Skip to main content
Log in

The role of religion in the debate about physician-assisted dying

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the role of religious belief in public debate about physician-assisted dying and argues that the role is essential because any discussion about the way we die raises the deepest questions about the meaning of human life and death. For religious people, such questions are essentially religious ones, even when the religious elements are framed in secular political or philosophical language. The paper begins by reviewing some of the empirical data about religious belief and practice in the United States and Europe. It then explores the question of the proper role of religion in public policy debate and concludes with a discussion of the importance of religion and religious practices in considerations of how we die.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Charbonnier, Ralph. 2008. The contribution of the Protestant Church in Germany to the pluralist discourse in bioethics: The case of stem cell research. Christian Bioethics 14: 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelini-Pont, Blandine. 2005. Religion in the public sphere: Challenges and Opportunities. Brigham Young University Law Review 2005: 611–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald, Thomas Nagel, Robert Nozick, John Rawls, Thomas Scanlon, and Judith Jarvis Thomson. 1997. Assisted suicide: The philosophers’ brief. New York Review of Books 44(5): 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. Moral consciousness and communicative action, trans. Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholsen, intro. by Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Halman, Loek, and Veerle Draulans. 2006. How secular is Europe? British Journal of Sociology 57: 263–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King, Dana E., and Bruce Bushwick. 1994. Beliefs and attitudes of hospital inpatients about faith healing and prayer. Journal of Family Practice 39: 349–352.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Forum on Religion, and Public Life. 2006. Many Americans uneasy with mix of religion and politics. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Forum on Religion, Public Life. 2008a. U.S. religious landscape survey. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Forum on Religion, Public Life. 2008b. U.S. religious landscape survey: religious beliefs and practices: diverse and politically relevant. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1996. Political liberalism, paperback ed. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1997. The idea of public reason revisited. University of Chicago Law Review 64: 765–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinhauser, Karen E., Nicholas A. Christakis, Elizabeth C. Clipp, Maya McNeilly, Lauren McIntyre, and James A. Tulsky. 2000. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA 284: 2476–2482.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William E. Stempsey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stempsey, W.E. The role of religion in the debate about physician-assisted dying. Med Health Care and Philos 13, 383–387 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-010-9267-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-010-9267-y

Keywords

Navigation