Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Towards a risk-based typology for transnational education

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transnational education (TNE) has been a growth area for UK universities over the last decade. The standard typology classifies TNE by the nature of the activity (i.e., distance learning, international branch campus, franchise, and validation). By analysing a large number of TNE partnerships around the world, this study reveals that the current typology has declining value because partnerships are becoming multidimensional and blurring the boundaries between one type and another. It draws on partnership theory and transaction cost analysis to develop a new risk-based typology, using six dimensions of a TNE partnership. The new typology provides a risk profile for a TNE partnership which identifies the sources of reputational risk to the home university.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altbach, P., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motives and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 290–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beerkens, E. (2002). International inter-organisational arrangements in higher education: Towards a typology. Tertiary Education and Management, 8(4), 297–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennell, P., & Pearce, T. (2003). The internationalisation of higher education: Exporting education to developing and transitional economies. International Journal of Educational Development, 23(2), 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M. (2007). North-South research partnerships: Challenges, responses and trends—A literature review and annotated bibliography. Working Paper 1, IDRC Canadian Partnerships Working Paper Series. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre. http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/36539/1/127716.pdf. Accessed December 13, 2014.

  • Burgess, P., & Berquist, B. (2012). Cross-border delivery: Programs, programs, and providers. In D. K. Deardorff, J. Heyl, & T. Adams (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of international higher education (pp. 325–342). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Castle, R., & Kelly, D. (2004). International education: Quality assurance and standards in offshore teaching: Exemplars and problems. Quality in Higher Education, 10(1), 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C-BERT. (n.d.) Branch campus listing (Updated March 17, 2014). http://www.globalhighered.org/branchcampuses.php. Accessed March 28, 2014.

  • Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x/pdf. Accessed April 4, 2013.

  • Craft, A. (2004). The assessment of quality risks in collaborative provision. Quality in Higher Education, 10(1), 25–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wit, H. (2002). Internationalization of higher education in the United States of America and Europe: A historical, comparative, and conceptual analysis. London: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, S., McCaig, C., Marsden, D., Haughton, P., McBride, J., McBride, D., et al. (2008). Trans-national education and higher education institutions: Exploring patterns of HE institutional activity. London: Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, S., Tang, N., Poole, G., & Willis, B. (2006). Trans-national education—UK higher education institutions’ response to increasing global demand: Summary report. Manchester: British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., Crosling, G., & Edwards, R. (2010). Outsourcing university degrees: Implications for quality control. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(3), 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, F., & Smith, A. (2000). The partnership handbook. Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Canada. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/MP43-373-1-2000E.pdf. Accessed March 5, 2013.

  • Garrett, R. (2002). International branch campuses: Scale and significance. Redhill: Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. http://www.obhe.ac.uk/documents/view_details?id=574. Accessed September 20, 2012.

  • Garrett, G., & Verbik, L. (2004). Transnational delivery by UK higher education, part 1: Data and missing data. Redhill: Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. http://www.obhe.ac.uk/documents/view_details?id=63. Accessed June 6, 2012.

  • Global Alliance for Transnational Education. (1997). Certification manual. Cited in: Adams, T., 1998. The operation of transnational degree and diploma programs: The Australian case. Journal of Studies in International Education, 2(1), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, T. (2012). Higher education across borders: Models of engagement and lessons from corporate strategy. Redhill: Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. www.obhe.ac.uk/documents/download?id=895. Accessed August 20, 2012.

  • HEIDI. (n.d.) Higher education information database for institutions. https://heidi.hesa.ac.uk/home.aspx. Accessed March 28, 2014.

  • Henry, J. (2011). University of Wales abolished after visa scandal. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/8843200/University-of-Wales-abolished-after-visa-scandal.html. Accessed January 17, 2014.

  • HESA. (n.d.) Free online statistics—Students & qualifiers. http://www.hesa.ac.uk/content/view/1897/239/. Accessed March 28, 2014.

  • House of Commons. (2005). Education and skills committee: UK e-University (third report of session 2004–05). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmeduski/205/205.pdf. Accessed December 20, 2013.

  • Inkpen, A., & Beamish, P. (1997). Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinser, K., & Green, M. (2009). The power of partnerships: A transatlantic dialogue. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. http://www.eua.be/publications/reference-publications.aspx. Accessed December 15, 2013.

  • Knight, J. (2007). Cross-border tertiary education: An introduction. In Vincent-Lancrin, S. (Ed.) Cross-border tertiary education: A way towards capacity development. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and The World Bank, 21–46.

  • Knight, J. (2011). Education hubs: A fad, a brand, an innovation? Journal of Studies in International Education, 15(3), 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J., & Kinser, K. (2012). International branch campuses: One definition to rule them all? http://chronicle.com/blogs/worldwise/international-branch-campuses-one-definition-to-rule-them-all/29051. Accessed February 6, 2013.

  • Larsen, K., Momii, K., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2004). Cross-border higher education: An analysis of current trends, policy strategies and future scenarios. Redhill: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. http://www.obhe.ac.uk/documents/view_details?id=49. Accessed October 19, 2012.

  • Lawton, W., & Katsomitros, A. (2012). International branch campuses: Data and developments. Redhill: Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. www.obhe.ac.uk/documents/download?id=894. Accessed August 22, 2012.

  • Long, F., & Arnold, M. (1995). The power of environmental partnerships. London: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maselli D., Lys, J.-A., & Schmid, J. (2006). Improving impacts of research partnerships. Swiss Commission for Research Partnerships with Developing Countries. Berne: KFPE GEOGRAPHICA BERNENSIA. www.kfpe.ch/download/KFPE_ImpactStudy-final.pdf. Accessed December 13, 2013.

  • Margerum, R. (2008). A typology of collaboration efforts in environmental management. Environmental Management, 41(4), 487–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBurnie, G., & Ziguras, C. (2009). Trends and future scenarios in programme and institution mobility across borders. In Higher education to 2030 volume 2: Globalization. Paris: OECD, 89–108.

  • McQuaid, R. (2000). The theory of partnerships: Why have partnerships? In S. Osborne (Ed.), Public-private partnerships: Theory and practice in international practice (pp. 9–35). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R., Woodfield, S., Forland, H., & Fielden, J. (2009). Universities and international higher education partnerships: Making a difference. London: Million+. http://www.millionplus.ac.uk/research/index. Accessed August 24, 2012.

  • Moore, E., & Koontz, T. (2003). Research note—A typology of collaborative watershed groups: Citizen-based, agency-based, and mixed partnerships. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 16(5), 451–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthusamy, S., & White, M. (2006). Does power sharing matter? The role of power and influence in alliance performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(7), 811–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, V. (2009). Transnational higher education: A stock take of current activity. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13, 310–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1992). Managing higher education international cooperation: Strategies and solutions. UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0009/000986/098679eb.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2013.

  • Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. (2007). A miscalculated level of risk? UNSW Asia announces its unexpected closure. http://www.obhe.ac.uk/documents/view_details?id=192. Accessed June 16, 2012.

  • Olsson, B. (2008). Symmetry and asymmetry in research partnerships: Lessons from 20 years’ experience. NORRAG News 41, December, 78–80. http://www.norrag.org/en/publications/norrag-news/online-version/the-new-politics-of-partnership-peril-or-promise/detail/symmetry-and-asymmetry-in-research-partnerships-lessons-from-20-years-experience.html. Accessed December 14, 2013.

  • Open University. (n.d.) Facts and figures. http://www.open.ac.uk/about/main/the-ou-explained/facts-and-figures. Accessed January 17, 2014.

  • Selin, S. (1999). Developing a typology of sustainable tourism partnerships. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 7(3&4), 260–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., & Wohlstetter, P. (2006). Understanding the different faces of partnering: A typology of public–private partnerships. School Leadership and Management, 26(3), 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stella, A. (2006). Quality assurance of cross-border higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 12(3), 257–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Nottingham. (2010). Strategic plan 2010–15. http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/about/documents/universityofnottinghamstrategicplan2010-15.pdf. Accessed December 20, 2012.

  • Verbik, L., & Merkley, C. (2006). The international branch campus—Models and trends. Redhill: Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. http://www.obhe.ac.uk/documents/view_details?id=34. Accessed November 20, 2012.

  • Waddock, S. A. (1991). A typology of social partnership organizations. Administration and Society, 22(4), 480–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waechter, B. (2000). Handbook on European associations in higher education: A practical guide to academic networks in Europe and beyond. Brussels: Academic Cooperation Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, S., & Huisman, J. (2012). The international branch campus as transnational strategy in higher education. Higher Education, 64(5), 627–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. London: Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M. (1993). Quality assurance for higher education franchising. Higher Education, 26(2), 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziguras, C., & McBurnie, C. (2008). The impact of trade liberalization on transnational education. In M. Wallace & L. Dunn (Eds.), Teaching in transnational higher education: Enhancing learning for offshore international students. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Business, Law and Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Burton Street, Nottingham, NG1 4BU, UK

    Nigel Martin Healey

Authors
  1. Nigel Martin Healey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nigel Martin Healey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Healey, N.M. Towards a risk-based typology for transnational education. High Educ 69, 1–18 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9757-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9757-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation