Is public discourse about language policy really public discourse about immigration? A corpus-based study
- Shannon Fitzsimmons-Doolan
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The pluralist narrative of language policies suggests that language policies are influenced by public perceptions of immigrants (Darder 2004; González 2000; Pavlenko 2002; Valdés 1997). This paper investigates the relationship between newspaper discourse about language policies and newspaper discourse about immigration. It asks how much key, lexical overlap exists between the discourses. This study compared Arizona newspaper corpora representing discourse about language policies and discourse about immigration to evaluate the degree of similarity in discourses. Keyword analysis, identifying unusually frequent words, was used to assess the degree of important semantic overlap across topic-based corpora. Four topic-based corpora were constructed from the newspapers published between January 1999 and October 2007. Surprisingly, little key, lexical overlap was found between language policy corpora and immigration corpora. In light of the findings, advantages and limitations of various methodologies for language policy questions are discussed—corpus-based methods in particular.
- Agar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York: William Morrow and Company Inc.
- Baker, P. (2004). ‘Unnatural acts’: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debates on gay male law reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(1), 88–106. CrossRef
- Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. New York: Continuum.
- Barker, G., & Giles, H. (2002). Who supports the English only movement?: Evidence for misconceptions about Latino group vitality. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 23(5), 353–370. CrossRef
- Barker, G., & Giles, H. (2004). English-only policies: Perceived support and social limitation. Language and Communication, 24(1), 77–95.
- Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257. CrossRef
- Crawford, J. (2000). Proposition 227: A new phase of the English only movement. In R. D. González & I. Melis (Eds.), Language ideologies: Critical perspectives on the official English movement: Vol. 1. Education and the social implications of official language (pp. 28–61). Urbana, IL and Mahwah, NJ: National Council of Teachers of English and Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Darder, A. (2004). The politics of language: An introduction. Latino Studies 2(2), 231–236.
- Dunning, T. (1993). Accurate methods for the statistic of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61–74.
- Enslinn, A., & Johnson, S. (2006). Language is the news: Investigating representations of “Englishness” using WordSmith Tools. Corpora, 1(2), 153–186. CrossRef
- Gabrielatos, C., & Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the U.K. Press, 1996–2005. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(1), 5–38. CrossRef
- González, R. D. (2000). Introduction. In R. D. González & I. Melis (Eds.), Language ideologies: Critical perspectives on the official English movement: Vol. 1. Education and the social implications of official Language (pp. xxvii–xlvii). National Council of Teachers of English and Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc: Urbana, IL and Mahwah, NJ.
- Gutierriez, K. D., Asato, J., Pacheco, M., Moll, L., Olson, K., Horng, E. L., et al. (2002). Sounding American: The consequences of new reforms on English language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(3), 328–343. CrossRef
- Hill, J. (2001). The racializing function of language panics. In R. D. González & I. Melis (Eds.), Language ideologies: Critical perspectives on the official English movement: Vol. 2. History, theory, and policy (pp. 245–267). Urbana, IL and Mahwah, NJ: National Council of Teachers of English and Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Honig, B. (2003). Democracy and the foreigner. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Kemppanen, H. (2004). Keywords and ideology in translated history texts: A corpus based analysis. Across Language and Cultures, 5(1), 86–106.
- McEnery, T., Xiao, R., & Tono, Y. (2006). Corpus-based language studies: An advanced resource book. New York: Routledge.
- McGroarty, M. (2006). Neoliberal collusion or strategic simultaneity: On multiple rationales for language in education policies. Language Policy, 5(1), 3–13. CrossRef
- Migration Policy Institute. (2009). 2007 American community survey and census data on the foreign born by state. http://www.migrationinformation.org/datahub/acscensus.cfm. Accessed 26 Apr 2009.
- Oberhuber, F., Barenreuter, C., Krzyanowski, M., Schonbauer, H., & Wodak, R. (2005). Debating the European constitution: On representations of Europe/the EU in the press. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(2), 227–271. CrossRef
- Olsen, L. (1998). The Unz/Tuchman “English for children” initiative: A new attack on immigrant children and the schools. Multicultural Education, 5(3), 11–13.
- Palozzi, V. (2005). Assessing voter attitude toward language policy issues in the United States. Language Policy, 5, 15–39.
- Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. (2009). A portrait of unauthorized immigrants in the United States, Report. Pew Hispanic Center. http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/107.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr 2009.
- Pavlenko, A. (2002). We have room but for one language here: Language and national identity in the US at the turn of the 20th century. Multilingua, 21, 163–196.
- Ricento, T. (2005). Problems with the “language as resource” discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the U.S.A. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3), 348–368. CrossRef
- Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Schmidt, R. (2000). Language policy and identity politics in the United States. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
- Schmidt, R. (2002). Racialization and language policy: The case of the U.S.A. Multilingua, 21, 141–161.
- Schmidt, R. (2006). Political theory and language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 95–110). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
- Scott, M. (1997). PC analysis of key words—and key keywords. System, 25(2), 233–245. CrossRef
- Scott, M. (1998). WordSmith tools manual. Version 2.0. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Scott, M. (2004). WordSmith tools manual. Version 5.0. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Scott, M., & Tribble, C. (2006). Textual patterns: Key words and corpus linguistics in language education. Studies in corpus linguistics (22). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Seale, C., Boden, S., Williams, S., Lowe, P., & Steinberg, D. (2007). Media constructions of sleep and sleep disorders: A study of UK national newspapers. Social Science & Medicine, 65, 418–430. CrossRef
- Shiffman, H. (1996). Linguistic culture and language policy. New York: Routledge.
- Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. New York: Routledge.
- Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Stritikus, T., & Garcia, E. (2005). Revisiting the bilingual education debate from the perspectives of parents: Policy, practice, and matches or mismatches. Educational Policy, 19(5), 729–744. CrossRef
- Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis: Computer assisted studies of language and culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Toolan, M. (2006). Top keyword abridgements of short stories: A corpus linguistic resource? Journal of Literary Semantics, 35(2), 181–194. CrossRef
- Valdés, G. (1997). Bilinguals and bilingualism: Language policy in an anti-immigrant age. International Journal of Society and Language, 127, 25–52. CrossRef
- Williams, R. (1976). Keywords. London: Fontana.
- Wright, W. (2005a). English language learners left behind in Arizona: The nullification of accommodations in the intersection of federal and state policies. Bilingual Research Journal, 29(1), 1–29.
- Wright, W. (2005b). The political spectacle of Arizona’s Proposition 203. Educational Policy, 19(5), 662–700. CrossRef
- Is public discourse about language policy really public discourse about immigration? A corpus-based study
Volume 8, Issue 4 , pp 377-402
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Language policy
- Keyword analysis
- Author Affiliations
- 1. English Department, Applied Linguistics Program, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA