Skip to main content
Log in

Gender-Dependent Actions of the Histone Deacetylase Blocker Sodium Valproate on Olfactory Learning in 129Sv Mice during the Early Postnatal Period

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The processes of histone acetylation in the brain underlie both the mechanisms supporting the long-term stable effects of early experience, transmitted to offspring generations by epigenetic inheritance, and learning. However, the role of acetylation in learning has previously been studied only in adult animals: high levels of learning can be linked with high levels of histone H3 acetylation in the brain. The role of acetylation processes in the mechanisms of early learning has not been addressed. We report here our studies of the effects of blockade of histone deacetylation with sodium valproate, which increases the level of acetylation of histone H3, on the outcome of training to olfactory discrimination in 8-day-old mice of strain 129Sv, which have low levels of learning with simulation of maternal grooming. Four doses of sodium valproate, given from day 3 to day 6 of postnatal development, were found to have gender-dependent actions: there were selective improvements in learning in males but not females, though females showed this seen after repeated administration of physiological saline. The possible epigenetic mechanisms underlying these gender-related differences are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. A. Aleksandrova, I. Yu. Zaraiskaya, and K. V. Anokhin, “Comparative analysis of the formation of behavior in mice of two inbred strains,” in: Behavior and Behavioral Ecology of Mammals, KMK, Moscow (2005), pp. 349–351.

    Google Scholar 

  2. O. V. Burenkova, E. A. Aleksandrova, and I. Yu. Zaraiskaya, “Deprivation of 129Sv mouse offspring of their mothers in early ontogeny improves olfactory learning with simulation of maternal grooming,” Byull. Eksperim. Biol. Med., 153, No. 5, 724–726 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. V. Lobanov, O. N. Khokhlova, L. A. Zakharova, et al., “A model for analysis of neurotoxic actions on embryonic development in terms of assessment of somatosensory maturation in mice,” Toksikol. Vestn., No. 2, 22–25 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. W. Bredy, R. A. Humpartzoomian, D. P. Campaign, and M. J. Meaney, “Partial reversal of the effect of maternal care on cognitive function through environmental enrichment,” Neuroscience, 118, 571–576 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. T. W. Bredy and M. Barad, “The histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid enhances acquisition, extinction, and reconsolidation of conditioned fear,” Learn. Mem., 15, No. 1, 39–45 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. I. Brouette-Lahlou, E. Vernet-Maury, and M. Vigouroux, “Role of pups’ ultrasonic calls in a particular maternal behavior in Wistar rat: pups’ anogenital licking,” Behav. Brain Res., 50, No. 1–2, 147–154 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. F. A. Champagne, J. P. Curley, E. B. Keverne, and P. P. Bateson, “Natural variations in postpartum maternal care in inbred and outbred mice,” Physiol. Behav., 91, No. 2–3, 325–334 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. W. Fischle, Y. Wang, and C. D. Allis, “Histone and chromatin cross-talk,” Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 15, No. 2, 172–183 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. R. A. Hodgson, D. H. Guthrie, and G. B. Varty, “Duration of ultrasonic vocalization in the isolated rat pup as a behavioral measure: sensitivity to anxiolytic and antidepressant drugs,” Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 88, No. 3, 341–348 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. C. U. Johannessen and S. I. Johannessen, “Valproate: past, present, and future,” CNS Drug Rev., 9, No. 2, 199–216 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. J. M. Levenson, K. J. O’Riordan, K. D. Brown, et al., “Regulation of histone deacetylation during memory formation in the hippocampus,” J. Biol. Chem., 2790, No. 39, 40,545–40,559 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. I. Matsuda, H. Mori, and M. Kawata, “Epigenetic mechanisms are involved in sexual differentiation of the brain,” Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord., 13, No. 3, 163–171 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. M. J. Meaney, “Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 24, 1161–1192 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. E. K. Murray, A. Hien, G. J. de Vries, and N. G. Forger, “Epigenetic control of sexual differentiation of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis,” Endocrinology, 150, No. 9, 4241–4247 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. B. D. Strahl and C. D. Allis, “The language of covalent histone modifications,” Nature, 403, No. 6765, 41–45 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. R. M. Sullivan, J. L. McGaugh, and M. Lon, “Norepinephrine-induced plasticity and one-trial olfactory learning in neonatal rats,” Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res., 60, No. 2, 219–228 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. H. W. Tsai, P. A. Grant, and E. F. Rissman, “Sex differences in histone modifications in the neonatal mouse brain,” Epigenetics, 4, No. 1, 47–53 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. C. G. Vecsey, J. D. Hawk, K. M. Lattal, et al., “Histone deacetylase inhibitors enhance memory and synaptic plasticity via CREB: CBP-dependent transcriptional activation,” J. Neurosci., 27, 6128–6140 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. C. D. Walker, K. Kudreikis, A. Sherrerd, and C. C. Johnston, “Repeated neonatal pain influences maternal behavior, but not stress responsiveness in rat offspring,” Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res., 140, No. 2, 253–261 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. I. C. Weaver, N. Cervoni, F. A. Champagne, et al., “Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior,” Nat. Neurosci., 7, No. 8, 847–854 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. I. C. Weaver, F. A. Champagne, S. E. Brown, et al., “Reversal of maternal programming of stress responses in adult offspring through methyl supplementation: altering epigenetic marking later in life,” J. Neurosci., 25, No. 47, 11,045–11,054 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. S. H. Yeh, C. H. Lin, and P. W. Gean, “Acetylation of nuclear factor-kB in rat amygdala improves long-term but not short-term retention of fear memory,“ Mol. Pharmacol., 65, 1286–1292 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. V. Burenkova.

Additional information

Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 99, No. 2, pp. 212–220, February, 2013.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burenkova, O.V., Aleksandrova, E.A. & Zaraiskaya, I.Y. Gender-Dependent Actions of the Histone Deacetylase Blocker Sodium Valproate on Olfactory Learning in 129Sv Mice during the Early Postnatal Period. Neurosci Behav Physi 44, 1008–1013 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-014-0017-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-014-0017-0

Keywords

Navigation