Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate human behaviour during the 2012 Northern Italy Earthquakes. Furthermore, the current study used Kuligowski and Mileti’s (Fire Saf J 44:487–496, 2009) extended model and the Social Attachment Model as a framework to explain the behavioural responses. The study included 1839 participants who were affected by the earthquake occurred in the Emilia-Romagna region (Italy) on 20 May 2012. The most frequent behavioural responses during the earthquake were moving to another room of the house, escaping from home, and waiting in bed. According to Kuligowski and Mileti’s (Fire Saf J 44:487–496, 2009) extended model, perceived risk was associated with evacuation, and emergency preparedness was related to more efficient and effective responses during the earthquake. In line with the Social Attachment Model, affiliation behaviours were more frequent than flight behaviours, while, contrary to predictions, the social context did not influence emotional responses, evacuation behaviour, and search for protection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguirre BE (2005) Commentary on ‘Understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster’. Emergency evacuations panic and social psychology. Psychiatry 68:121–129. doi:10.1521/psyc.2005.68.2.121
Aguirre BE, Wenger D, Vigo G (1998) A test of emergent norm theory of collective behavior. Sociol Forum 13:301–320. doi:10.1023/A:1022145900928
Becker JS, Paton D, Johnston DM, Ronan KR (2012) A model of household preparedness for earthquake: how individuals make meaning of earthquake information and how this influences preparedness. Nat Hazards 64:107–137. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0238-x
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (2000) On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics. J Educ Behav Stat 25:60–83. doi:10.3102/10769986025001060
Binu J, Mawson AR, Payton M, Guignard JC (2008) Disaster mythology and fact: Hurricane Katrina and social attachment. Public Health Rep 123:555–566
Bourque LB, Russell LA, Goltz JD (1993) Human behavior during and immediately after the earthquake. In: Bolton PA (ed) The Loma Prieta California earthquake of October 17 1989: public response. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC, pp B3–B22
Brody LR (2000) The socialization of gender differences in emotional expression: display rules, infant temperament, and differentiation. In: Fischer AH (ed) Gender and emotion: social psychological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 24–47
Dash N (2002) Decision-making under extreme uncertainty: rethinking hazard perceptions and action. Florida International University Florida, Florida
Drury J, Cocking C (2007) The mass psychology of disasters and emergency evacuations: a research report and implications for practice. University of Sussex, Sussex
Drury J, Cocking C, Reicher S (2009a) Everyone for themselves? A comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors. Br J Soc Psychol 48:487–506. doi:10.1348/014466608X357893
Drury J, Cocking C, Reicher S (2009b) The nature of collective resilience: survivor reactions to the 2005 London bombings. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 27:66–95
Ekman P (1992) An argument for basic emotions. Cogn Emot 6(3–4):169–200
Federal Emergency Management Agency (2003) Be informed: earthquakes. The Ready Campaign. http://www.ready.gov/earthquakes. Accessed 10 Feb 2012
Gladwin H, Peacock WG (1997) Warning and evacuation: a night for hard houses. In: Peacock WG, Morrow BH, Gladwin H (eds) Hurricane Andrew: ethnicity gender and sociology of disasters. Routledge, London, pp 52–74
Gosling SD, Vazire S, Srivastava S, John OP (2004) Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. Am Psychol 59:93–104. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93
Guha-Sapir D, Vos F (2011) Earthquakes an epidemiological perspective on patterns and trends. In: Spence R, So E, Scawthorn C (eds) Human casualties in earthquakes. Springer, New York, pp 13–24
Heath SE, Kass PH, Beck AM, Glickman LT (2001) Human and pet-related risk factors for household evacuation failure during a natural disaster. Am J Epidemiol 153:659–665. doi:10.1093/aje/153.7.659
Hobfoll SE, London P (1986) The relationship of self-concept and social support to emotional distress among women during war. J Soc Clin Psychol 4:189–203. doi:10.1521/jscp.1986.4.2.189
Johnson NR (1987) Panic at ‘The Who Concert Stampede’: an empirical assessment. Soc Probl 34:362–373
Johnson NR (1988) Fire in a crowded theatre: a descriptive investigation of the emergence of panic. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 6:7–26
Kobbeltved T, Brun W, Johnsen BH, Eid J (2005) Risk as feelings or risk and feelings? A cross-lagged panel analysis. J Risk Res 8:417–437. doi:10.1080/1366987042000315519
Kuligowski ED, Mileti DS (2009) Modeling pre-evacuation delay by occupants in World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 on September 11, 2001. Fire Saf J 44:487–496. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.10.001
Lee JEC, Lemyre L (2009) A social-cognitive perspective of terrorism risk perception and individual response in Canada. Risk Anal 29:1265–1280. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01264.x
Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch ES (2001) Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull 127:267–286. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
Mawson AR (2005) Understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster. Psychiatry 68:95–113. doi:10.1521/psyc.2005.68.2.95
Ohta Y, Ohashi H (1985) Field survey on occupant behavior in an earthquake. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 3:147–160
Ortony A, Clore GL, Collins A (1988) The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge University Press, New York
Peek-Asa C, Ramirez M, Seligson H, Shoaf K (2003) Seismic, structural, and individual factors associated with earthquake related injury. Inj Prev 9:62–66
Prati G, Pietrantoni L, Zani B (2011) A social-cognitive model of pandemic influenza H1N1 risk perception and recommended behaviors in Italy. Risk Anal 31:645–656. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01529.x
Prati G, Catufi V, Pietrantoni L (2012) The Umbria-Marche earthquake: emotional and behavioral reactions to earth tremors. Disasters 36:439–451. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01264.x
Quarantelli ER (2001) Sociology of panic. In: Smelser N, Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Pergamon, New York NY, pp 1020–1130
Sherman MF, Peyrot M, Magda LA, Gershon RRM (2011) Modeling pre-evacuation delay by evacuees in World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 on September 11, 2001: a revisit using regression analysis. Fire Saf J 46:414–424. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2011.07.001
Sime JD (1985) Movement towards the familiar: person and place affiliation in a fire entrapment setting. Environ Behav 17:697–724. doi:10.1177/0013916585176003
Solberg C, Joffe H, Rossetto T (2008) How people behave in anticipation of and during earthquakes: a review of the social science literature on what drives this behaviour. Paper presented at the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China
Turner R, Killian LM (1987) Collective behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Villegas J, Matyas CJ, Srinivasan S, Cahyunto I, Thapa B, Pennington-Gray L (2012) Cognitive and affective responses of Florida tourists after exposure to hurricane warning messages. Advance online publication. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0119-3
Wagner R (1996) A case control study of risk factors for physical injury during the mainshock of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake in the county of Santa Cruz, California. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Acknowledgments
This research was supported in part by grants from the SUR of ECO, Generalitat de Catalunya, which awarded a fellowship (2012FI_B1 00157) to Elisa Saccinto for her Doctorate Programme. The authors thank Gianluca Pescaroli for his assistance with this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prati, G., Saccinto, E., Pietrantoni, L. et al. The 2012 Northern Italy Earthquakes: modelling human behaviour. Nat Hazards 69, 99–113 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0688-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0688-9