Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Catholic Schooling on Civic Participation

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The promotion of adult civic engagement is one of the primary goals of public schools. And the putatively negative effects of private schooling on civic engagement provide one of the most fundamental motivations for publicly provided schooling. In this study, I examine the comparative effects of Catholic and public high schools on adult voter participation and volunteering in the United States. I find that students who attended Catholic high schools are actually more likely to vote, though not volunteer, as adults. These estimated effects are robust to conditioning on a rich set of individual, family and community traits. I also present two-stage least squares estimates, which provide suggestive evidence that these results are not due to selection biases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altonji, J. G., T. E. Elder and C. R. Taber. (2000). “Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools,” NBER Working Paper No. 7831, August.

  • Altonji, J. G., T. E. Elder and C. R. Taber. (2002). “An Evaluation of Instrumental Variable Strategies for Estimating the Effects of Catholic Schools,” NBER Working Paper No. 9358, November.

  • Barber, B. R. (2004). “Taking the Public Out of Education,” The School Administrator 61(5), 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R., A. Chadha and R. Montjoy. (2001).“Overreporting Voting: Why it Happens and Why It Matters,” Public Opinion Quarterly 65, 22–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bound, J., D. A. Jaeger and R. M. Baker. (1995).“Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation Between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable is Weak,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 90(430), 443–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., V. E., Lee and P. B. Holland. (1993). Catholic Schools and the Common Good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. E. (2001).“Making Democratic Education Work.” In P. E. Peterson and D. E. Campbell, (eds.), Charters, Vouchers, and Public Education. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S., T., Hoffer and S. Kilgore. (1982). High School Achievement: Public, Catholic and Private Schools. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, T. R., S. J., Ingels, S. Wu and R. Heuer. (2002).National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988: Base-Year to Fourth Follow-up Data File User’s Manual (NCES)2002-323). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee, T. S. (2004).“Are There Civic Returns to Education?” Journal of Public Economics 88(9), 1697–1720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, W. N. and R. Schwab. (1995).“Finishing High School and Starting College: Do Catholic Schools Make a Difference?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 947–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, D. and J. Ludwig. (2000).“Sex, Drugs and Catholic Schools: Private Schooling and Non-Market Adolescent Behaviors,” NBER Working Paper No. 7990, November.

  • Fischel, W. A. (2002).“An Economic Case Against Vouchers: Why Local Public Schools are a Local Public Good,” Dartmouth Economics Department Working Paper 02–01, October 20.

  • Frank, R. H. (1996).“Consumption Externalities and the Financing of Public Services.” In V. R. Fuchs (ed.), Individual and Social Responsibility: Child Care, Education, Medical Care and Long-Term Care in America, University of Chicago Press.

  • Goldberger, A. S. and G. C. Cain. (1982). “The Causal Analysis of Cognitive Outcomes in the Coleman, Hoffer and Kilgore Report,” Sociology of Educatio 55, 103–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. P. (1998). “Civic Values in Public and Private Schools.” In P. E. Petersen and B. C. Hassel (eds.), Learning from School Choice, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeley, A. M. and P. H. Rossi. (1966). The Education of Catholic Americans. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, P. D. (2003).“Time to Re-Public the Republic,” The School Administrator 60(8), 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, T. C. and N. M. Kunkel. (1984). “Catholic Schools: The Nation’s Largest Alternative School System.” In J. C. Carper and T. C. Hunt (eds.), Religious Schooling in America, Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbens, G. and J. D. Angrist. (1994). “Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects,” Econometrica 62, 289–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingels, S. and J. Baldridge. (1995). “National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988: Conducting Trend Analyses of NLS-72, HS&B and NELS:88 Seniors,” Working Paper No. 95–05, National Center for Education Statistics, January.

  • Knack, S. (1995). ȘDoes &Motor-Voter’ Work? Evidence from State-Level Data” Journal of Politics 57(3), 796–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kober, N. (1999). Lessons from Other Countries about Private School Aid. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, M. and A. Sarychev. (2000). “Why Do Governments Operate Schools?’’ Working Paper, October 31.

  • Levin, H. M. (1991).“The Economics of Educational Choice,” Economics of Education Review 10(2), 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. M. (1998).“Educational Vouchers: Effectiveness, Choice and Costs,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Mangement 17(3), 373–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, J. A. (2000). “Rise, Fall and Reasons Why: U.S. Catholic Elementary Education, 1940–1995.” In J. Youniss and J. J. Convey (eds.), Catholic Schools at the Crossroads: Survival and Transformation. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murnane, R. J., S. Newstead and R. Olsen. (1985).“Comparing Public and Private Schools: The Puzzling Role of Selectivity Bias,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 3, 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, D. (1997). “The Effects of Catholic Secondary Schooling on Educational Achievement,” Journal of Labor Economics. 15(January), 98–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, D. and J. Grogger. (2000). “Further Evidence on the Benefits of Catholic Secondary Schooling” Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs 1, 151–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poterba, J. M. (1996).“Government Intervention in the Markets for Education and Health Care: How and Why?’’ In V. R. Fuchs (ed.), Individual and Social Responsibility: Child Care, Education, Medical Care and Long-Term Care in America. University of Chicago Press.

  • Quinn, B. et al. (1982). Churches and Church Memberships in the United States, 1980. Atlanta, GA: Glenmary Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, H. S. (2002). Public Finance, 6th edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, B. D., B. A., Anderson and P. R. Abramson. (1986). “Who Overreports Voting?” American Political Science Review 80(2), 613–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. L. (1999).“Government’s Role in Primary and Secondary Education,” Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic Review First Quarter, 15–24.

  • Teixera, R.A. (1992). The Disappearing American Voter. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Census Bureau. (1996). Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1995. Washington, DC.

  • Wolf, P. J., J. P., Greene, B. Kleitz and K. Thalhammer. (2001). “Private Schooling and Political Tolerance.” In P. E. Peterson, D. E. Campbell (eds.), Charters, Vouchers, and Public Education. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahs, D., S. Pedlow, M. Morrissey, P. Marnell and B. Nichols. (1995). “High School and Beyond Fourth Follow-Up Methodology Report, NCES 95426” National Center for Education Statistics, January.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas S. Dee.

Additional information

JEL Code: I21, D72, H52

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dee, T.S. The Effects of Catholic Schooling on Civic Participation. Int Tax Public Finan 12, 605–625 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-0477-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-0477-9

Keywords

Navigation