Skip to main content
Log in

On Arthāpatti

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Arthāpatti (postulation) does not depend on observation of pervasion or background belief. It is certain in the sense that when S cognizes P through postulation, no other epistemic instrument (pramāṇa) would invalidate P. The Naiyāyika tries to reduce postulation to anumāna and/or tarka. I shall argue that it is neither. Due to its explanatory role, one may think that postulation plays an essential role in lakṣaṇā or indication. But this too is a misconception. Both tarka and lakṣaṇā depend on observation and background knowledge. Neither of them has the epistemic certainty postulation enjoys. I think, due to its observation-independent nature and certainty, postulation can be seen as the source of the knowledge of the truths of reason.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AVM :

Abhidhāvṛttamātṛkā by Mukulabhaṭṭa.

CP :

Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1–6, 1931–1935, Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, eds., vols. 7–8, 1958, Arthur W. Burks, ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

KKK :

Khaṇḍanakhaṇḍakhādya by Śrī Harṣa.

TCM :

The Chapter on Arthāpatti, Tattvacintāmaṇi by Gaṅgeśa.

SV :

The Chapter on Arthāpatti, Ślokavārttika by Kumārilabhaṭṭa.

References

  • Avasthi, B., & Avasthi, I. (1977). Abhidhāvṛttamātṛkā. Delhi: Indu Prakashan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaṭṭācārya, S. (2000). Khaṇḍanakhaṇḍakhādyam of Śrī Harṣa (Pramātva-khaṇḍanam). Kolkata: Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, N. (2011). Lakṣaṇā as inference. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 39(4–5), 353–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. N. (1952). A history of Indian philosophy (Vol. III). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvivedi, R. (1973). Abhidhāvṛttimātṛkā of Mukulabhaṭṭa. Vidyābhavan Samskṛta Granthamālā 165. Varanasi.

  • Granoff, P. (1978). Philosophy and argument in Late Vedānta: Śrī Harṣa’s Khaṇḍanakhaṇḍakhādya. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guha, N. (2008). Arthāpatti: A critical examination. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, XXV(4), 107–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, N. (2012a). Tarka as cognitive validator. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 40(1), 44–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha, N. (2012b). Lakṣaṇā as a creative function of language. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 40(5), 489–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S. Y. (2010). An inquiry into the definition of tarka in Nyāya tradition and its connotation of negative speculation. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 38(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapitan, T. (1992). Peirce and the autonomy of abductive reasoning. Erkenntnis, 37, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasturirangan, R., Guha, N., & Chakravarthi, R. (2011). Indian cognitivism and the phenomenology of conceptualization. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (2013). Mukulabhaṭṭa’s defense of Lakṣaṇā: How we use words to mean something else, but not everything else. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 41(4), 439–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matilal, B. K. (1986). Perception: An essay on classical Indian theories of knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matilal, B. K. (1998). In J. Ganeri & H. Tiwari (Eds.), The character of logic in India. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narasimha, R. (2007). Epistemology and language in Indian astronomy and mathematics. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 35, 521–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarma, K. V. (Ed.). (1976). Siddhāntadarpaṇam of Nīlakaṇṭhasomayājī with auto-commentary. Hoshiarpur: Panjab University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastri, A. C. (1929). Bṛhatī of Prabhakara Misra with the Ṛjuvimala of Mahamahopadhyaya Salikanatha Misra. Banaras: The Secretary, Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastri, S. K. R. (1971). Ślokavārtika of Kumārila with Tātparya-ṭīkā of Uṃveka Bhaṭṭa. Madras: University of Madras.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suali, L. (1905). Ṣaḍdarśanasamuccaya of Haribhadra with commentary Tarkarahasyadīpikā. Calcutta: Asiatic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Śāstrī, A., & Pansikar, V. L. S. (Eds.). (1982). Brahmasūtra Śāṅkara Bhāṣya with the commentaries Bhāmatī, Kalpataru and Parimala. Varanasi: Krishnadas Acaemy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Śāstrī, T. (2007). Siddhāntabindu of Madhusūdana Sarasvatī. Banaras: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Śāstrī, T. G. (1917). The Śābdanirṇaya by Prakāśātmayatīndra. Trivandrum Sanskrit Series 53. Trivandrum.

  • Sharma, B. N. K. (1962). The philosophy of Sri Madhvacharya. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tailanga, G. S. (1896). The Nyāyasūtras with Vātsyāyana’s Bhāṣya. Benares: E. J. Lazarus & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarkavagish, K. (1990). Tattvacintāmaṇi of Gaṅgeśa (Vol. II, Part 1). Chaukhamba: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Pratishthan.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nirmalya Guha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guha, N. On Arthāpatti . J Indian Philos 44, 757–776 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-015-9280-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-015-9280-9

Keywords

Navigation