Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Critical Analysis of Forest Policies of Pakistan: Implications for Sustainable Livelihoods

  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pakistan has very low forest cover, but these forests are very diverse in nature and of significant importance for the livelihood security of millions of rural people who live in and around these forests. Policies, institutions and processes form the context within which individuals and households construct and adapt livelihood strategies, on the other hand these institutionally shaped livelihood strategies may have an impact on the sustainability of natural resource use. The present paper aims to critically analyse the forest policies of Pakistan. Implications for sustainable forest management and livelihood security of forest dependent people are also given. The first forest policy of Pakistan was announced in 1955 followed by the forest policies of 1962, 1975, 1980, 1988 as part of the National Agricultural Policy, 1991, and the latest in 2001. Most of the forest policies were associated with the change of government. There was much rhetoric in some recent policies regarding the concept of “participation” and “sustainable livelihoods” but in practice these policies are also replica of the previously top-down, autocratic and non-participatory forest policies. Pakistan needs to develop a sustainable, workable, research-based, and people-friendly forest policy enable to catering to the changing needs of stakeholders including government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADB: 1995, Forestry sector project (Pakistan). The Asian Development Bank, Manila. http://www.adb.org/Documents/News/1995/nr1995126.asp

    Google Scholar 

  • ADB: 2001, Economic Indicators of Pakistan, The Asian Development Bank, Manila.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, J. and Mahmood, F.: 1998, Changing Perspective on Forest Policy; Policy that Works for Forests and People, Pakistan Country Case Study, IUCN, Islamabad, Pakistan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banuri, T. and Marglin, F. A.: 1993, Who Will Save the Forests? Knowledge, Power and Environmental Destruction Zed Books London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, P. and Sinha, S.: 2001, Linking Development with Democratic Processes on India: Political Capital and Sustainable Livelihoods Analysis, Natural Resource Perspectives Number 68. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. and Conway, G.: 1992, Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS Discussion Paper 296, Brighton: Institute for Development Studies, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFID: 2000, Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. Department for International Development, London. http://www.livelihood.org/info/info_guidancesheets.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupar, M. and Bedenoch, N.: 2002, Environment, Livelihoods and Local Institutions: Decentralization in Mainland Southeast Asia, World Resource Institute (WRI), USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durr, C.: 2002, The contribution of forests and trees to poverty alleviation. Series IC No. 3, Inter-Cooperation, P.O. Box. 6724, 3001 Berne, Switzerland.

  • FAO: 2001, State of the world forests 2001. Information division, Food and Agricultural Organization. Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, I. A.: 2002, Making Forest Policy Work, Kluwer Academic Publishers: The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • FSMP: 2003, Forest Sector Master Plan: National perspective. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Cooperatives, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiser, U.: 2000, Working on Power: Actors Practices of Improving Control Over Forest Resources in North West Pakistan, Proceedings of the Conference on Modern South Asian Studies, Edinburgh.

  • Government of Pakistan: 2003, Economic Survey of Pakistan. Ministry of Finance, Islamabad, Pakistan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Pakistan: 2001, National Forest Policy 2001. Ministry of Environment. Islamabad, Pakistan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobley, M.: 1987, Involving the Poor in Forest Management: Can it be Done? The Nepal-Australia Project Experience. ODI network paper 5c.

  • Hassan, L.: 2001, Analysing Institutional Set-up of Forest Management in Pakistan, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad, Pakistan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, S. and Khan, S.: 2000, Commonalities and Contradictions between JDR, PFRI, MTR FSP, and MTR FMC, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation SDC- Inter-Cooperation -, Peshawar, Pakistan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICIMOD: 1998, Land policy, land management and land degradation in HKH region: Pakistan country study. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Developmrent (ICIMOD), Kathmandu Nepal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. R. and Naqvi, A.: 2000, The Environment – Poverty Nexus: An Institutional Analysis, Sustainable Development Policy Institute Working Paper # 49: SDPI, Pakistan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. M.: 2002, Natural Resources and Decentralization in Nicaragua: Are Local Governments Up to the Job?, Word Development 30:1, 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poffenberger, M.: 2000, Communities and forest management in South Asia. A regional profile of the working group on community involvement in forest management. IUCN Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Qazi, I. A.: 1994, Pakistan: country and forests. Handbook of forestry. Pak. Agric. Research Council, Islamabad, Pakistan.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAFI: 2000, Charter of Demands. Sarhad Awami Forestry Ittehad. Sungi Development Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton, S., Campbell, B., Wollenberg, E. and Edmounds, D.: 2002, Devolution and Community Based Natural Resource Management: Creating Space for Local People to participate and Benefit. Natural Resource Perspectives No. 76, Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon, C. S.: 2002, ‘Sustainability in ecological economics, ecology and livelihoods: A review' Progress in Human Geography, 24(4), 521–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steimann, B.: 2003, Decentralization and Participation in Forestry Sector in NWFP, Pakistan: The Role of the State, Master Thesis. Department of Geography, Zurich University, Switzerland.

  • Suleri, A. Q.: 2002, The State of Forests in Pakistan through a Pressure-State-Response Framework. Working Paper Series No. 82. SDPI Islamabad, Pakistan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleri, A. Q.: 2002a, Regional Study on Forest Policy and Institutional Reform, Final Report of the Pakistan Case Study. Asian Development Bank, Manila.

  • UNCED: 1992, Pakistan National Report to the United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Environment and Urban Affairs Division, Government of Pakistan.

  • UNEP: 2002, Global Environment Outlook 3: http://www.unep.org/GEO/index.htm(United Nations Environment Programme).

  • Warner, K.: 2000, Forestry and sustainable livelihoods. Unasylva-No. 202. Forests, food security and sustainable livelihoods. Vol. 51-2000/3.

  • Wily, L.: 1997, Villagers as forest managers and governments “Learning to let go” The case of Duru-Haitemba & Mgori Forests in Tanzania, Forest Participation Series No. 9. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Babar Shahbaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shahbaz, B., Ali, T. & Suleri, A.Q. A Critical Analysis of Forest Policies of Pakistan: Implications for Sustainable Livelihoods. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 12, 441–453 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9050-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9050-9

Keywords

Navigation