley, M. J., Pederson, L., Cohen, J., Ferrence, R., & Bull, S. (1999). Interactions between smokers and non-smokers in public places: a qualitative study. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 90(5), 330–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poland, B. D., Cohen, J. E., Ashley, M. J., Adlaf, E., Ferrence, R., Pederson, L. L., Bull, S. B., & Raphael, D. (2000). Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions. Tobacco Control, 9(4), 364–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, H. A., & Jacobson, P. D. (2003). Political economy of youth smoking regulation. Addiction, 98(1), 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simms, J. (no year). The political economy of the tobacco industry. Mimeo, Appalachian State University. http://org.elon.edu/ipe/simms.pdf. Accessed 9 April 2006.

  • Vatican (1997). Catechism of the Catholic Church. http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM. Accessed 15 April 2009.

  • Viscusi, W. K. (1995). Cigarette taxation and the social consequences of smoking. Tax Policy and the Economy, 9, 51–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. (1997). From cash crop to cash cow. How tobacco profits state governments. Regulation, 20(3), 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. (2002). The new cigarette paternalism. Regulation, 25(4), 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (1999). Understanding the tobacco settlement: the state as a partisan plaintiff. Regulation, 22(4), 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (2004). Meddlesome preferences and rent extraction: the tobacco shakedown. In C. K. Rowley & F. Schneider (Eds.), The encyclopedia of public choice (Vol. II, pp. 378–380). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Z. (2004). Why take on the tobacco industry: the political economy of government anti-smoking campaign (Carleton Economic Paper CEP 03-04, Carleton University).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aloys L. Prinz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prinz, A.L. The political economy of smoking regulation and taxation. Public Choice 141, 291–303 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9452-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9452-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation