Abstract
The concept map tool set forth by Novak and colleagues is underutilized in education. A meta-analysis has encouraged teachers to make extensive use of concept mapping, and researchers have advocated computer-based concept mapping applications that exploit hyperlink technology. Through an NSF sponsored geosciences education grant, middle and secondary science teachers participated in professional development to apply computer-based concept mapping in project-based learning (PBL) units that investigated local watersheds. Participants attended a summer institute, engaged in a summer through spring online learning academy, and presented PBL units at a subsequent fall science teachers’ convention. The majority of 17 teachers who attended the summer institute had previously used the concept mapping strategy with students and rated it highly. Of the 12 teachers who continued beyond summer, applications of concept mapping ranged from collaborative planning of PBL projects to building students’ vocabulary to students producing maps related to the PBL driving question. Barriers to the adoption and use of concept mapping included technology access at the schools, lack of time for teachers to advance their technology skills, lack of student motivation to choose to learn, and student difficulty with linking terms. In addition to mitigating the aforementioned barriers, projects targeting teachers’ use of technology tools may enhance adoption by recruiting teachers as partners from schools as well as a small number that already are proficient in the targeted technology and emphasizing the utility of the concept map as a planning tool.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baitz I (2009) Concept mapping in the online learning environment: a proven learning tool is transformed in a new environment. Int J Learn 16:286–291
Brown J, Collins A, Duguid P (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res 18:32–42
Campbell L, Williams-Rossi D (2012) The way they want to learn. Sci Teacher 79(1):52–56
Cañas A, Hill G, Lott J (2003) Support for constructing knowledge models in CmapTools (Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 93-02). Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, Pensicola, http://cmap.ihmc.us/Documentation/WhitePapers.php. Accessed 12 November 2011
Cassata A, French L (2006) Using concept mapping to facilitate metacognitive control in preschool children. In: Cañas A, Novak J (eds) Concept maps: theory, methodology, technology. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on concept mapping, San José, Costa Rica, http://cmc.ihmc.us/cmc2006Papers/cmc2006-p144.pdf. Accessed 12 November 2011
CmapTools Documentation (n.d.) Description of various collaboration features of CmapTools, http://cmap.ihmc.us/Documentation. Accessed 12 November 2011
Colley K (2008) Project-based science instruction: a primer. The Sci Teacher 75(8):33–37
Ebenezer J, Kaya O, Ebenezer D (2011) Engaging students in environmental research projects: perceptions of fluency with innovative technologies and levels of scientific inquiry abilities. J Res Sci Teach 48:94–116. doi:10.1002/tea.20387
Fallik O, Eylon BS, Rosenfeld S (2008) Motivating teachers to enact free-choice project-based learning in science and technology (PBLSAT): effects of a professional development model. J Sci Teacher Educ 19:565–591. doi:10.1007/s10972-008-9113-8
Glesne C (1999) Becoming qualitative researchers: an introduction. Addison Wesley Longman, New York
Harris J, Mishra P, Koehler M (2009) Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: curriculum-based technology integration reframed. J Res Technol Educ 41:393–416
Hewson P (2007) Teacher professional development in science. In: Abell S, Lederman N (eds) Handbook of research on science education. Routledge, New York, pp 1179–1203
Hung D, Looi C, Koh T (2004). Situated cognition and communities of practice: first-person “lived experiences” vs. third-person perspectives. Educ Technol Soc 7(4):193–200
Johnson CC (2006) Effective professional development and change in practice: barriers science teachers encounter and implication for reform. Sch Sci Math 106:150–161
Jonassen D (2000) Computers as mindtools for schools. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Kelly J, Stetson R (2010) Making a difference: using concept maps in professional development. Southeastern Teacher Educ J 3(1):5–10
Kopcha TJ (2010) A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring and communities of practice. Educ Tech Res Dev 58:175–190. doi:10.1007/s11423-008-9095-4
Liang L, Ebenezer J, Yost D (2010) Characteristics of preservice teachers’ online discourse: the study of local streams. J Sci Educ Technol 19:69–79. doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9179-x
Markham T (with Larmer J, Ravitz J) (2006). Project based learning: a guide to standards-focused project based learning for middle and high school teachers, 2nd edn. Buck Institute for Education, Novato
McLellan H (1994) Situated learning: continuing the conversation. Educ Technol 34(8):7–8
Micheals S, Shouse A, Schweingruber H (2007) Ready, set, science!. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
National Research Council (2006) Learning to think spatially. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Nesbit JC, Adesope OO (2006) Learning with concept and knowledge maps: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res 76:413–448
Novak JD (2003) The promise of new ideas and new technology for improving teaching and learning. Cell Biol Educ 2:122–132
Novak JD (2010) Learning, creating, and using knowledge, 2nd edn. Routlege, New York
Novak JD, Cañas AJ (2008) The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, http://cmap.ihmc.us/publications/researchpapers/theorycmaps/theoryunderlyingconceptmaps.htm. Accessed 12 November 2011
Patton M (2002) Qualitative evaluation and research. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Rye JA (2001) Enhancing teachers’ use of technology through professional development on electronic concept mapping. J Sci Educ Technol 10:223–235
Science Educators Troubled by State of Science Education (2012) NSTA reports 23(5):9
Szymanski M, Morrell P (2009) Situated cognition and technology. Int J Learn 15(12):55–58
Tergan SO, Gräber W, Neumann A (2006) Mapping and managing knowledge and information in resource-based learning. Innovat Educ Teach Int 43:327–336. doi:10.1080/14703290600973737
Ueckert CW, Gess-Newsome J (2008) Active learning strategies: three activities to increase student involvement in learning. Sci Teacher 75(10):48–52
Weizman A, Shwartz Y, Fortus D (2008) The driving question board. Sci Teacher 75(9):33–37
Acknowledgments
Funding support was provided by the National Science Foundation (GEO 0807249). The authors are grateful to Mr. Todd Ensign and Mr. Stefan Smolski for their contributions to this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rye, J., Landenberger, R. & Warner, T.A. Incorporating Concept Mapping in Project-Based Learning: Lessons from Watershed Investigations. J Sci Educ Technol 22, 379–392 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9400-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9400-1