Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environment, transnational labor migration, and gender: case studies from southern Yucatán, Mexico and Vermont, USA

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gender shapes the migration–environment association in both origin and destination communities. Using quantitative and qualitative data, we juxtapose these gender dimensions for a labor migrant-sending location of Mexico’s southern Yucatán with those for a labor migrant-receiving location in Vermont (USA). We illustrate how in the southern Yucatán, circular transnational migration alters pasture, maize and chili production in a peasant field–forest system. Gender norms condition the land-use decisions of migratory households to keep women out of agricultural fields, but in turn may be modified in unexpected ways. With men’s migration, more women assume aspects of land management, including in decision-making and supervision of hired farm labor. In comparison, in Vermont a largely male migrant labor force helps maintain an idealized, pastoral landscape with gender deeply embedded in how that labor is constructed and managed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Though see Mitchell (1996) for California and Duncan and Duncan (2003) on suburban spaces.

  2. Much of the research was carried out as part of the Southern Yucatán Peninsular Region Land Use/Cover Change project (see Turner et al 2004). See Schmook and Radel (2008) for full details on the 2003 survey and methods.

  3. The ethnic composition of these communities was largely mestizo (mixed European and indigenous ancestry).

  4. For migrant households, we distinguished between households in which the male head of household was the international migrant and those in which another household member (such as an adult son) was the international migrant. For analyses comparing households with male migrant heads to those without, we excluded six households with no male head (due to death or partnership dissolution).

  5. Comparisons between households with and without male migrant heads were made, as well as comparisons between households with and without any migrant member.

  6. Only a minute proportion (about 5%; E. Shea, pers comm. 7/14/09) of migrant farm workers from Latin America, working in the Vermont dairy industry, originate from countries other than Mexico.

  7. See McCandless (2010) for full details on interview methods.

  8. We allowed for this lag time from 2005 to 2007, as it often takes migrants more than a year to make and realize the decision to travel north.

  9. We discuss some of the early gendered impacts of male out-migration in Radel and Schmook (2009), particularly with respect to women’s agricultural labor and decision-making.

  10. Many households borrow the money needed, which, if the migrant is undocumented, can be around $2000 US.

  11. Based on the field research, McCandless estimates that hired farm hands are required for the operation of farms with more than 70 cattle, with one additional worker per 100 milking cattle.

  12. The year-round nature of the work makes dairy labor ineligible for H2A visas available to seasonal agricultural workers.

  13. The Vermont Migrant Education Program reports an average wage of $6.00 to $7.50 an hour.

  14. Vermont Migrant Education Program staff member.

References

  • Agarwal, B. (2003). Gender and land rights revisited: Exploring new prospects via the state, family and market. Journal of Agrarian Change, 3(1, 2), 184–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aide, T., & Grau, H. (2004). Globalization, migration, and Latin American ecosystems. Science, 305(5692), 1915–1916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albers, J. (2000). Hands on the land: A history of the Vermont landscape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alscher, S. (2009). Mexico: Case study report. Environmental Change and Forced Migration Scenarios (EACH-FOR) Project. Available via http://www.each-for.eu/documents/CSR_Mexico_090126.pdf. Cited 18 May 2010.

  • Appendini, K. (2003). The challenges to rural Mexico in an open economy. In J. Tulchin & A. Selee (Eds.), Mexico’s politics and society in transition (pp. 255–275). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, A., & Carr, D. (2005). Gender-specific out-migration, deforestation and urbanization in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Global and Planetary Change, 47(2–4), 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batalova, J. (2008). Mexican immigrants in the United States. Migration Policy Institute. Available via Migration Information Source, US in Focus. http://www.migrationinformation.org/USFocus/display.cfm?ID=679. Cited 13 May 2010.

  • Bates, D. (2002). Environmental refugees? Classifying human migrations caused by environmental change. Population and Environment, 23(5), 465–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bever, S. W. (2002). Migration and the transformation of gender roles and hierarchies in Yucatan. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development, 31(2), 199–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, D. (2008). “Now I am a man and a woman!” Gendered moves and migrations in a transnational Mexican community. Latin American Perspectives, 35(1), 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1970). Women’s role in economic development. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (2004). Proximate population factors and deforestation in tropical agricultural frontiers. Population and Environment, 25(6), 585–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (2005). Forest clearing among farm households in the Maya Biosphere Reserve. The Professional Geographer, 57(2), 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (2008a). Migration to the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala: Why place matters. Human Organization, 67(1), 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (2008b). Farm households and land use in a core conservation zone of the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Human Ecology, 36(2), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (2009). Population and deforestation: Why rural migration matters. Progress in Human Geography, 33(3), 355–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chant, S. (1991). Gender, migration and urban development in Costa Rica: The case of Guanacaste. Geoforum, 22(3), 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chant, S. (Ed.). (1992). Gender and migration in developing countries. New York: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chant, S. (1997). Women-headed households: Diversity and dynamics in the developing world. London: MacMillan Press, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, D., & Cohen, J. (1998). Consequences of migration and remittances for Mexican transnational communities. Economic Geography, 74(1), 26–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, J. (Ed.). (1988). Agriculture, women, and land: The African experience. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, A. (2006). Migration in the development studies literature: Has it come out of marginality? Research Paper No. 2006/19, World Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations University. Available at http://www.wider.unu.edu/publications/working-papers/research-papers/2006/en_GB/rp2006-19/. Cited 18 May 2010.

  • de Sherbinin, A., VanWey, L., McSweeney, K., Aggarwal, R., Barbieri, A., Henry, S., et al. (2008). Rural household demographics, livelihoods and the environment. Global Environmental Change, 18, 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deere, C. D. (2005). The feminization of agriculture? Economic restructuring in rural Latin America. Geneva: Occasional Paper 1, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deere, C. D., & León, M. (2003). The gender asset gap: Land in Latin America. World Development, 31(6), 925–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreby, J. (2009). Gender and transnational gossip. Qualitative Sociology, 32, 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J., & Duncan, N. (2003). Can’t live with them; can’t landscape without them: Racism and the pastoral aesthetic in suburban New York. Landscape Journal, 22(2), 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, J., Kandel, W., Parrado, E., & Massey, D. (1996). International migration and development in Mexican communities. Demography, 33(2), 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J. M., & Lawrence, D. (2009). Loss of carbon sequestration potential after several decades of shifting cultivation in the southern Yucatán. Forest Ecology and Management, 258(6), 949–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echánove, F., & Steffen, C. (2004). Coping with trade liberalization: The case of Mexican grain producers. Culture and Agriculture, 25(2), 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findley, S. (1997). Migration and family interactions in Africa. In A. Adepoju (Ed.), Family, population and development in Africa (pp. 109–138). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1963). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau, H., Aide, T., Zimmerman, J., Thomlinson, J., Helmer, E., & Zou, X. (2003). The ecological consequences of socioeconomic and land-use changes in postagriculture Puerto Rico. BioScience, 53(12), 1159–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravel, N. (2007). Mexican smallholders adrift: The urgent needs for a new social contract in rural Mexico. Journal of Latin American Geography, 6(2), 77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. (2008). Environment, land, and rural out-migration in the southern Ecuadorian Andes. World Development, 37(2), 457–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. (2009). Rural out-migration and smallholder agriculture in the southern Ecuadorian Andes. Population and Environment, 30(4, 5), 193–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B. A. (2006). The view from Vermont: Tourism and the making of an American rural landscape. Hanover: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, S. B., Kandel, S., Gomes, I., Cuellar, N., & Rosa, H. (2006). Globalization, forest resurgence, and environmental politics in El Salvador. World Development, 34(2), 308–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (1994). Gendered transitions: Mexican experiences of immigration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostettler, S. (2007). Land use changes and transnational migration: The impact of remittances in western Mexico. Ph.D. thesis, École Polytechnique Fédéral de Lausanne.

  • Hugo, G. (2008). Migration, development and environment. SSRC Migration and Development Conference Paper No. 9. Brooklyn, NY: Social Science Research Council.

  • International, Q. S. R. (2007). NVivo 16: QData. Chicago: QSR International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokisch, B. (2002). Migration and agricultural change: The case of smallholder agriculture in highland Ecuador. Human Ecology, 30(4), 523–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokisch, B., & Lair, B. (2002). One last stand? Forests and change on Ecuador’s eastern Cordillera. The Geographical Review, 92(2), 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E. (2003). The changing role of women in the rural economies of Latin America. In B. Davis (Ed.), Food, agriculture, and rural development. Volume I: Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 31–65). Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessel, H., & Bolduc, V. L. (2008). Vermont in transition: A summary of social, economic, and environmental trends. Paper prepared for the Council on the Future of Vermont. http://futureofvermont.org/files/u1/VTTransitions_Full_noAppen.pdf (Last accessed Feb 19, 2008).

  • Klooster, D. (2003). Forest transitions in Mexico: Institutions and forests in a globalized countryside. The Professional Geographer, 55(2), 227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klyza, C. M., & Trombulak, S. C. (Eds.). (1999). The story of Vermont: A natural and cultural history. Hanover: University Press of New England and Middlebury College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lastarria-Cornhiel, S. (2006). Feminization of agriculture: Trends and driving forces. Background Paper for the World Development Report 2008. Available from http://www.rimisp.org/getdoc.php?docid=6489. Cited 18 May 2010.

  • Maloney, T. R., & Grusenmeyer, D. C. (2005). Survey of Hispanic dairy workers in New York State. Research Bulletin 05-02. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., Capoferro, C., & Fischer, M. (2006). International migration and gender in Latin America: A comparative analysis. International Migration, 44(5), 63–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, A. (1992). The forest transition. Area, 24(4), 367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCandless, S. (2010). Conserving the landscapes of Vermont: Shifting terms of access and visibility. Ph.D. thesis, Clark University.

  • McEvoy, J. (2008). Male out-migration and the women left behind: A case study of a small farming community in southeastern Mexico. M.S. thesis, Utah State University.

  • McKay, D. (2005). Reading remittance landscapes: Female migration and agricultural transition in the Philippines. Geografisk Tidsskrift, Danish Journal of Geography, 105(1), 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menjívar, C., & Agadjanian, V. (2007). Men’s migration and women’s lives: Views from rural Armenia and Guatemala. Social Science Quarterly, 88(5), 1243–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (1996). The lie of the land: Migrant workers and the California landscape. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (2002). Environmental refugees: A growing phenomenon of the 21st century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 357(1420), 609–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberhauser, A., Mandel, J., & Hapke, H. (2004). Gendered livelihoods in diverse global contexts: An introduction. Gender, Place and Culture, 11(2), 205–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W., Carr, D., Barbieri, A., Bilsborrow, R., & Suchindran, C. (2007). Forest clearing in the Ecuadorean Amazon: A study of patterns over space and time. Population Research and Policy Review, 26, 635–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrado, E., & Flippen, C. (2005). Migration and gender among Mexican women. American Sociological Review, 70(4), 606–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passel, J., & Cohn, D. (2008). Trends in unauthorized immigration: Undocumented inflow now trails legal inflow. Pew Hispanic Center. Available from http://www.ime.gob.mx/investigaciones/2008/phc_trends_unauthorized_immigration_undocumented_inflow_now_trails_legal_inflow.pdf. Cited 18 May 2010.

  • Perz, S., & Skole, D. (2003). Secondary forest expansion in the Brazilian Amazon and the refinement of forest transition theory. Society & Natural Resources, 16(4), 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessar, P., & Mahler, S. (2003). Transnational migration: Bringing gender in. International Migration Review, 37, 812–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radel, C., & Schmook, B. (2008). Male transnational migration and its linkages to land use change in a southern Campeche ejido. Journal of Latin American Geography, 7(2), 59–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radel, C., & Schmook, B. (2009). Migration and gender: The case of a farming ejido in Calakmul, Mexico. The Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers, 71, 144–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radel, C., Schmook, B., & Roy Chowdhury, R. (2010). Agricultural livelihood transition in the southern Yucatán region: Diverging paths and their accompanying land changes. Regional Environmental Change, 10(3), 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratha, D., & Xu, Z. (2008). Migration and remittances factbook. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Razavi, S. (Ed.). (2003). Journal of Agrarian Change, Special Issue on Agrarian Change, Gender and Land Rights 3(1, 2).

  • Rocheleau, D., Thomas-Slayter, B., & Wangari, E. (Eds.). (1996). Feminist political ecology: Global issues and local experiences. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozelle, S., Taylor, J., & DeBrauw, A. (1999). Migration, remittances, and agricultural productivity in China. American Economic Review, 89(2), 287–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudel, T. (2005). Tropical forests: Regional paths of destruction and regeneration in the late twentieth century. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudel, T., Bates, D., & Machinguiashi, R. (2002). A tropical forest transition? Agricultural change, out-migration, secondary forests in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(1), 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, C. (1996). Gendered fields: Rural women, agriculture and environment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  • Schmook, B., & Radel, C. (2008). International labor migration from a tropical development frontier: Globalizing households and an incipient forest transition—the southern Yucatán case. Human Ecology, 36(6), 891–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sierra, R. (2000). Dynamics and patterns of deforestation in the western Amazon: The Napo deforestation front, 1986–1996. Applied Geography, 20, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvey, R. (2004). Power, difference, and mobility: Feminist advances in migration studies. Progress in Human Geography, 28(4), 490–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, S. (2007). Fewer people may not mean more forest for Latin American forest frontiers. Biotropica, 39(4), 443–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, M. (2007). A northeast dairy benchmark. Cornell Program on Dairy and Markets Policy. Available from http://www.centerfordairyexcellence.org/tl_files/cde/pdf/Stephenson. Industry Study Paper 4-2-07.pdf. Cited 7 Aug 2009.

  • Taylor, E., Arrango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Massey, D., & Pellegrino, A. (1996). International migration and community development. Population Index, 62(3), 397–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. J., Moran-Taylor, M. J., & Ruiz, D. R. (2006). Land, ethnic, and gender change: Transnational migration and its effects on Guatemalan lives and landscapes. Geoforum, 37(1), 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Global Commission on International Migration. (2005). Migration in an interconnected world: New directions for action. Geneva: The Global Commission on International Migration, The United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L., I. I., Geoghegan, J., & Foster, D. (Eds.). (2004). Integrated land-change science and tropical deforestation in the southern Yucatán: Final frontiers. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, B. E. (2005). Uniting two cultures: Latino immigrants in the Wisconsin dairy industry. Working Paper 121, Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, University of California-San Diego. San Diego: University of California.

  • Vermont Farm Bureau. (2005). Dairy industry labor survey. Unpublished survey. Montpelier, VT: Vermont Farm Bureau.

  • Vermont Land Trust. (2008). Vermont land trust 2007–2008 annual report. Montpelier, VT: Vermont Land Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vester, H. F. M., Lawrence, D., Eastman, J. R., Turner, B. L., Calmé, S., Dickson, R., et al. (2007). Land change in the southern Yucatán and Calakmul Biosphere Reserve: Effects on habitat and biodiversity. Ecological Applications, 17(4), 989–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, K., Ehrhart, C., de Sherbinin, A., Adamo, S., & Chai-Onn, T. (2009). In search of shelter: Mapping the effects of climate change on human migration and displacement. Report published by CARE. Available from http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/documents/clim-migr-report-june09_final.pdf. Cited 18 May 2010.

  • Zapata, E. (1996). Modernization, adjustment, and peasant production: A gender analysis. Latin American Perspectives, 23(1), 118–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research in Campeche, Mexico was carried out in 2007 with the generous cooperation of the interviewed men and women, whom we thank profusely. We also thank various ECOSUR-Chetumal personnel who assisted in the research, especially Dalia Hoil Villalobos. At Utah State University, Danielle Babbel assisted with data collection and Anne Winters assisted with data entry. Funding was provided by a Utah State University New Faculty Research Grant and an Association of American Geographers’ Anne U. White Research Grant. Collection of the 1997 and 2003 Mexican data was part of the Southern Yucatán Peninsular Region project (1997–2009), with core funding provided by NASA’s LCLUC program and NSF’s BCS program. For the research in Vermont, USA, we extend our thanks to the many farmworkers, farmers, service providers, and other community members who provided invaluable access, insight, and analysis in the development of the larger project from which the case study is drawn. Funding was provided by an NSF Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant, a Robert & Patricia Switzer Foundation Environmental Leadership Fellowship, and a Ford Foundation Community Forestry Doctoral Research Fellowship. We thank Holger Weissenberger, of ECOSUR-Chetumal, for his assistance with the map for this research brief. Lastly, we thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Radel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Radel, C., Schmook, B. & McCandless, S. Environment, transnational labor migration, and gender: case studies from southern Yucatán, Mexico and Vermont, USA. Popul Environ 32, 177–197 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0124-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0124-y

Keywords

Navigation