Skip to main content
Log in

Benford’s Law Applied to Hydrology Data—Results and Relevance to Other Geophysical Data

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Benford’s Law gives the expected frequencies of the digits in tabulated data and asserts that the lower digits (1, 2, and 3) are expected to occur more frequently than the higher digits. This study tested whether the law applied to two large earth science data sets. The first test analyzed streamflow statistics and the finding was a close conformity to Benford’s Law. The second test analyzed the sizes of lakes and wetlands, and the finding was that the data did not conform to Benford’s Law. Further analysis showed that the lake and wetland data followed a power law. The expected digit frequencies for data following a power law were derived, and the lake data had a close fit to these expected digit frequencies.

The use of Benford’s Law could serve as a quality check for streamflow data subsets, perhaps related to time or geographical area. Also, with the importance of lakes as essential components of the water cycle, either Benford’s Law or the expected digit frequencies of data following a power law could be used as an authenticity and validity check on future databases dealing with water bodies. We give several applications and avenues for future research, including an assessment of whether the digit frequencies of data could be used to derive the power law exponent, and whether the digit frequencies could be used to verify the range over which a power law applies. Our results indicate that data related to water bodies should conform to Benford’s Law and that nonconformity could be indicators of (a) an incomplete data set, (b) the sample not being representative of the population, (c) excessive rounding of the data, (d) data errors, inconsistencies, or anomalies, and/or (e) conformity to a power law with a large exponent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benford F (1938) The law of anomalous numbers. Proc Am Philos Soc 78(4):551–572

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGroot M, Schervish M (2002) Probability and statistics, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaconis P (1976) The distribution of leading digits and uniform distribution mod 1. Ann Probab 5(1):72–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake PD, Nigrini MJ (2000) Computer assisted analytical procedures using Benford’s Law. J Account Educ 18(2):127–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill TP (1995) Base-invariance implies Benford’s Law. Proc Am Math Soc 123(3):887–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontorovich AV, Miller SJ (2005) Benford’s Law, values of L-functions, and the 3x+1 problem. Acta Arith 120(3):269–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagarias J, Soundararajan K (2006) Benford’s Law for the 3x+1 function. J Lond Math Soc 74(2):273–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leemis LM, Schmeiser BW, Evans DL (2000) Survival distributions satisfying Benford’s Law. Am Stat 54(3):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehner B, Döll P (2004) Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands. J Hydrol 296(1–4):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ley E (1996) On the peculiar distribution of the US Stock Indices first digits. Am Stat 50(4):311–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman MEJ (2005) Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemp Phys 46(5):323–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigrini MJ (1996) A taxpayer compliance application of Benford’s Law. J Am Tax Assoc 18:72–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigrini MJ (2005) An assessment of the change in the incidence of earnings management around the Enron–Andersen episode. Rev Account Financ 4(1):92–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigrini MJ, Mittermaier LJ (1997) The use of Benford’s Law as an aid in analytical procedures: Auditing. J Pract Theory 16(2):52–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkham RS (1961) On the distribution of first significant digits. Ann Math Stat 32(4):1223–1230

    Google Scholar 

  • Raimi R (1969) The peculiar distribution of first digits. Sci Am 221(6):109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raimi R (1976) The first digit problem. Am Math Mon 83(7):521–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2006) Scientific fraud: Egg on his face, 5 January 2006

  • Wallace WA (2002) Assessing the quality of data used for benchmarking and decision-making. J Gov Financ Manag 51(3):16–22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark J. Nigrini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nigrini, M.J., Miller, S.J. Benford’s Law Applied to Hydrology Data—Results and Relevance to Other Geophysical Data. Math Geol 39, 469–490 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-007-9109-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-007-9109-5

Keywords

Navigation