Allen, M. (2003). Bush: ‘We Found’ banned weapons. Washington Post. May 31, 2003. Page A1.
Althaus, S. L. (1998). Information effects in collective preferences. American Political Science Review,
Arpan, L. M., & Raney, A. A. (2003). An experimental investigation of news source and the Hostile Media Effect. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly,
Balz, D. (2004). Candidates use arms report to make case. Washington Post, October 8, 2004.
Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior,
Baum, M. A., & Gussin, P. (2007). In the eye of the beholder: How information shortcuts shape individual perceptions of bias in the media. Quarterly Journal of Political Science,
Baum, M. A., & Groeling, T. (2009). Shot by the messenger: Partisan cues and public opinion regarding national security and war. Political Behavior,
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis,
Bullock, J. (2007). Experiments on partisanship and public opinion: Party cues, false beliefs, and Bayesian updating. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review,
Christen, C. T., Kannaovakun, P., & Gunther, A. C. (2002). Hostile media perceptions: Partisan assessments of press and public during the 1997 United Parcel Service Strike. Political Communication,
Cohen, F., Ogilvie, D. M., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2005). American Roulette: The effect of reminders of death on support for George W. Bush in the 2004. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy,
Cunningham, B. (2003). Re-thinking objectivity. Columbia Journalism Review July/August 2003, 24–32.
Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Druckman, J. N., & Kam, C. D. (2010). Students as experimental participants: A defense of the ‘Narrow Data Base.’ In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Green, J. H. Kuklinski, & A. Lupia (Eds.), Handbook of experimental political science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens’ conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science,
Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Shah, D. V. (2003). The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived media bias. Political Psychology,
Fournier, R. (2004). First Lady Bashes Kerry Stem Cell Stance. Associated Press August 9, 2004.
Fritz, B., Keefer, B., & Nyhan, B. (2004). All the President’s spin: George W. Bush, the media and the truth. New York: Touchstone.
Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Interpreting Iraq: Partisanship and the meaning of facts. Journal of Politics,
Gerber, A. S., & Huber, G. A. (2010). Partisanship, political control, and economic assessments. American Journal of Political Science,
Gilens, M. (2001). Political ignorance and collective policy preferences. American Political Science Review,
Gollust, S. E., Lantz, P. M., & Ubel, P. A. (2009). The polarizing effect of news media messages about the social determinants of health. American Journal of Public Health,
Greenberg, J., & Jonas, E. (2003). Psychological motives and political orientation–the left, the right, and the rigid: comment on Jost et al. (2003). Psychological Bulletin,
Gunther, A. C., & Chia, S. C.-Y. (2001). Predicting pluralistic ignorance: The hostile media perception and its consequences. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly,
Gunther, A. C., & Schmitt, K. (2004). Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication,
Gussin, P., & Baum, M. A. (2004). In the eye of the beholder: An experimental investigation into the foundations of the hostile media phenomenon. Paper presented at 2004 meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
Gussin, P., & Baum, M. A. (2005). Issue bias: How issue coverage and media bias affect voter perceptions of elections. Paper presented at 2005 meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington D.C.
Hartman, T. K., & Weber, C. R. (2009). Who said what? The effects of source cues in issue frames. Political Behavior,
Hill, P. (2006). House or Senate shake-up likely to end tax cuts. Washington Times October 5, 2006.
Howell, W. G., & West, M. R. (2009). Educating the public. Education Next,
Jerit, J., & Barabas, J. (2006). Bankrupt rhetoric: How misleading information affects knowledge about social security. Public Opinion Quarterly,
Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003a). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin,
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003b). Exceptions that prove the rule-using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies: Reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003). Psychological Bulletin,
Kriner, D., & Howell, W. G. (N.d.). Political elites and public support for war. Unpublished manuscript.
Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
Kuklinski, J. H., & Quirk, P. J. (2000). Reconsidering the rational public: cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, & S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Understanding and expanding the limits of political rationality. London: Cambridge University Press.
Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Schweider, D., & Rich, R. F. (1998). ‘Just the Facts, Ma’am’: Political facts and public opinion. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schweider, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. The Journal of Politics,
Kull, S., Ramsay, C., & Lewis, E. (2003). Misperceptions, the media, and the Iraq war. Political Science Quarterly,
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin,
Landau, M. J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., et al. (2004). Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science,
Lebo, M. J., & Cassino, D. (2007). The aggregated consequences of motivated ignorance and the dynamics of partisan presidential approval. Political Psychology, 28(6), 719–746.
Lee, T.-T. (2005). The liberal media myth revisited: An examination of factors influencing perceptions of media bias. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,
Linzer, D. (2006). Lawmakers cite weapons found in Iraq. Washington Post June 22, 2006.
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2000). Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, & Samuel. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Understanding and expanding the limits of political rationality. London: Cambridge University Press.
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review,
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mankiw, G. (2003). Testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. May 13, 2003.
McGregor, H. A., Lieberman, J. D., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., Simon, L., et al. (1998). Terror management and aggression: Evidence that mortality salience motivates aggression against worldview-threatening others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Meffert, M. F., Chung, S., Joiner, A. J., Waks, L., & Garst, J. (2006). The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. Journal of Communication,
Milbank, D. (2003). For Bush tax plan, a little inner dissent. Washington Post February 16, 2003. Page A4.
Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science,
Molden, D. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Motivated thinking. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Peffley, M., & Hurwitz, J. (2007). Persuasion and resistance: Race and the death penalty in America. American Journal of Political Science,
Pew Research Center for the People & the Press (2005). Public more critical of press, but goodwill persists: Online newspaper readership countering print losses. Poll conducted June 8–12, 2005 and released June 26, 2005. Downloaded December 6, 2008 from http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/248.pdf
Popkin, S. (1991). The reasoning voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Priest, D., & Pincus, W. (2004). U.S. ‘Almost All Wrong’ on weapons. Washington Post October 7, 2004.
Program on International Policy Attitudes (2004). PIPA-knowledge networks poll: Separate realities of Bush and Kerry supporters. Downloaded December 30, 2009 from http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/Iraq/IraqRealities_Oct04/IraqRealities%20Oct04%20quaire.pdf
Program on International Policy Attitudes (2006). Americans on Iraq: Three years on. Downloaded December 30, 2009 from http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/mar06/USIraq_Mar06-quaire.pdf
Pyszczynski, T., Abdollahi, A., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., & Weise, D. (2006). Mortality salience, martyrdom, and military might: The great satan versus the axis of evil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2003). In the wake of 9/11: The psychology of terror
. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
Redlawsk, D. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics,
Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. W., & Emmerson, K. M. (Forthcoming). The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever ‘Get It’?” Political Psychology.
Robertson, L. (2007). “Supply-side Spin.” Factcheck.org. June 11, 2007. Downloaded December 6, 2008 from http://www.factcheck.org/taxes/supply-side_spin.html
Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1980). The perserverance of beliefs: Empirical and normative considerations. In R. A. Shweder (Ed.), Fallible judgment in behavioral research: New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science (Vol. 4, pp. 17–36). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Shani, D. (2006). Knowing your colors: Can knowledge correct for partisan bias in political perceptions? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
Shapiro, R. Y., Bloch-Elkon, Y. (2008). Do the facts speak for themselves? Partisan disagreement as a challenge to democratic competence. Critical Review 20(1–2):115–139.
Sides, J., & Citrin, J.(2007). “How large the huddled masses? The causes and consequences of public misperceptions about immigrant populations.” Paper presented at the 2007 annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science,
Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the ‘Beirut Massacre’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Wells, C., Reedy, J., Gastil, J., & Lee, Carolyn. (2009). Information distortion and voting choices: The origins and effects of factual beliefs in initiative elections. Political Psychology,
Weiss, R., & Fitzgerald, M. (2004). Edwards, first lady at odds on stem cells. Washington Post August 10, 2004.
Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.