What Circumstances Prompt a Workplace Discussion in Medical Evaluations for Back Pain?
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Purpose: To determine how frequently workplace topics emerge in the interactions between patients and providers in an evaluation for low back pain (LBP) and to determine its association with patient and provider characteristics. Methods: Adults with work-related LBP (N = 97; 64 % male; median age = 38) completed a demographic questionnaire and a survey of disability risk factors, then agreed to audio-taping of their visits with a participating occupational healthcare provider (n = 14). Utterance-level verbal exchanges were categorized by trained coders using the Roter interaction analysis system. In addition, coders flagged any instance of workplace discussion between patients and providers. Results: Workplace discussions occurred in 51 % of visits, and the most frequent topic was physical job demands. Workplace discussions were more frequent among the oldest and youngest patients and when patients were seen by providers who were more patient-centered and made more efforts to establish patient rapport and engagement. However, patients reporting numerous disability risk factors and workplace concerns in the pre-visit questionnaire were no more likely to discuss workplace topics with their providers (p > 0.05). Only the patient-centered orientations of providers and patients remained statistically significant predictors in multivariate modeling (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Workplace discussions are facilitated by a patient-centered orientation and by efforts to establish patient engagement and rapport, but workplace discussions are no more frequent among patients with the most significant workplace concerns. Screening questionnaires and other assessment tools may be helpful to foster workplace discussions to overcome possible barriers for returning to work.
- Crook J, Milner R, Schultz IZ, Stringer B. Determinants of occupational disability following a low back injury: a critical review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12:277–95. CrossRef
- Shaw WS, Pransky G, Fitzgerald TE. Early prognosis for low back disability: intervention strategies for health care providers. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23:815–28. CrossRef
- Waddell G, Burton AK, Main CJ. Screening to identify people at risk of long-term incapacity for work: a conceptual and scientific review. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 2003.
- Steenstra IA, Verbeek JH, Heymans MW, Bongers PM. Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62:851–60. CrossRef
- Hartvigsen J, Lings S, Leboeuf-Yde C, Bakketeig L. Psychosocial factors at work in relation to low back pain and consequences of low back pain; a systematic, critical review of prospective cohort studies. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:e2.
- Feuerstein M, Shaw WS, Lincoln AE, Miller VI, Wood PM. Clinical and workplace factors associated with a return to modified duty in work-related upper extremity disorders. Pain. 2003;102:51–61. CrossRef
- Shaw WS, van der Windt DA, Main CJ, Loisel P, Linton SJ, The “Decade of the Flags” Working Group. Early patient screening and intervention to address individual-level occupational factors (“blue flags”) in back disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:64–80. CrossRef
- Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:607–31. CrossRef
- Pransky G, Katz JN, Benjamin K, Himmelstein J. Improving the physician role in evaluating work ability and managing disability: a survey of primary care practitioners. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:867–74. CrossRef
- Rainville J, Pransky G, Indahl A, Mayer EK. The physician as disability advisor for patients with musculoskeletal complaints. Spine. 2005;30:2579–84. CrossRef
- Shaw WS, Pransky G, Winters T. The Back Disability Risk Questionnaire (BDRQ) for work-related acute back pain: prediction of unresolved problems at 3-month follow-up. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51:185–94. CrossRef
- American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines: evaluation and management of common health problems and functional recovery in workers (2nd edition), pp. 677-85. Elk Grove Village, Illinois: author, 2008.
- Kellerman R, Kirk L. Principles of the patient-centered medical home. Am Fam Physician. 2007;76:774–5.
- Institute of Medicine (IOM). Hurtado MP, Swift EK, Corrigan JM, editors. Committee on the National quality report on Health Care Delivery, Board on Health Care Services. Envisioning the national health care quality report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.
- Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centeredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1087–110. CrossRef
- Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K, et al. Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:1516–28. CrossRef
- Roter DL, Stewart M, Putnam S, Lipkin M, Stiles W, Inui T. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1997;270:350–5. CrossRef
- Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:51–61. CrossRef
- Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ. 2001;323:908–11. CrossRef
- Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM. Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997;277:553–9. CrossRef
- Charlton CR, Dearing KS, Berry JA, Johnson MJ. Nurse practitioners’ communication styles and their impact on patient outcomes: an integrated literature review. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008;20:382–8. CrossRef
- Dasinger LK, Krause N, Thompson PJ, Brand RJ, Rudolph L. Doctor proactive communication, return-to-work recommendation, and duration of disability after a workers’ compensation low back injury. J Occup Environ Med. 2001;43:515–25. CrossRef
- Kosny A, Franche RL, Pole J, Krause N, Côté P, Mustard C. Early healthcare provider communication with patients and their workplace following a lost-time claim for an occupational musculoskeletal injury. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16:27–39. CrossRef
- Shaw WS, Zaia A, Pransky G, Winters T, Patterson WB. Perceptions of provider communication and patient satisfaction for treatment of acute low back pain. J Occup Environ Med. 2005;47:1036–43. CrossRef
- Shaw WS, Pransky G, Winters T, Tveito TH, Larson SM, Roter DL. Does the presence of psychosocial “yellow flags” alter patient-provider communication for work-related, acute low back pain? J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51:1032–40. CrossRef
- Street RL Jr, Krupat E, Bell RA, Kravitz RL, Haidet P. Beliefs about control in the physician-patient relationship: effect on communication in medical encounters. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:609–16. CrossRef
- Krupat E, Bell RA, Kravitz RL, Thom D, Azari R. When physicians and patients think alike: patient-centered beliefs and their impact on satisfaction and trust. J Fam Pract. 2001;50:1057–62.
- Krupat E, Rosenkranz SL, Yeager CM, Barnard K, Putnam SM, Inui TS. The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39:49–59. CrossRef
- Roter D, Larson S. The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;46:243–51. CrossRef
- Sandvik M, Eide H, Lind M, Graugaard PK, Torper J, Finset A. Analyzing medical dialogues: strength and weakness of Roter’s interaction analysis system (RIAS). Patient Educ Couns. 2002;46:235–41. CrossRef
- Shaw WS, Pransky G, Roter DL, Winters T, Tveito TH, Larson SM. The effects of patient-provider communication on 3-month recovery from acute low back pain. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24:16–25. CrossRef
- Janssen M, Nabih A, Moussa W, Kawchuk GN, Carey JP. Evaluation of diagnosis techniques used for spinal injury related back pain. Pain Res Treat. 2011;2011:478798.
- Turner JA, Franklin G, Fulton-Kehoe D, Sheppard L, Wickizer TM, Wu R, Gluck JV, Egan K. Worker recovery expectations and fear-avoidance predict work disability in a population-based workers’ compensation back pain sample. Spine. 2006;31:682–9. CrossRef
- Holtermann A, Hansen JV, Burr H, Søgaard K. Prosgnostic factors for long-term sickness absence among employees with neck-shoulder and low-back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010;36:34–41. CrossRef
- Chou R, Qaseem A, Owens DK, Shekelle P. Diagnostic imaging for low back pain: advice for high-value health care from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:181–9.
- Nicholas NK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ. the “Decade of the Flags” Working Group. Early identification and management of psychological risk factors (“yellow flags”) in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther. 2011;91:737–53. CrossRef
- Shaw WS, Main CJ, Johnston V. Addressing occupational factors in the management of low back pain: implications for physical therapist practice. Phys Ther. 2011;91:777–89. CrossRef
- Costa-Black KM, Loisel P, Anema JR, Pransky G. Back pain and work. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24:227–40. CrossRef
- McPhillips-Tangum CA, Cherkin DC, Rhodes LA, Markham C. Reasons for repeated medical visits among patients with chronic back pain. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:289–95. CrossRef
- What Circumstances Prompt a Workplace Discussion in Medical Evaluations for Back Pain?
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Volume 23, Issue 1 , pp 125-134
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Low back pain
- Patient-provider communication
- Workplace risk factors
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA, 01748, USA
- 2. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA
- 3. Harvard School of Public Health, 158 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA