Skip to main content
Log in

Political fragmentation, fiscal deficits and political institutionalisation

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One line of research finds the size of the deficit to be positively correlated with the number of political actors. This ‘political fragmentation’ hypothesis has been tested on OECD countries. We successfully replicate Volkerink and de Haan’s (Public Choice 109:221–242, 2001) model on an OECD sample. However, when we add ten non-OECD countries, the effect of political fragmentation disappears. We argue that the importance of political fragmentation varies according to the institutionalization of political systems. When we interact the age of a democracy with political fragmentation, we find that legislative fractionalisation increases the budget deficit as a democracy becomes more institutionalised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1999). Budget deficits and budget institutions. In J. Poterba & J. Von Hagen (Eds.), Fiscal institutions and fiscal performance (pp. 13–36). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt, J. (2002). Comparative political economy: credibility, accountability, and institutions. In I. Katznelson & H. Milner (Eds.), Political science: the state of the discipline (pp. 147–171). New York: WW Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some test of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P., & Walsh, P. (2001). New tools in comparative political economy: The Database of Political Institutions. World Bank Economic Review, 15, 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1979). On the determination of public debt. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 940–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (1978). The expansion of the public economy: a comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 72, 1203–1261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clague, C., Keefer, P., Knack, S., & Olson, M. (1996). Property and contract rights in autocracies and democracies. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 243–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crain, W. M., & Muris, T. E. (1995). Legislative organization of fiscal policy. Journal of Law and Economics, 38, 311–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, J., & Sturm, J.-E. (1997). Political and economic determinants of OECD budget deficits and government expenditures: a reinvestigation. European Journal of Political Economy, 13, 739–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, J., Sturm, J.-E., & Beekhuis, G. (1999). The weak government thesis: Some new evidence. Public Choice, 101, 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House (2005). Freedom in the world 2005: the annual survey of political rights and civil liberties. Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, R. (1984). Government finance in developing countries. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerburg, M., & Von Hagen, J. (1999). Electoral institutions, cabinet negotiations, and budget deficits in the European Union. In J. M. Poterba & J. Von Hagen (Eds.), Fiscal institutions and fiscal performance (pp. 209–232). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 725–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M., Sanguinetti, P., & Tommasi, M. (2000). Politics, institutions and fiscal performance in a federal system: an analysis of Argentine provinces. Journal of Development Economics, 61, 305–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, P. (2005). Democratization and clientelism: why are young democracies so badly governed? Policy Research Paper 3594. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Kontopolous, Y., & Perotti, R. (1999). Government fragmentation and fiscal policy outcomes: evidence from OECD countries. In J. M. Poterba & J. Von Hagen (Eds.), Fiscal institutions and fiscal performance (pp. 81–102). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perotti, R., & Kontopolous, Y. (2002). Fragmented fiscal policy. Journal of Public Economics, 82, 191–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2003). The economic effects of constitutions. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. E., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development. Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D. (1971). The political consequences of electoral laws. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106, 997–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roubini, N., & Sachs, J. (1989). Government spending and budget deficits in the industrial countries. Economic Policy, 8, 99–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E., Talvi, E., & Grisanti, A. (1999). Institutional arrangements and fiscal performance: The Latin American experience. In J. M. Poterba & J. Von Hagen (Eds.), Fiscal institutions and fiscal performance (pp. 103–133). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasco, A. (2000). Debts and deficits with fragmented fiscal policy making. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkerink, B., & de Haan, J. (2001). Fragmented government effects on fiscal policy: new evidence. Public Choice, 109, 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woldendorp, J., Keman, H., & Budge, I. (1993). Special issue: political data 1945–1990: party government in twenty democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 24.

  • Woldendorp, J., Keman, H., & Budge, I. (1998). Party government in twenty democracies: an update (1990–1995). European Journal of Political Research, 33, 125–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, J. (2003). Economic, political and institutional determinants of public deficits. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 387–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Elgie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elgie, R., McMenamin, I. Political fragmentation, fiscal deficits and political institutionalisation. Public Choice 136, 255–267 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9294-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9294-x

Keywords

Navigation