Skip to main content
Log in

A simple heuristic for obtaining pareto/NBD parameter estimates

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an influential study, Schmittlein et al. (1987) proposed the pareto/negative binomial distribution (P/NBD) model to predict purchase behavior of customers. Despite its recognized relevance, this model has some drawbacks as follows: (1) it does not allow a zero transaction rate, (2) it assumes convenient but not necessarily realistic gamma distributions for the transaction and drop-out rates across customers, and (3) the estimation procedure requires complicated computations. The purpose of this study is to relax the assumption that purchases and drop-out rates are distributed according to a gamma distribution and propose a simple estimation procedure for the individual parameters that can be applied even if the number of customers is large. A simulation exercise and empirical applications to real datasets compare the simple model proposed with the P/NBD model. The results show that the simple procedure is better in cases where the number of transactions and/or the observation period is large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batislam, E. P., Denizel, M., & Filiztekin, A. (2007). Empirical validation and comparison of models for customer base analysis. Internat. J. Res. Marketing, 24(3), 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bemmaor, A. C., & Glady, N. (2012). Modeling purchasing behavior with sudden death: a flexible customer lifetime model. Management Science, 58(5), 1012–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1988). Repeat Buying (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fader, P.S., & Hardie, B.G.S. (2001). Forecasting Repeat Sales at CDNOW: A Case Study. Part 2 of 2. Interfaces 31(May–June) S94–S107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fader, P.S., & Hardie, B.G.S. (2005). A Note on Deriving the Pareto/NBD Model and Related Expressions. http://brucehardie.com/notes/009/.

  • Fader, P. S., Hardie, B. G. S., & Lee, K. L. (2005b). Counting your customers the easy way: an alternative to the Pareto/NBD model. Marketing Science, 24(3), 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerath, K., Fader, P. S., & Hardie, B. G. S. (2011). New perspectives on customer death. Using a generalization of the Pareto/NBD model. Marketing Science, 30(5), 866–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, S.H., & Liu, J.L. (2007). The MCMC Approach for Solving the Pareto/NBD Model and Possible Extensions, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Natural.

  • Reinartz, W., & Kumar, V. (2002). The Mismanagement of Customer Loyalty. Harvard Business Review (July), pp. 86–97.

  • Schmittlein, D. C., Morrison, D. G., & Colombo, R. (1987). Counting your customers: who are they and what will they do next? Management Science, 33(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. S., Borle, S., & Jain, D. C. (2009). A generalized framework for estimating customer lifetime value when customer lifetimes are not observed. Quant Marketing Economy, 7(2), 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Marshall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marshall, P. A simple heuristic for obtaining pareto/NBD parameter estimates. Mark Lett 26, 165–173 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9272-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9272-z

Keywords

Navigation