Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modern Class Society in the Making: Evidence from Palatinate Gravestones of the Nineteenth Century

  • Published:
International Journal of Historical Archaeology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study of nineteenth century gravestones of the Palatinate confirms sociocultural transformations, along the dimensions of social identity and ideological convictions, from rank society to a capitalist class society. Moreover, the sampled gravestones reveal the family as a decisive unit of social identity, with a simultaneous withdrawal into the private sphere. These findings contradict the usual historic narrative of that period and region and suggest a politically withdrawn, passive and disillusioned society that offered little, if any, opposition to an authoritarian state, as long as economic opportunities provided a chance for social ascent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ariés, P. (1976). Western attitudes toward death: from the middle ages to the present, Marion Boyars, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bark, J. (2001). Biedermeier und Vormärz - Bürgerlicher Realismus. Geschichte der Deutschen Literatur. Band 3, Klett-Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkai, A. (1985). German-Jewish migrations in the nineteenth century, 1830–1910. Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook 30(1): 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, S., and Silverman, M. G. (1979). Ideology and everyday life, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashford, L., and Sibun, L. (2007). Excavations at the Quaker burial ground, Kingston-upon-Thames, London. Post-Medieval Archaeology 41(1): 100–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baugher, S., and Winter, F. (1983). Early american gravestones: archaeological perspectives on three cemeteries of old New York. Archaeology 36(5): 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard, M. (1983). Das Biedermeier: Kultur zwischen Wiener Kongreß und Märzrevolution, Econ-Verlag, Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • BHU (2007). Historische Friedhöfe in Deutschland, Moser Druck und Verlag GmbH, Rheinbach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1971). Mortuary practices: their study and potential. In Brown, J. (ed.), Approaches to the Social Dimensions of Mortuary Practices, Society for American Archaeology, Memoir 25, pp. 6–29.

  • Blackbourn, D., and Eley, G. (1980). Mythen deutscher Geschichtsschreibung. Die gescheiterte bürgerliche Revolution von 1848, Ullstein, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. (1971). Introduction. In Brown, J. (ed.), Approaches to the Social Dimensions of Mortuary Practices, Society for American Archaeology, Memoir 25, pp. 1–5.

  • Burke, H. (2006). Ideology and the material culture of death. In Hall, M., and Silliman, S. W. (eds.), Historical archaeology, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 128–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, A., et al. (1989). The historical dimension in mortuary expressions of status and sentiment. Current Anthropology 30(4): 437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cipolla, C. N. (2011). Commemoration, community, and colonial politics at Brothertown. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 36(2): 145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. (1987). Gravestones: Reflectors of ethnicity or class? In Spencer-Wood, S. M. (ed.), Consumer choice in historical archaeology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 383–395.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, C. D. A. (2003). Tradition, modernity, and postmodernity in symbolism of death. The Sociological Quarterly 44(4): 727–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, E. A. (1981). Philadelphia gravestones 1760–1820. Northeast Historical Archaeology 10(1): 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, E. A., and Mackie, N. V. (1990). The funerary monuments and burial patterns of colonial Tidewater Virginia, 1607–1776. Markers 7: 103–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, J. F. (1977). In small things forgotten: an archaeology of early american life, Anchor Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, J. (1996). In small things forgotten. An archaeology of early american life, 2nd ed, Anchor Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, J., and Dethlefsen, E. (1967). Death's head, cherub, urn and willow. Natural History 76(3): 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethlefsen, E. S., and Deetz, J. (1966). Death’s heads, cherubs, and willow trees: experimental archaeology in colonial cemeteries. American Antiquity 31(4): 502–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, M., Preuß, G., and Rothenberger, K. (1981). Pfälzische Landeskunde. Beiträge zu Geographie, Biologie, Volkskunde und Geschichte. 3 Bände, Historisches Seminar der Universität Landau, Landau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, F. J. I., and DiBlasi, M. (1981). Gravestone iconography and mortuary ideology. Ethnohistory 28(1): 70–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günther-Arndt, H., and Kocka, J. (1991). Geschichtsbuch. Die Menschen und ihre Geschichte in Darstellungen und Dokumenten, Cornelsen Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilakis, Y. (2012). “…Not being at home is one’s home”: ontology, temporality, critique. Forum Kritische Archäologie 1: 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, A. R. (2014). Cherubs or putti? Gravemarkers demonstrating conspicuous consumption and the rococo fashion in the 18th century. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 18: 37–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersche, P. (1973). Napoleonische Friedensverträge. Campo Formio 1797 - Lunéville 1801, Amiens 1802 - Pressburg 1805, Tilsit 1807 - Wien-Schönbrunn 1809. 2. neubearbeitete Auflage. H. Lang, Bern.

  • Hobsbawm, E. J. (1962). The age of revolution, 1789–1848, New American Library, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. J. (1975). The age of capital. 1848–1875, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. J. (1987). The age of empire. 1875–1914, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1982). Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view. In Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–16.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1995). Always momentary, fluid, and flexible: towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity 71(273): 691–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, J. W. (2009). Editor’s preface. Historical Archaeology 43(1): V–VI.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, H. A. (1985). Irish wayside and churchyard crosses, 1600–1700. Post-Medieval Archaeology 19: 13–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocka, J. (2002). Handbuch der Deutschen Geschichte in 24 Bänden. Bd. 13. Das Lange 19. Jahrhundert. Arbeit, Nation und Bürgerliche Gesellschaft. 10. Aufl. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart.

  • Kohnle, A. (2011). Kleine Geschichte der Kurpfalz, G. Braun Verlag, Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreutz, W. (2007). Hambach 1832. Deutsches Freiheitsfest und Vorbote des europäischen Völkerfrühlings, Landeszentrale für Politische Bildung, Mainz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, R. (1979). Biedermeier. Eine Lebenshaltung zwischen 1815 und 1848, Verlag Koehler & Amelang, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. P. (1995). A historical archaeology of capitalism. American Anthropologist 97(2): 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. P. (1996). Interpreting ideology in historical archaeology: Using the rules of perspective in the William Paca Garden in Annapolis, Maryland. In Orser, C. (ed.), Images of the recent past, Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, pp. 371–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. P., and Potter, P. B. (1999). Historical archaeologies of capitalism, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. P., Potter, P. B., and Shackle, P. A. (1987). Toward a critical archaeology. Current Anthropology 28(3): 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G. (1971). Reification and the consciousness of the proletariat. In Livingstone, R. (ed.), History and class consciousness, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 83–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallios, S., and Caterino, D. M. (2007). Transformations in San Diego County gravestones and cemeteries. Historical Archaeology 41(4): 50–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallios, S., and Caterino, D. M. (2011). Mortality, money, and commemoration: Social and economic factors in Southern California grave-marker change during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 15: 429–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R. H. (2003). Dialogues with the dead: ideology and the cemetery. In Leone, M. P., and Potter, P. B. (eds.), The recovery of meaning: historical archaeology in the eastern united states, Percheron Press, New York, pp. 435–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerhoff, B. (1984). Rites and signs of ripening: the intertwining of ritual, time and growing older. In Ketzel, D., and Keith, J. (eds.), Age and anthropological theory, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp. 305–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mytum, H. (2004). Local traditions in early eighteenth-century commemoration: The headstone memorials from Balrothery, Co. Dublin, and their place in the evolution of Irish and British commemorative practice. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. Section C: Archaeology, Celtic Studies, History, Linguistics, Literature 104C(1): 1–35.

  • Mytum, H. (2006). Popular attitudes to memory, the body, and social identity: the rise of external commemoration in Britain, Ireland and New England. Post-Medieval Archaeology 40(1): 96–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mytum, H. (2009). Mortality symbols in action: protestant and catholic memorials in early- eighteenth-century West Ulster. Historical Archaeology 43(1): 160–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nipperdey, T. (2013). Deutsche Geschichte 1800–1866. Bürgerwelt und starker Staat. C.H. Beck, München.

  • Osterhammel, J. (2007). Auf der Suche nach einem 19. Jahrhundert. In Conrad, S. (ed.), Globalgeschichte: Theorien, Ansätze, Themen, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterhammel, J. (2009). Die Verwandlung der Welt: Eine Geschichte des 19, Jahrhunderts. C.H. Beck, München.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parker Pearson, M. (1999). The archaeology of death and burial, Sutton Publishing, Phoenix Mill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker-Pearson, M. (1982). Mortuary practices, society and ideology: an ethnoarchaeological study. In Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 99–113.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reimers, E. (1999). Death and identity: graves and funerals as cultural communication. Mortality 4(2): 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugg, J. (2000). Defining the place of burial: what makes a cemetery a cemetery? Mortality 5(3): 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seale, C. (1998). Constructing death, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • SG (2014). www.scottishgraveyards.org.uk. http://www.scottishgraveyards.org.uk/resources11.shtml, accessed Sept. 30th, 2014.

  • Stone, G. (1991). Material evidence of ideological and ethnic choice in Long Island gravestones, 1670–1800. Material Culture 23(3): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strangstad, L. (2013). A graveyard preservation primer, 2nd ed, AltaMira Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarlow, S. (1997). An archaeology of remembering: death, bereavement and the first world war. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 7(1): 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarlow, S. (1999). Bereavement and commemoration: an archaeology of mortality, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarlow, S. (2000). Landscapes of memory: the nineteenth-century garden cemetery. European Journal of Archaeology 3(2): 217–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarlow, S. (2005). Death and commemoration. Industrial Archeology Review 27(1): 163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarlow, S. (2012). The archaeology of emotion and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, G. (1994). Historical social science: methodologies, methods, and meanings. In Denzin, N. (ed.), Handbook of qualitative sociology, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 306–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gennep, A. (1960). The rites of passage, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veit, R. F. (1999). John Solomon Teetzel and the Anglo-German gravestone carving tradition of the eighteenth-century Northwestern New Jersey. Markers 17: 124–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veit, R. F. (2009). Resolved to strike out a new path: Consumerism and iconographic change in New Jersey gravestones, 1680–1820. Historical Archaeology 43(1): 115–141.

  • Veit, R. F., and Nonestied, M. (2008). New Jersey cemeteries and tombstones history in the landscape, Rivergate Books, New Brunswick, pp. 112–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veit, R. F., Baugher, S. B., and Scharfenberger, G. P. (2009). Historical archaeology of religious sites and cemeteries. Historical Archaeology 43(1): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehler, H. U. (1987). Deutsche Gesellschaftsgeschichte. Bd. 2: Von der Reformära bis zur Industriellen und Politischen ‘Deutschen Doppelrevolution’ 1815–1845/49, C.H. Beck, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehler, H. U. (1995). Deutsche Gesellschaftsgeschichte. Bd. 3: Von der „Deutschen Doppelrevolution“ bis zum Beginn des Ersten Weltkrieges 1845/49–1914, C.H. Beck, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidmann, W. (1986). Die wirtschaftlich-sozialen Hintergründe der Pfälzer Revolution von 1849 und die sozialrevolutionären Umsturzversuche. In Bezirksgruppe Kaiserslautern des Historischen Vereins der Pfalz (ed.), Jahrbuch zur Geschichte von Stadt und Landkreis Kaiserslautern, Verlag Franz Arbogast, Otterbach, pp. 19–58.

  • Wilkie, A., and Bartoy, K. M. (2000). A critical archaeology revisited. Current Anthropology 41(5): 747–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

For their supervision, advice, and constant support during this research, I would like to thank Prof. Sarah Tarlow from University of Leicester as well as Dr. Craig Cipolla from the Royal Ontario Museum. I also would like to thank Charles E. Orser, Jr. and the anonymous reviewers for their recommendations for improving this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculté des Lettres, des Sciences Humaines, des Arts et des Sciences de l’Education, Université du Luxembourg, 2, Avenue de l’Université, L-4365, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

    Christoph K. Streb

Authors
  1. Christoph K. Streb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph K. Streb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Streb, C.K. Modern Class Society in the Making: Evidence from Palatinate Gravestones of the Nineteenth Century. Int J Histor Archaeol 21, 240–276 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-016-0347-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-016-0347-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation