Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effective mathematics teaching in Finnish and Swedish teacher education discourses

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores effective mathematics teaching as constructed in Finnish and Swedish teacher educators’ discourses. Based on interview data from teacher educators as well as data from feedback discussions between teacher educators and prospective teachers in Sweden and Finland, the analysis shows that several aspects of the recent international reform movements are visible in the discourses in both countries. However, the Swedish teacher educators tend to conceptualize effective teaching as interactions with individual children, building on students’ ideas and emanating mathematics from everyday situations, while the Finnish teacher educators stress the importance of a clear presentation of mathematics, routines and homework as well as specific goals for every lesson. The results of this cross-cultural study cannot be generalized to the two countries but rather show interesting conceptualizations of effective teaching, adding to international theory building.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, J., & Davis, Z. (2006). Opening another black box: Researching mathematics for teaching in mathematics teacher education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 270–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P., Ryve, A., Hemmi, K., & Sayers, J. (2014). PISA, TIMSS and Finnish mathematics teaching: An enigma in search of an explanation. Educational Studies in Mathematics,. doi:10.1007/s10649-014-9545-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Wiliam, D., & Johnson, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy. Final Report. King’s College: London.

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesen, J., Helenius, O., Bergqvist, E., Bergqvist, T., Lithner, J., Palm, T., et al. (2014). Developing mathematical competence: From the intended to the enacted curriculum. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 72–87. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramald, R., Hardman, F., & Leat, D. (1995). Initial teacher trainees and their views of teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, C., Wang, T., Perry, B., Wong, N.-Y., & Cai, J. (2007). Comparison and contrast: Similarities and differences of teachers’ views of effective mathematics teaching and learning from four regions. ZDM, 39(4), 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., Kaiser, G., Perry, B., & Wong, N.-Y. (Eds.). (2009a). Effective mathematics teaching from teachers’ perspectives—National and cross-national studies. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., Perry, B., Wong, N.-Y., & Wang, T. (2009b). What is effective teaching? A study of experienced mathematics teachers from Australia, the Mainland China, Hong Kong-China, and the United States. In J. Cai, G. Kaiser, B. Perry, & N.-Y. Wong (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching from teachers’ perspectives—National and cross-national studies (pp. 1–36). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. (2006). Using international research to contest prevalent oppositional dichotomies. ZDM-The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 38(5), 376–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142. doi:10.3102/01623737025002119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corey, D. L., Peterson, B. E., Lewis, B. M., & Bukarau, J. (2010). Are there any places that students use their heads? Principles of high-quality Japanese mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(5), 438–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 153–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 653–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, L. M., Kazemi, E., & Battey, D. (2007). Understanding teaching and classroom practice in mathematics. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 225–257). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givvin, K. B., Jacobs, J., Hollingsworth, H., & Hiebert, J. (2009). What is effective math teaching? International educators’ judgments of mathematics lessons from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. In J. Cai, G. Kaiser, B. Perry, & N.-Y. Wong (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching from teachers’ perspectives: National and cross-national studies (pp. 37–69). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmi, K., & Krzywacki, H. (2014). Swedish teachers’ interplay with Finnish curriculum material—Crossing the boundaries. The paper presented at International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development 2014, University of Southampton, UK, July 29–31, 2014. http://blog.soton.ac.uk/icmtrd2014/

  • Hemmi, K., & Ryve, A. (in press). The culture of the mathematics classroom during the first school years in Finland and Sweden. In B. Perry, A. Gervasoni & A. MacDonald (Eds.), Mathematics and transition to school—International perspectives. Singapore: Springer.

  • Hemmi, K., Koljonen, T., Hoelgaard, L., Ahl, L., & Ryve, A. (2013a). Analyzing mathematics curriculum materials in Sweden and in Finland: Developing an analytical tool. In Proceedings of the eighth congress of the european society for research in mathematics education. Antalya, Turkey.

  • Hemmi, K., Lepik, M., & Viholainen, A. (2013b). Analysing proof-related competences in Estonian, Finnish and Swedish mathematics curricula—Towards a framework of developmental proof. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(3), 354–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyles, C. (1988). From fragmentation to synthesis: An integrated approach to research on the teaching of mathematics. In Paper presented at the perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching.

  • Huang, R., & Li, Y. (2009). Examining the nature of effective teaching through master teachers’ lesson evaluation in China. In J. Cai, G. Kaiser, B. Perry, & N.-Y. Wong (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching from teachers’ perspectives—National and cross-national studies. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. C., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(2), 81–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. (1999). The plurality of knowledge growth in mathematics teaching. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood, & S. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp. 180–209). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. (2002). Sensitivity and challenge in university mathematics tutorial teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(1/2), 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutsson, M., Hemmi, K., Bergwall, A., & Ryve, A. (2013). School-based mathematics teacher education in Sweden and Finland: Characterizing mentor—Prospective teacher discourse. In Proceedings of the eighth congress of the european society for research in mathematics education. Antalya, Turkey.

  • Krainer, K. (2005). Editorial. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(2), 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, S. (2006). Review of “new teacher identity and regulative government: The discursive formation of primary mathematics teacher education” Tony Brown and Olwen McNamara 2005 New York: Springer. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(3), 299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2011). Elementary teachers’ thinking about good mathematics lesson. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(4), 949–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Shimizu, Y. (2009). Exemplary mathematics instruction and its development in selected education systems in East Asia. ZDM, 41(3), 257–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S. C. (2009). In search of effective mathematics teaching practice: The Malaysian mathematics teachers’ dilemma. In J. Cai, G. Kaiser, B. Perry, & N.-Y. Wong (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching from teachers’ perspectives—National and cross-cultural studies. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, P. S. (2001). Are we having fun yet? how teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(2), 175–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pehkonen, E., & Kaasila, R. (2011). Students’ conceptions of effective mathematics teaching. In K. Kislenko (Ed.), Current research on mathematical beliefs XVI. In Proceedings of the MAVI-16 conference, June 26–29, 2010, Tallinn, Estonia (pp. 218–236). Tallinn: Institute of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Tallinn University.

  • Perry, B. (2007). Australian teachers’ views of effective mathematics teaching and learning. ZDM, 39(4), 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Remilard, J. T., Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Lloyd, G. M. (2009). Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D., & Muijs, D. (1999). The effective teaching of mathematics: A review of research. School Leadership & Management, 19(3), 273–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, T. (2008). The purpose, design and use of examples in the teaching of elementary mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 149–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K. (2011). Using international study series and meta-analytic research syntheses to shope pedagogical development aimed at improving student attitute and achievement in school mathematics and science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 419–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryve, A. (2011). Discourse research in mathematics education: A critical evaluation of 108 journal articles. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 167–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryve, A., Hemmi, K., & Börjesson, M. (2013). Discourses about school-based mathematics teacher education in Finland and Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57, 132–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons. What can the world learn from educational change in Finland?. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skolverket. (2011). Diskussionsunderlag för grundskolan [Support for discussion in compulsory school]. Retrieved June 30, 2014 from http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=2538

  • Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340. doi:10.1080/10986060802229675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). Teacher’s beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P., Cooney, T., & Stinson, D. (2005). What constitutes good mathematics teaching and how it develops: Nine high school teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(2), 83–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, T. (1999). Approaching teacher Development: Practice into Theory. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood & S. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics Teacher Education: Critical International Perspectives (pp. 163–179). London: Falmer Press.

  • Yackel, E. (2000). Introduction: Perspectives on semiotics and instructional design. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolising and communicating in mathematics classrooms Perspectives on discourse, tools and instructional design (pp. 1–15). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mälardalen University, Box 883, 721 23, Västerås, Sweden

    Kirsti Hemmi & Andreas Ryve

Authors
  1. Kirsti Hemmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Ryve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirsti Hemmi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hemmi, K., Ryve, A. Effective mathematics teaching in Finnish and Swedish teacher education discourses. J Math Teacher Educ 18, 501–521 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9293-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9293-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation