November 2014, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 437-464,
Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Date: 07 Aug 2014
How Similar are Cohabiting and Married Parents? Second Conception Risks by Union Type in the United States and Across Europe
- Brienna Perelli-Harris
- … show all 1 hide
The increase in births within cohabitation in the United States and across Europe suggests that cohabitation and marriage have become more similar with respect to childbearing. However, little is known about additional childbearing after first birth. Using harmonized union and fertility histories from surveys in 15 countries, this study examines second conception risks leading to a live birth for women who have given birth within a union. Results show that women who continue to cohabit after birth have significantly lower second conception risks than married women in all countries except those in Eastern Europe, even when controlling for union duration, union dissolution, age at first birth, and education. Pooled models indicate that differences in the second conception risks by union type between Eastern and Western Europe are significant. Pooled models including an indicator for the diffusion of cohabitation show that when first births within cohabitation are rare, cohabiting women have significantly lower second conception risks than married women. As first births within cohabitation increase, differences in second conception risks for cohabiting and married women narrow. But as the percent increases further, the differentials increase again, suggesting that cohabitation and marriage are not becoming equivalent settings for additional childbearing. However, I also find that in all countries except Estonia, women who marry after first birth have second conception risks similar to couples married at first birth, indicating that the sequence of marriage and childbearing does not matter to fertility as much as the act of marrying itself.
Baizán, P., Aassve, A., & Billari, F. C. (2003). Cohabitation, marriage, and first birth: The interrelationship of family formation events in Spain. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 19(2), 147–169.CrossRef
Baizán, P., Aassve, A., & Billari, F. C. (2004). The interrelations between cohabitation, marriage and first birth in Germany and Sweden. Population and Environment, 25(6), 531–561.CrossRef
Bartus, T., Murinkó, L., Szalma, I., & Szél, B. (2013). The effect of education on second births in Hungary: A test of the time-squeeze, self-selection, and partner-effect hypotheses. Demographic Research, 28(1), 1–32.CrossRef
Beaujouan, E., & Ni Bhrolchain, M. (2011). Cohabitation and marriage in Britain since the 1970s. Population Trends, 145(1), 35–59.CrossRef
Begall, K., & Mills, M. C. (2012). The influence of educational field, occupation, and occupational sex segregation on fertility in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 26(3), 351–366.
Billari, F. C., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2010). Towards a new pattern of transition to adulthood? Advances in Life Course Research, 15(2–3), 59–75.CrossRef
Billingsley, S. (2011). Economic crisis and recovery: Changes in second birth rates within occupational classes and educational groups. Demographic Research, 24(16), 375–406.CrossRef
Brown, S. L. (2000). The effect of union type on psychological well-being: depression among cohabitors versus marrieds. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41(3), 241–255.CrossRef
Brown, S. L. (2003). Relationship quality dynamics of cohabiting unions. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 583–601.CrossRef
Carlson, M., McLanahan, S., & England, P. (2004). Union formation in fragile families. Demography, 41(2), 237–261.CrossRef
Castro-Martín, T., Domínguez-Folgueras, M., & Martín-García, T. (2008). Not truly partnerless: Non-residential partnerships and retreat from marriage in Spain. Demographic Research, 18(16), 443–468.CrossRef
Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.CrossRef
Cherlin, A. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Knopf.
Coale, A. J. (1992). Age of entry into marriage and the date of the initiation of voluntary birth control. Demography, 29(3), 333–341.CrossRef
Corijn, M. (2005). Huwen, uit de echt scheiden en hertrouwen in België en in het Vlaamse Gewest. Een analyse op basis van Rijksregistergegevens CBGS-Werkdocument 2005, 5:98.
Corijn, M. (2011). Zijn jongeren in Vlaanderen van plan om te huwen (en te scheiden)? SVR-Webartikel, (15).
De Wachter, D. (forthcoming). Postponement or renouncement? A longitudinal analysis of new patterns of family formation using the 1991 and 2001 census. Ph.D. Dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Brussel—Universiteit Antwerpen.
DeMaris, A. (2001). The influence of intimate violence on transitions out of cohabitation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(1), 235–246.CrossRef
Di Giulio, P., & Rosina, A. (2007). Intergenerational family ties and the diffusion of cohabitation in Italy. Demographic Research, 16(14), 441–468.CrossRef
Gerster, M., Keiding, N., Knudsen, L. B., & Strandberg-Larsen, K. (2007). Education and second birth rates in Denmark 1981–1994. Demographic Research, 17(17), 181.CrossRef
Heimdal, K. R., & Houseknecht, S. K. (2003). Cohabiting and married couples’ income organization: Approaches in Sweden and the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 525–538.CrossRef
Heuveline, P., & Timberlake, J. M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: the United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66(5), 1214–1230.CrossRef
Heuveline, P., Timberlake, J. M., & Furstenberg, F. F. (2003). Shifting childrearing to single mothers: results from 17 Western countries. Population and Development Review, 29(1), 47–71.CrossRef
Hoem, J. M., Jasilioniene, A., Kostova, D., & Muresan, C. (2009). Traces of the second demographic transition in selected countries in central and Eastern Europe: union formation as a demographic manifestation. European Journal of Population, 25(2), 123–156.CrossRef
Katus, K., Põldma, A., Puur, A., & Sakkeus, L. (2007). First union formation in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania: patterns across countries and gender. Demographic Research, 17(17), 247.CrossRef
Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L. (2008). Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research, 19, 1663–1692.CrossRef
Kenney, C. T., & McLanahan, S. S. (2006). Why are cohabiting relationships more violent than marriages? Demography, 43(1), 127–140.CrossRef
Kiernan, K. (2004). Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood: Here to stay? European perspectives. In D. P. Moynihan, T. M. Smeeding, & L. Rainwater (Eds.), The future of the family. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Klesment, M., & Puur, A. (2010). Effects of education on second births before and after societal transition: Evidence from the Estonian GGS. Demographic Research, 22(28), 891–932.CrossRef
Köppen, K. (2010). Marriage and Cohabitation in western Germany and France. Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät. Rostock: Universität Rostock.
Koytcheva, E., & Philipov, D. (2008). Bulgaria: Ethnic differentials in rapidly declining fertility. Demographic Research, 19(13), 361–402.CrossRef
Kravdal, Ø. (2007). Effects of current education on second-and third-birth rates among Norwegian women and men born in 1964: Substantive interpretations and methodological issues. Demographic Research, 17(17), 211.CrossRef
Kreyenfeld, M. (2002). Time-squeeze, partner effect or selfselection? An investigation into the positive effect of women’s education on second birth risks in West Germany. Demographic Research, 7(2), 15–48.CrossRef
Le Goff, J.-M. (2002). Cohabiting unions in France and West Germany: Transitions to first birth and first marriage. Demographic Research, 7(18), 593–624.CrossRef
Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211–251.CrossRef
Lesthaeghe, R. J., & Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review, 32(4), 669–698.CrossRef
Lichter, D. T., Qian, Z., & Mellott, L. M. (2006). Marriage or dissolution? Union transitions among poor cohabiting women. Demography, 43(2), 223–240.CrossRef
Liefbroer, A. C., & Dourleijn, E. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 european countries. Demography, 43(2), 203–221.CrossRef
Lyngstad, T. H., Noack, T., & Tufte, P. A. (2011). Pooling of economic resources: A comparison of norwegian married and cohabiting couples. European Sociological Review, 27(5), 624–635.CrossRef
Manning, W. D. (1993). Marriage and cohabitation following premarital conception. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 839–850.CrossRef
Manning, W. D. (2004). Children and the stability of cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(3), 674–689.CrossRef
Martin, C., & Théry, I. (2001). The PACS and marriage and cohabitation in France. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 15(1), 135–158.CrossRef
Matysiak, A. (2009). Is Poland really ‘immune’ to the spread of cohabitation. Demographic Research, 21(8), 215–234.CrossRef
Muresan, C., Haragus, P.-T., Haragus, M., & Schröder, C. (2008). Romania: Childbearing metamorphosis within a changing context. Demographic Research, 19(23), 855–906.CrossRef
Musick, K. (2007). Cohabitation, nonmarital childbearing and the marriage process. Demographic Research, 16(9), 249–286.CrossRef
Mynarska, M., & Bernardi, L. (2007). Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland. Demographic Research, 16(17), 519–554.CrossRef
Neels, K. (2006). Reproductive strategies in Belgian fertility: 1930–1990 (p 38). Brussels and The Hague: NIDI-CBGS Publications.
Perelli-Harris, B., & Gerber, T. P. (2011). Nonmarital childbearing in Russia: Second demographic transition or pattern of disadvantage? Demography, 48(1), 317–342.CrossRef
Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., & Kubisch, K. (2009). The Harmonized Histories. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research Working Paper.
Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., Sigle-Rushton, W., Keizer, R., Lappegård, T., Jasilioniene, A., et al. (2012). Changes in union status during the transition to parenthood: An examination of 11 European countries. Population Studies, 66(2), 167–182.CrossRef
Perelli-Harris, B., & Sanchez Gassen, N. (2012). How similar are cohabitation and marriage? Legal approaches to cohabitation across Western Europe. Population and Development Review, 38(3), 435–467.CrossRef
Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Lappegård, T., Keizer, R., Berghammer, C., & Kreyenfeld, M. (2010). The educational gradient of nonmarital childbearing in Europe. Population and Development Review, 36(4), 775–801.CrossRef
Philipov, D., & Jasilioniene, A. (2007). Union formation and fertility in Bulgaria and Russia: A life table description of recent trends. Demographic Research, 19(62), 2057–2114.
Raley, R. K. (2001). Increasing fertility in cohabiting unions: Evidence for the second demographic transition in the United States. Demography, 38(1), 59–66.CrossRef
Reher, D. S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24(2), 203–234.CrossRef
Rose, A. D., Racioppi, F., & Zanatta, A. L. (2008). Italy: Delayed adaptation of social institutions to changes in family behaviour. Demographic Research, 19(19), 665–704.CrossRef
Seltzer, J. A. (2000). Families formed outside of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1247–1268.CrossRef
Sigle-Rushton, W. (2008). England and wales: Stable fertility and pronounced social status differences. Demographic Research, 19(15), 455–502.CrossRef
Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.CrossRef
Sobotka, T. (2004). Is lowest-low fertility in Europe explained by the postponement of childbearing? Population and Development Review, 30(2), 195–220.CrossRef
Soons, J. P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2009). Is marriage more than cohabitation? Well-being differences in 30 European countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1141–1157.CrossRef
Steele, F., Joshi, H., Kallis, C., & Goldstein, H. (2005a). Changing compatibility of cohabitation and childbearing between young British women born in 1958 and 1970. Population Studies, 60(2), 137–152.CrossRef
Steele, F., Kallis, C., Goldstein, H., & Joshi, H. (2005b). The relationship between childbearing and transitions from marriage and cohabitation in Britain. Demography, 42(4), 647–673.CrossRef
Sweeney, M. M. (2010). The reproductive context of cohabitation in the United States: Recent change and variation in contraceptive use. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1155–1170.CrossRef
Syltevik, L. J. (2010). Sense and sensibility: cohabitation in ‘cohabitation land’. The Sociological Review, 58(3), 444–462.CrossRef
Teitler, J. O., Reichman, N. E., & Koball, H. (2006). Contemporaneous versus retrospective reports of cohabitation in the fragile families survey. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(2), 469–477.CrossRef
Testa, M. R. (2012). Family sizes in Europe: evidence from the 2011 Eurobarometer survey. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography.
Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward fertility issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 1009–1037.CrossRef
Vergauwen, J., Wood, J., & Neels, K. (2012). Quality of Demographic Data in GGS Wave 1. Stockholm: Paper presented at the European Population Conference.
Wiik, K. A., Bernhardt, E., & Noack, T. (2009). A study of commitment and relationship quality in Sweden and Norway. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 465–477.CrossRef
Wu, L., & Musick, K. (2008). Stability of marital and cohabiting unions following a first birth. Population Research and Policy Review, 27(6), 713–727.CrossRef
- How Similar are Cohabiting and Married Parents? Second Conception Risks by Union Type in the United States and Across Europe
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
European Journal of Population
Volume 30, Issue 4 , pp 437-464
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- United States
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Reader in Demography, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Bldg 58, Room, 2067, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK