Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Why England? Demographic factors, structural change and physical capital accumulation during the Industrial Revolution

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Economic Growth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Why did England industrialize first? And why was Europe ahead of the rest of the world? Unified growth theory in the tradition of Galor and Weil (2000, American Economic Review, 89, 806–828) and Galor and Moav (2002, Quartely Journal of Economics, 177(4), 1133–1191) captures the key features of the transition from stagnation to growth over time. Yet we know remarkably little about why industrialization occurred much earlier in some parts of the world than in others. To answer this question, we present a probabilistic two-sector model where the initial escape from Malthusian constraints depends on the demographic regime, capital deepening and the use of more differentiated capital equipment. Weather-induced shocks to agricultural productivity cause changes in prices and quantities, and affect wages. In a standard model with capital externalities, these fluctuations interact with the demographic regime and affect the speed of growth. Our model is calibrated to match the main characteristics of the English economy in 1700 and the observed transition until 1850. We capture one of the key features of the British Industrial Revolution emphasized by economic historians — slow growth of output and productivity. Fertility limitation is responsible for higher per capita incomes, and these in turn increase industrialization probabilities. The paper also explores the availability of nutrition for poorer segments of society. We examine the influence of redistributive institutions such as the Old Poor Law, and find they were not decisive in fostering industrialization. Simulations using parameter values for other countries show that Britain’s early escape was only partly due to chance. France could have moved out of agriculture and into manufacturing faster than Britain, but the probability was less than 25%. Contrary to recent claims in the literature, 18th century China had only a minimal chance to escape from Malthusian constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemolgu D., Zilibotti F. (1997). Was prometheus unbound by chance? Risk, Diversification, and Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 105(4): 709–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen R.C. (1992) Enclosure and the Yeoman/the agricultural development of the South Midlands. Oxford, OUP, pp. 1450–1850

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen R.C. (2005a). Real wages in Europe and Asia: A first look at the long-term patterns. In: Allen R.C., Bengtsson T., Dribe M. (eds) Living standards in the past. Oxford, OUP

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. C. (2005b). Capital Accumulation, Technological Change, and the Distribution of Income during the British Industrial Revolution. Nuffield College working paper.

  • Allen, R. C. (2006). Agricultural Productivity and Rural Incomes in England and the Yangtze Delta, c. 1620- c. 1820. Nuffield College working paper.

  • Allen, R. C., Bassino, J.-P., Ma, D., Moll-Murata, C., & van Zanden, J. L. (2005). Wages, Prices, and Living Standards in China, Japan, and Europe, 1738–1925. Working paper.

  • Antras P., Voth H.-J. (2003). Factor prices and productivity growth during the British industrial revolution. Explorations in Economic History 38, 52–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton T.S. (1964). The Industrial Revolution, 1760–1830. Oxford, OUP

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, G. (1990). An economic history of the English poor law, 1750–1850. Cambridge: CUP.

  • Broadberry, S. & Gupta, B. (2005a). The Early Modern Great Divergence: Wages, Prices and Economic Development in Europe and Asia, 1500–1800. Warwick working paper.

  • Broadberry, S. & Gupta, B. (2005b). Cotton Textiles and the Great Divergence: Lancashire, India and Shifting Competitive Advantage, 1600–1850. Warwick working paper.

  • Braudel, F. (1973). Capitalism and Material Life, 1400–1800. New York, Harper and Row.

  • Cervellati M., Sunde U. (2005). Human capital formation, life expectancy, and the process of development. American Economic Review 95(5): 1653–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesnais F. (1992). The demographic transition. Oxford, OUP

    Google Scholar 

  • CIA (2005). CIA fact book 2005: http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/

  • Clark, G. (2003a). The Great Escape: The Industrial Revolution in Theory and in History. Unpublished manuscript, UC Davis.

  • Clark G. (2003b). Agricultural productivity, prices and wages. In: Mokyr J.(ed) Encylopedia of Economic History, Vol. 1. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 92–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark G. (2005). The Condition of the working-class in England, 1209–2004. Journal of Political Economy 113(6): 1307–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole W.A. (1973). Eighteenth-century economic growth revisited. Explorations in Economic History 10, 327–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crafts N.F.R. (1977). Industrial revolution in England and France: Some thoughts on the question, ’Why Was England First?’. Economic History Review, Second Series 30(3): 429–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crafts N.F.R. (1985). British economic growth during the industrial revolution. Oxford, OUP

    Google Scholar 

  • Crafts N.F.R. (1995). Exogenous or endogenous growth? The industrial revolution reconsidered. Journal of Economic History 55(4): 745–772

    Google Scholar 

  • Crafts N.F.R., Harley K. (1992). Output growth and the British industrial revolution: A restatement of the Crafts-Harley view. Economic History Review 45, 703–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crafts N.F.R., Harley K. (2000). Simulating the two views of the industrial revolution. Journal of Economic History 60:819–841

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond J. (2004). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York,Viking

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein C. (1981). Capital accumulation and the industrial revolution. In: Floud R., McCloskey D.(eds) The Economic history of Britain since 1700, Vol. I. Cambridge, CUP, pp 00–00

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel R. (1994). Economic growth, population theory, and physiology: The bearing of long-term processes on the making of economic policy. American Economic Review 84(3): 369–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Galor O. (2005). From stagnation to growth: Unified growth theory. In: Aghion P., Durlauf S.(eds) Handbook of economic growth, Vol. 1A. Amsterdam, North-Hollandpp 00–00

    Google Scholar 

  • Galor O., Moav O. (2002). Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4): 1133–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galor O., Moav O. (2004). From physical to human capital accumulation: Inequality and the process of development. Review of Economic Studies 71, 1001–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galor O., Mountford A. (2003). Trade, Demographic Transition, and the Great Divergence: Why are a Third of People Indian or Chinese? Hebrew University Working Paper.

  • Galor O., Weil D. (2000). Population, technology and growth: From the malthusian regime to the demographic transition and beyond. American Economic Review 90, 806–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboy E. (1932). Demand as a factor in the industrial revolution. reprinted. In: Cole A.H.(ed) Facts and factors in economic history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone J. (2002). Efflorescences and economic growth in world history. Rethinking the “Rise of the West” and the industrial revolution. Journal of World History 13(2): 323–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajnal J. (1965). European marriage in perspective. In: Glass D.V., Eversley D.E.C.(eds) Population in history. London, Arnold

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen G.D., Prescott E. (2002). Malthus to solow. American Economic Review 92(4): 1205–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horrell S. (1996). Home demand and British industrialization. Journal of Economic History 56(3): 561–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2001). Was an industrial revolution inevitable? Economic growth over the very long run. Advances in Macroeconomics, 1(2).

  • King P. (1997). Pauper inventories and the material lives of the poor in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. In: Hitchcock T., King P., Sharpe P.(eds) Chronicling poverty: The voices and strategies of the english poor. Basingstoke, Houndsmills

    Google Scholar 

  • Kögel T., Prskawetz A. (2001), Agricultural procutivity growth and escape from the malthusian trap. Journal of Economic Growth 6, 337–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labrousse E., Romano R., Dreyfus F.-G. (1970). Le Prix Du Froment en France 1726–1913. Paris, SEVPEN

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerlöf N.-P. (2003). From malthus to modern growth: Can epedemics explain the three regimes. International Economic Review 44(2): 755–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagerlöf N.-P. (2006). The Galor–Weil model revisited: A quantitative exploration. Journal of Economic Dynamics 9(1): 116–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landes D. (1999). The wealth and poverty of nations: Why some are so rich and some so poor. Harvard, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindert P.H. (2000). When did inequality rise in Britain and America?. Journal of Income Distribution 9(1): 11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindert P.H., Williamson J.G. (1982). Revising england’s social tables, 1688–1812. Explorations in Economic History 19(4): 385–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, A. (2003). The world economy: Historical statistics. Paris, France: Development Centre of the OECD.

  • Matsuyama K. (1991). Increasing returns, industrialization, and indeterminacy of equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2): 617–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuyama K. (2002). The rise of mass consumption societies. Journal of Political Economy 110(5): 1035–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey D.N., John N. (1984). Corn at interest: The extent and cost of grain storage in medieval england. American Economic Review 74(1): 174–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell B.R., Jones H.G. (1971). Second abstract of British historical statistics. Cambridge, CUP

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr J. (1977). Demand vs. supply in the industrial revolution. Journal of Economic History 37(4): 981–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr J. (1990). The lever of riches: Technological creativity and economic progress. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr J. (1999). Editor’s introduction. The new economic history and the industrial revolution. In: Mokyr J.(ed) The British industrial revolution: An economic perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. (2002). Why was the industrial revolution a European phenomenon? Supreme Court Economic Review, 9.

  • Mokyr, J., & Voth, H.-J. (2008). Understanding Growth in Europe, 1700–1870—First Industrializations, Unified Growth Theory, and Beyond. In: S. Broadberry, Kevin O’Rourke, Cambridge economic history of europe, Vol. I, Cambridge, forthcoming.

  • Mosk C. (1976). Fecundity, infanticide, and food consumption in Japan. Explorations in Economic History 15(3): 269–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy K.M., Shleifer A., Vishny R.W. (1989a). Income distribution, market size, and industrialization. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104(3): 537–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy K.M., Shleifer A., Vishny R. (1989b). Industrialization and the big push. Journal of Political Economy 97(5): 1003–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North D.C., Thomas R.P. (1973). The rise of the western world: A new economic history. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeranz K. (2000). The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer P.M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98(5): 71–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozman G. (1973). Urban Networks in Ch’ing China and Tokugawa Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokey N. (2001). A Quantitative model of the British industrial revolution, 1780–1850. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 55, 55–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strulik, H. (2006), Patterns of Demographic Development and Structural Change. University of Copenhagen working paper.

  • Temin P., Voth H.-J. (2005). Credit rationing and crowding out during the industrial revolution: Evidence from hoare’s Bank 1702–1862. Explorations in Economic History 42(3): 325–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voth H.-J. (2003). Living standards during the industrial revolution: An economist’s guide. American Economic Review 93(2): 221–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries J. (1984). European urbanization 1500–1800. London, Methuen

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson J.G. (1984). Why was British growth so slow during the Industrial Revolution?. Journal of Economic History 44(3): 687–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley E.A. (1983). The growth of population in eighteenth-century England: A conundrum resolved. Past and Present 98, 121–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley E.A. (1988). Continuity, chance and change: The character of the industrial revolution in England. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley E.A., Davies R.S., Oeppen J., Schofield R. (1997). English population history from family reconstitution 1580–1837. Cambridge, CUP

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley E.A., Schofield R. (1981). The population history of England, 1541–1871: A reconstruction. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweimüller J. (2000). Schumpeterian entrepreneurs meet Engel’s Law: The impact of inequality on innovation-driven growth. Journal of Economic Growth 5(2): 185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Economics Department, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, c/Ramon Trias Fargas 25-27, E-08005, Barcelona, Spain

    Nico Voigtländer

  2. ICREA and Economics Department, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, c/Ramon Trias Fargas 25–27, E-08005, Barcelona, Spain

    Hans-Joachim Voth

Authors
  1. Nico Voigtländer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hans-Joachim Voth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Voigtländer, N., Voth, HJ. Why England? Demographic factors, structural change and physical capital accumulation during the Industrial Revolution. J Econ Growth 11, 319–361 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-006-9007-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-006-9007-6

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Search

Navigation