Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Educating Students in Real-world Sustainability Research: Vision and Implementation

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Readers are invited to imagine students helping to solve real-world sustainability problems brought to them by societal stakeholders and simultaneously learning about and contributing to sustainable changes in society. Effective sustainability research education engages students in just that. Higher education institutions are implementing this vision of education in entire curricula, individual courses, and extracurricular research activities. In this article, we build on the literature to describe a vision of sustainability research education and present an evaluative scheme for measuring its effectiveness. We apply the scheme to two sustainability research-education projects in Switzerland to test its applicability and to identify achievements of the projects and the areas where improvement is needed. Areas for improvement include collaboration between academics and practitioners, joint problem definition, and the guidance of students to participate successfully in collaborative, real-world projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For details about these efforts, please see: http://www.ulsf.org/resources_sust_degrees.htm, http://sustainabilityscience.org/curriculum.html, http://schoolofsustainability.asu.edu/degrees/index.php, http://www.sustainability.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/, http://www.lucsus.lu.se/html/education_at_lucsus.aspx, http://www.icis.unimaas.info/education/must/, http://www.sustain.ubc.ca/.

  2. A peer review process is common practice in academia to ensure credibility of an academic contribution. The “extended peer-review” refers to the same process, but it includes non-academic experts such as stakeholders and decision-makers in the review process to ensure credibility, legitimacy, and salience of the academic and practical contribution.

  3. Ingredient branding is a marketing concept. It means that an ingredient or component is added into an existing product (e.g., GoreTex in outdoor clothing; NutraSweet in diet soft drinks). The ingredient brand has its own brand identity to promote its special features. The inclusion of an ingredient in an existing product improves the existing product. The question then is how to market the improved product. In general, companies strive to relate the ingredient brand to the brand of the initial product to market the improved version. In doing so they hope to tap into customers’ brand awareness of the initial product and of the ingredient.

  4. For details, see http://www.are.admin.ch/dokumentation/publikationen/00014/index.html?lang=en

References

  • Alvarez, A., & Rogers, J. (2006). Going “out there”: Learning about sustainability in place. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(2), 176–188. doi:10.1108/14676370610655940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arizona State University School of Sustainability (n.d.). Challenge the world: Degrees of study. Retrieved August 3, 2010 from: http://schoolofsustainability.asu.edu/degrees/index.php

  • Brundiers, K., Wiek, A., & Redman, C. (in press). Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability – From classroom into the real-world. International Journal for Sustainability in Higher Education.

  • Calder, W., & Clugston, R. (2003). International efforts to promote higher education for sustainable development. Planning for Higher Education, 31(3), 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, W., & Clugston, R. (2005). Education for a sustainable future. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(1), 7–12. doi:10.1080/03098260500030231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, P. B., & Wals, A. E. J. (2004). Higher education and the challenge of sustainability: Problematics, promise and practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cortese, A. D. (2003). The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Planning for Higher Education, 31(3), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, J. L. (2008). Think systemically, act cooperatively. Reaching the tipping point for the sustainability movement in higher education. Sustainability, The Journal of Record, 1(5), 319–328. doi:10.1089/SUS.2008.9930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Office of Spatial Development [Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung, ARE] (2008). Sustainable Development Strategy: Guidelines and Action Plan 2008–2011. Bern, Switzerland: Federal Office for Spatial Development (ARE) Sustainable Development. Retrieved June 5, 2010, from: http://www.are.admin.ch/dokumentation/publikationen/00014/index.html?lang=en

  • Fien, J. (2002). Advancing sustainability in higher education: Issues and opportunities for research. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3(2), 243–253. doi:10.1108/14676370210434705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, T., & Grundwald, A. (2008). Making nanotechnology developments sustainable. A role for technology assessment? Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(8–9), 889–898. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.04.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755. doi:10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, A. (2004). Strategic knowledge for sustainable development: The need for reflexivity and learning at the interface between science and society. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1–2), 150–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 183–201. doi:10.1080/03098260500130387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch Hardon, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2006). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainable research. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 119–128. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, M., Elverum, D., Nesbit, S., Robinson, J., Yen, D., & Moore, J. (2008). Learning teaching in the sustainability classroom. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 521–533. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., et al. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641–642. doi:10.1126/science.1059386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kueffer, C. (2006). Integrative ecological research: Case-specific validation of ecological knowledge for environmental problem solving. GAIA—Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 15(2), 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., et al. (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317(5844), 1513–1516. doi:10.1126/science.1144004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (2005). Sustainability, systems thinking and professional practice. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 18(2), 163–171. doi:10.1007/s11213-005-4156-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNall, M., Sturdevant, R. C., Brown, R., & Allen, A. (2009). Brokering community-university engagement. Innovative Higher Education, 33(5), 317–331. doi:10.1007/s10755-007-9052-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (Ed.). (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. (2001). Hybrid management: Boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 26(4), 478–450. doi:10.1177/016224390102600405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, P., & Zander, U. (2006). Managing the interface—from knowledge to action in global change and sustainability sciences. Munich, Germany: Oekom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhar, A., Vilsmaier, U., Glanzer, M., & Freyer, B. (2006). Initiating transdisciplinarity in academic case study teaching: Experiences from a regional development project in Salzburg, Austria. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(3), 293–308. doi:10.1108/146763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mushakoji, K. (1978). Peace research as internal learning process: A new meta paradigm. International Studies Quarterly, 22(2), 173–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy, education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammalisto, K., & Lindhqvist, T. (2008). Integration of sustainability in higher education: A study with international perspectives. Innovative Higher Education, 32(4), 221–233. doi:10.1007/s10755-007-9052-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G., & Posch, A. (2006). Higher education for sustainability by means of transdisciplinary case studies: An innovative approach for solving complex, real-world problems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11), 877–890. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2008). Being undisciplined—Transgressions and intersections in academia and beyond. Futures, 40(1), 70–86. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2007.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. (2007). Education for a sustainable future. Science, 317(5836), 323–324. doi:10.1126/science.1143552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, R. W., Lang, D., Wiek, A., Walter, A., & Stauffacher, M. (2006). Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning: Historical framework and theory. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(3), 226–251. doi:10.1108/14676370610677829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffacher, M., Walter, A., Lang, D., Wiek, A., & Scholz, R. W. (2006). Learning to research environmental problems from a functional socio-cultural constructivism perspective: The transdisciplinary case study approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(3), 252–275. doi:10.1108/14676370610677838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S. (2004). Higher education, sustainability, and the role of systemic learning. In B. P. Corcoran & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), Higher education and the challenge of sustainability: Problematics, promise and practice (pp. 49–70). Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/0-306-48515-X_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO, 2003. United Nations decade of education for sustainable development (January 2005–December 2014): Framework for a draft international implementation scheme. Paris, France: UNESCO. Retrieved June 5, 2010, from http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID=23365&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

  • University of British Columbia (n.d.). The SEEDS Program (Social, Ecological, Economic, Development Studies). Retrieved June 17, 2010, from UBC web site: http://www.sustain.ubc.ca/campus-sustainability/getting-involved/seeds

  • University Leaders for a Sustainable Future (n.d.). Retrieved June 5, 2010, from ULSF.org web site: http://www.ulsf.org/resources_sust_degrees.htm

  • University of Tokyo (n.d.). Graduate Program in Sustainability Science. Retrieved June 17, 2010 from U-Tokyo web site: http://www.sustainability.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp

  • van de Kerkhof, M., & Wieczorek, A. (2005). Learning and stakeholder participation in transition processes towards sustainability: Methodological considerations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(6), 733–747. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kerkhoff, L., & Lebel, L. (2006). Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 445–477. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.31.102405.170850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. E. J., & Jickling, B. (2002). “Sustainability” in higher education: From doublethink and newspeak to critical thinking and meaningful learning. Higher Education Policy, 15(2), 121–131. doi:10.1016/S0952-8733(02)00003-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western Michigan University (n.d.). Environmental Studies Program. Retrieved June 5, 2010, from WMU web site: http://www.wmich.edu/environmental-studies/index.htm

  • Wiek, A. (2007). Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation—Experiences from transdisciplinary case study research. GAIA—Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 16(1), 52–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiek, A., Scheringer, M., Pohl, C., Hirsch Hadorn, G., & Valsangiacomo, A. (2007). Joint problem identification and structuring in environmental research. GAIA—Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 16(1), 72–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiek, A., Brundiers, K., Kueffer, C., & Wülser, G. (2010a). Building real-world sustainability competence in higher education. Working Paper. Tempe, AZ: School of Sustainability, Arizona State University.

  • Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2010b). Key competencies in sustainability—A reference framework for academic program development. Working Paper. Tempe: AZ: School of Sustainability, Arizona State University.

  • Wiesmann, U., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., et al. (2008). Enhancing transdisciplinary research: A synthesis in fifteen propositions. In G. Hirsch Hadorn (Ed.), Handbook of transdisciplinary research (pp. 433–441). Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6699-3_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank three anonymous reviewers and Marcia Nation and Kathryn Kyle (Arizona State University) for helpful comments on previous versions of this article. We would like to thank the advisory board of Seed Sustainability, namely Gabriela Wülser, Christoph Kueffer, Thomas Camerata, Renat Heuberger, and Roger Baud, for their long-standing fruitful collaboration with us. Arnim Wiek acknowledges the support of the Swiss NSF grant PA0011-115315.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja Brundiers.

Additional information

Katja Brundiers

is the Community-University Liaison for the Decision Center for a Desert City and the School of Sustainability at Arizona State University. She received her M.Sc. in Geography from the University of Zürich, Switzerland. Her research interest focuses on the collaboration between scholars and practitioners in the areas of sustainable urban development, decision making under uncertainty, and social processes of integration and segregation.

Arnim Wiek

is an Assistant Professor in the School of Sustainability at Arizona State University. He received his Ph.D. in Environmental Sciences from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich and his M.A. in Philosophy from the Free University Berlin, Germany. His research interests include sustainability governance, planning and decision-making related to urban and regional development, land use conflicts, depletion of natural resources, emerging technologies, and climate change.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brundiers, K., Wiek, A. Educating Students in Real-world Sustainability Research: Vision and Implementation. Innov High Educ 36, 107–124 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-010-9161-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-010-9161-9

Key words

Navigation