Skip to main content
Log in

Fatigue crack orientation in NR and SBR under variable amplitude and multiaxial loading conditions

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The orientations of cracks as they develop in a material indicate the planes that have experienced the maximum damage. For the purpose of fatigue life analysis and prediction, these planes are referred to as the failure or critical planes. In order to study the planes on which cracks develop for different types of loading, the development of cracks was observed during constant and variable amplitude experiments using the multiaxial ring specimen. Two filled rubber materials were compared in this study: NR, which strain crystallizes, and SBR, which does not. Multiaxial test signals composed of alternating blocks of axial and torsion cycles (each of which acts on different critical planes) produced crack orientations that fell between those occurring for signals composed only of axial or of torsion cycles. Plane-specific fatigue damage parameters of cracking energy density and normal strain were evaluated for their ability to predict the experimentally observed planes of crack development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\( {\overrightarrow{r}} \) :

Unit normal vector

T Wc :

Energy release rate based on cracking energy density

W :

Strain energy density

W NH :

Strain energy density based on Neo–Hookean model

W c :

Cracking energy density

W c,raw :

Raw computed cracking energy density

α :

Angle of crack orientation from horizontal plane

ε, ε :

Strain tensor, state of strain

ε n :

Normal strain

σ :

State of stress

ϕ :

Angle of crack plane in material thickness direction

References

  1. Sun C, Gent AN, Marteny P (2000) Tire Sci Technol 28:196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roland CM, Sobieski JW (1989) Rubber Chem Technol 62:683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Klenke D, Beste A (1987) Kautsch Gummi Kunst 40:1067

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mars WV, Fatemi A (2005) Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 28:523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mars WV, Fatemi A (2006) J Mater Sci 41:7324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mars WV, Fatemi A (2007) Rubber Chem Technol 80:169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roland CM (1989) Rubber Chem Technol 62:863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mars WV, Fatemi A (2004) Exp Mech 44:136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miner MA (1945) J Appl Mech 6:159

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mars WV, Fatemi A (2005) Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 28:515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Fatemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harbour, R.J., Fatemi, A. & Mars, W.V. Fatigue crack orientation in NR and SBR under variable amplitude and multiaxial loading conditions. J Mater Sci 43, 1783–1794 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-2398-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-2398-8

Keywords

Navigation