Skip to main content
Log in

Prolonged international environmental negotiations: the roles and strategies of non-state actors in the EU

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For scholars of international environmental agreements, the role of non-state actors has been a central focus. There is a considerable literature on the influence of environmental NGOs and business groups on state behaviour and in turn international environmental outcomes. However, much less empirical work has been done to examine the influence of these actors and the strategies they can use in prolonged international environmental negotiations that last for years or decades. This article takes up this task. Drawing on a rich empirical data set on the role of European-based actors in the international climate change negotiations, it considers the influence of non-state actors in prolonged negotiations and identifies four strategies that these actors can use to influence state actors and non-state actors alike.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arts, B. (1998). The political influence of global NGOs: Case studies on the climate and biodiversity conventions. Utrecht: International Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avant, D., Finnemore, M., & Sell, S. (Eds.). (2010). Who governs the globe? (Cambridge Studies in International Relations). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., & Sikkink, K. (2008). From international relations to global society. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international relations (pp. 62–83). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. M. (2002). Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 679–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betsill, M. (2008). Environmental NGOs and the Kyoto protocol negotiations: 1995 to 1997. In M. Betsill & E. Corell (Eds.), NGO diplomacy: The influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations (pp. 43–66). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betsill, M., & Corell, E. (2008). Introduction to NGO diplomacy. In M. Betsill & E. Corell (Eds.), NGO diplomacy: The influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuermann, C., & Jager, J. (1996). Climate change politics in Germany: How long will any double dividend last? In T. O’Riordan & J. Jager (Eds.), Politics of climate change: A European perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass, L. (2007). The indispensable awkward partner: The United Kingdom in European climate policy. In P. Harris (Ed.), Europe and global climate change: Politics, foreign policy and regional cooperation (pp. 63–86). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, A., & Wettestad, J. (2003). The EU as a frontrunner on greenhouse gas emissions trading: How did it happen and will the EU succeed? Climate Policy, 3(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corell, E., & Betsill, M. (2008). Analytical framework: Assessing the influence of NGO diplomats. In E. Corell & M. Betsill (Eds.), NGO diplomacy: The influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations (pp. 19–42). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darkin, B. (2006). Pledges, politics and performance: An assessment of UK climate policy. Climate Policy, 6, 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downie, C. (2014a). Transnational actors: Nongovernmental organizations, civil society and individuals. In P. Harris (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Global Environmental Politics (pp. 176–186). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie, C. (2014b). The Politics Of Climate Change Negotiations: Strategies and Variables in Prolonged International Negotiations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Downie, C. (2014c). Transnational actors in environmental politics: Strategies and influence in long negotiations. Environmental Politics, 23(3), 376–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, M.-C. (2011). Europeanization and domestic policy concertation: How actors use Europe to modify domestic patterns of policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(5), 654–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgetti, C. (1999). From Rio to Kyoto: A study of the involvement of non-governmental organizations in the negotiations on climate change. N.Y.U Environmental Law Journal, 7, 201–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, C., & Shackley, S. (2001). The respectable politics of climate change: The epistemic communities and NGOs. International Affairs, 77(2), 329–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J., & van der Grijp, N. (2000). Perceptions of the EU’s role. In J. Gupta & M. Grubb (Eds.), Climate change and European leadership? A sustainable role for europe?. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. (2007). Europe and the politics and foreign policy of global climate change. In P. Harris (Ed.), Europe and global climate change: Politics, foreign policy and regional cooperation (pp. 3–37). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D. (2008). The state and international relations. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), Oxford handbook of international relations (pp. 41–61). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D. (2010). Rightful rules: Authority, order, and the foundations of global governance. International Studies Quarterly, 54(3), 587–613.

  • Levy, D. (2005). Business and the evolution of the climate regime. In D. Levy & P. Newell (Eds.), The business of global environmental governance (pp. 73–104). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1994). Why the European Union strengthens the state: domestic politics and international cooperation. Paper presented at the Centre for European Studies: Working Paper 52, Cambridge.

  • Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M., & Linnér, B.-O. (2014). The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: Understanding agency through governance profiles. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. doi:10.1007/s10784-014-9243-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P. (2000). Climate for change: Non-state actors and the global politics of the greenhouse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oberthur, S., & Ott, H. (1999). The Kyoto protocol: International climate policy for the 21st century. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Odell, J. (1993). International threats and internal politics: Brazil, the European community, and the United States 1985–1987. In P. Evans, H. Jacobson, & R. Putnam (Eds.), Double-edged diplomacy: International bargaining and domestic politics (pp. 233–264). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell, J., & Sell, S. (2006). Reframing the issue: The WTO coalition on intellectual property and public health, 2011. In J. Odell (Ed.), Negotiating trade: Developing countries in the WTO and NAFTA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years On. Organization Studies, 28, 1243–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringius, L. (1999). Differentiation, leaders, and fairness: Negotiating climate commitments in the European community. International Negotiation, 4(2), 133–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse-Kappen, T. (1995). Bringing transnational relations back in: Introduction. In T. Risse-Kappen (Ed.), Bringing transnational relations back in: Non-state actors, domestic structures and international institutions (pp. 3–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sebenius, J. (1994). Towards a winning climate coalition. In I. Mintzer & A. Leonard (Eds.), Negotiating climate change: The inside story of the rio convention (pp. 277–320). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, G. (2005). Actors, Coalitions and the framework convention on climate change. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjaerseth, J. B., & Skodovin, T. (2003). Climate change and the oil industry: Common problem, varying strategies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skjaerseth, J. B., & Wettestad, J. (2008). EU emissions trading: Initiation, decision-making and implementation. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tienhaara, K. (2014). Business: Corporate and industrial influence. In P. Harris (Ed.), Handbook of global environmental politics (pp. 164–175). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt, H. (2010). Emissions trading: The enthusiastic adoption of an ‘alien’ instrument? In A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. V. Asselt, T. Rayner, & F. Berkhout (Eds.), Climate change policy in the European union: Confronting the dilemmas of mitigation and adaptation? (pp. 125–144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • WWF. (1996). Policies and measures to reduce CO 2 emissions by efficiency and renewables. A preliminary survey for the period to 2005. The Netherlands: Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2009). Case study research design and methods (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. (1999). Regime effectiveness: Taking stock. In O. Young (Ed.), The effectiveness of international environmental regimes (pp. 249–279). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Downie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Downie, C. Prolonged international environmental negotiations: the roles and strategies of non-state actors in the EU. Int Environ Agreements 16, 739–755 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-015-9292-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-015-9292-7

Keywords

Navigation