Skip to main content
Log in

Design and development of a neutron/X-ray combined computed tomography system at Missouri S&T

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new method for non-destructive analysis has been developed using a combined neutron/X-ray imaging system at the Missouri Science & Technology Reactor (MSTR). The interactions of neutrons and X-ray photons with matter produce differing characteristic information, resulting in distinctly different visual images. In order to obtain a more comprehensive picture of the structural and compositional data for a desired object, a prototype imaging system has been designed which utilizes neutron and X-ray imaging simultaneously without obstructing the beam geometry for each imaging mechanism. The current system is optimized for the imaging of small to medium sized objects of 0.5–50 mm. This new imaging capability in place at the MSTR promises great advances in the field of non-destructive testing, especially for nuclear engineering, nuclear medical science, and material science research. In an imaging object, a range of atomic number values and thermal cross-sections may be present. Where multiple materials having similar atomic number and differing thermal cross-section or vice versa may be present, exclusive neutron or X-ray analysis may exhibit shortcomings in distinguishing interfaces. However, fusing the neutron image and X-ray image into a combined image offers the strengths of both and may provide a superior method of analysis. In this paper, a novel combined X-ray and neutron imaging system will be introduced for superior analysis of certain imaging objects. Design details of experimental set-up and examples of preliminary imaging tests from individual modality will be detailed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Belgya T, Kis Z, Szentmiklósi L, Kasztovszky Z, Festa G, Andreanelli L, DePascale MP, Pietropaolo A, Kudejova P, Schulze R, Materna T, The Ancient Charm Collaboration (2008) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 278:713. doi:10.1007/s10967-008-1510-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Belgya T, Kis Z, Szentmiklósi Z, Kasztovszky Z, Kudejova P, Schulze R, Materna T, Festa G, Caroppi PA, The Ancient Charm Collaboration (2008) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 278:751. doi:10.1007/s10967-008-1605-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Szentmiklósi Z, Belgya T, Revay Z, Kis Z (2010) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 286:501. doi:10.1007/s10967-010-0765-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Triolo R, Giambona G, Celso FL, Ruffo I, Kardjilov N, Hilger A, Manke I, Paulke A (2010) Conserv Sci Cult Herit 10:143–158

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balasko M, Kuba A, Nagy A, Kiss Z, Rodek L, Ruskó L (2005) Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 542:22–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vontobel P, Lehmann E, Carlson WD (2005) IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 52:338–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Neutron vs. X-ray computed tomography: comparative study on the example of a violin (2010) Interaction between wood science and conservation of cultural heritage, Turkey. http://www.woodculther.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/COST-IE0601-2010-Izmir_Mannes.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2011

  8. Yasuda R, Matsubayashi M, Nakata M, Harada K, Amano H, Sasajima F, Nishi M, Horiguchi Y (2005) IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 52:313–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Characterization of the Neutron Flux Energy Spectrum at the Missouri University of Science and Technology Research Reactor (MSTR) (2010) Missouri University of Science & Technology, Rolla. http://scholarsmine.mst.edu. Accessed 13 Aug 2010

  10. Poludniowski G, Landry G, DeBlois F, Evans PM, Verhaegen F (2009) Phys Med Biol 54:N433. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/54/19/N01

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tremsin AS, Feller WB, Downing RG (2005) Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 539:278–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. X-ray mass attenuation coefficients (2012) National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg. http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/XrayMassCoef/tab4.html Accessed 12 Jan 2012

  13. Experimental nuclear reaction data (EXFOR/CSISRS) (2011) Brookhaven National Lab, New York. http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/exfor/exfor00.htm. Accessed 14 Sept 2012

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Bill Bonzer and other MSTR staffs for assistance with experiments. The authors also would like to acknowledge help of Jeffrey Divis, Michael Crabtree and Michael Acton. The efforts here presented are conducted under Missouri S&T Nuclear Engineering program with substantial support have been received from the Department of Energy through General Scientific Infrastructure Support Program and partial support from the Center for Bone and Tissue Repair and Regeneration, Missouri University of Science & Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyoung K. Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sinha, V., Avachat, A.V. & Lee, H.K. Design and development of a neutron/X-ray combined computed tomography system at Missouri S&T. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 296, 799–806 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-2062-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-2062-x

Keywords

Navigation