Skip to main content
Log in

Harassment at the Workplace: A Practical Review of the Laws in the United Kingdom and the United States of America

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Harassment is a major deterrent for productivity, loyalty, and commitment to one’s job and organization. Unfortunately, many employees tend to experience various forms of harassment in the workplace. The focus in this article is to understand the extent to which the law protects a person from harassment, first based on the explication and application laws in the United Kingdom. The article then provides comparative discussion of laws and practices against workplace harassment in the United States. A major objective of this article is to help employers and managers become more expert in preventing and correcting harassment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bibby v. Phila. Coco Cola Bottling Co., 260 F. 3d 257 (3rd Cir. 2001).

  • Burris v Azadani (1995) 4 All ER 802, The Times, 9 August, 1995, Court of Appeal.

  • Cavico, F. C., Muffler, S. C., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2012). Sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in the American workplace: legal and ethical considerations. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavico, F. C., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2009). Business ethics: The moral foundation of effective leadership, management, and entrepreneurship. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavico, F. C., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2008). Legal challenges for the global manager and entrepreneur. Dubuque: Kendall-Hunt Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, S. (2011). The queer truth: the need to update title VII to include sexual orientation. University of Notre Dame Journal of Legislation, 37, 119–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, P. E. (2010). Cyberharassment, sexting and other high-tech offenses involving Michigan residents—are we victims or criminals? University of Detroit Mercy Law Review, 88, 237–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson v. Entek International, 630 F.3d 928 (9th Cir. 2011).

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Age Discrimination. Retrieved January 24, 2012 from: http://www1.eeoc.gov//laws/types/age.cfm.

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Disability Discrimination. Retrieved January 24, 2012 from: http://www1.eeoc.gov//laws/types/disability.cfm.

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. National Origin Discrimination. Retrieved January 24, 2012 from: http://www.1.eeoc.gov//laws/types/nationalorigin.cfm.

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Prohibited Employment Policies/Practices. Retrieved January 24, 2012 from: http://www1.eeoc.gov//laws/practices/index.cfm.

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Prohibited Employment Policies/Practices, Harassment. Retrieved January 24, 2012 from: http://www1.eeoc.gov//laws/practices/harassment.cfm.

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Race/Color Discrimination & Harassment. Retrieved January 24, 2012 from: http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/race_color.cfm.

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Religious Discrimination. Retrieved January 24, 2012 from: http://www1.eeoc.gov//laws/types/religion.cfm.

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Sexual Harassment. Retrieved January 24, 2012 from: http://www1.eeoc.gov//laws/types/sexaul_harassment.cfm.

  • Fredette v. BVP Management Associates,112 F.3d 1503 (11th Cir. 1997).

  • Hansard (1996). Protection from Harassment Bill. Retrieved October 15, 2012 from: http://hansard.milbanksystems.com/lords/1997/jan/24/protection-from-harassment-bill.

  • Henderson, A. M. (2009). High-tech words do hurt: a modern makeover expands Missouri’s harassment law to include electronic communications. Missouri Law Review, 74, 379–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1996). Protection from Harassment Act 1997. Retrieved October 15, 2012 from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contents.

  • Humphrey, R. H. (2011). Cyber crimes: bullying, stalking, sexting & texting. Rhode Island Bar Journal, 59, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeton, W. P., Dobbs, D. B., Keeton, R. E., & Owen, D. G. (1984). Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts (5th edition). West Publishing Company Hornbook Series.

  • Khorasandjian v Bush (1993) 3 All ER 669, The Times 18 February, 1993, Court of Appeal.

  • Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust Case.

  • Mujtaba, B. G. (2010). Workforce diversity management: Challenges, competencies and strategies (2nd ed.). Davie: ILEAD Academy Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, K. T. (2005). The threshold for hostile work environment. Orange County Bar Association. Orange County Lawyer, 47, 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 U.S. 75, 118 S.Ct 998 (1998).

  • Rene v. MGM Grand Hotel, Inc., 305 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2002), certiorari denied, 538 U.S. 922 (2003).

  • R v Burstow (1997) 4 All ER 225, The Times, 25 July, 1997, House of Lords.

  • R v. Ireland (1996). The Times, 22 May, 1996.

  • R v. Johnston (1996). The Times, 22 May, 1996.

  • Who Can be Harassed. (1997). Who Can Be Harassed? Claims against Animal Rights Protestors Under Section 3 of the Protection From Harassment Act of 1997. The Cambridge Law Journal, 64(1), 1f.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (2008). Misperceptions matter: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from discrimination based on misperceived religious status. Utah Law Review, 2008, 357–379.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahaudin G. Mujtaba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilani, S.R.S., Cavico, F.J. & Mujtaba, B.G. Harassment at the Workplace: A Practical Review of the Laws in the United Kingdom and the United States of America. Public Organiz Rev 14, 1–18 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-012-0202-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-012-0202-y

Keywords

Navigation