Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of measurement error on the strength of concentration-response relationships in aquatic toxicology

  • Published:
Ecotoxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect that measurement error of predictor variables has on regression inference is well known in the statistical literature. However, the influence of measurement error on the ability to quantify relationships between chemical stressors and biological responses has received little attention in ecotoxicology. We present a common data-collection scenario and demonstrate that the relationship between explanatory and response variables is consistently underestimated when measurement error is ignored. A straightforward extension of the regression calibration method is to use a nonparametric method to smooth the predictor variable with respect to another covariate (e.g., time) and using the smoothed predictor to estimate the response variable. We conducted a simulation study to compare the effectiveness of the proposed method to the naive analysis that ignores measurement error. We conclude that the method satisfactorily addresses the problem when measurement error is moderate to large, and does not result in a noticeable loss of power in the case where measurement error is absent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cai Z, Naik PA, Tsai CL (2000) De-noised least squares estimators: an application to estimating advertisement effectiveness. Statist Sinica 10:1231–1243

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA, Crainiceanu CM (2006) Measurement error in nonlinear models: a modern perspective. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng C-L, van Ness JW (1999) Statistical regression with measurement error. Oxford University Press Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements WH (2004) Small-scale experiments support causal relationships between metal contamination and macroinvertebrate community responses. Ecol Appl 14:954–967. doi:10.1890/03-5009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements WH, Carlisle DM, Lazorchak JM, Johnson PC (2000) Heavy metals structure benthic communities in Colorado mountain streams. Ecol Appl 10:626–638. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0626:HMSBCI]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui H, He X, Zhu L (2002) On regression estimators with de-noised variables. Statist Sinica 12:1191–1205

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Gijbels I (1996) Local polynomial modeling and its applications. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller W (1987) Measurement error models. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Green PJ, Silverman BW (1993) Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models: a roughness penalty approach. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimick DA, Gammons CH, Cleasby TE, Madison JP, Skaar D, Brick CM (2003) Diel cycles in dissolved metal concentrations in streams: occurrence and possible causes. Water Resour Res 39:1247–1263. doi:10.1029/2002WR001571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppert D, Wand MP, Carroll RJ (2003) Semiparametric regression. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan LL (2007) Effects of measurement error on inferences of environmental conditions. J N Am Benthol Soc 26:152–163. doi:10.1899/0887-3593(2007)26[152:EOMEOI]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the comments and insights made by two anonymous referees. This research was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency STAR Program, grant #R832441, the National Science Foundation, IGERT grant #DGE-0221595, and National Science Foundation grant #DMS-0706761. This manuscript has not been formally reviewed by the EPA or NSF. The views expressed here are solely those of the authors. The EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek L. Sonderegger.

Appendix: R code for the bootstrap procedures used to calculate confidence intervals for the de-noising procedure.

Appendix: R code for the bootstrap procedures used to calculate confidence intervals for the de-noising procedure.

# Assuming X,Y,time vectors are defined

library(‘SemiPar’) # for the smoothing function ‘spm’

n < - length(X) # number of observations

# Find the smoothed CCU

model.spm < - spm(X ~ f(time));

smoothed.X < - model.spm$fit$fitted;

# Fit the regression of Y onto smoothed X

model.dn < - lm(Y ~ smoothed.X);

Y.hat < - model.dn$fitted;

# Find the estimated values of epsilons and deltas

e < - Y - model.dn$fitted.values;

d < - X - smoothed.X;

# Bootstrap from e,d

bootstrap.slope < - rep(NA, 1000);

for(i in 1:10000){

index1 < - sample(1:n, n, replace = T);

index2 < - sample(1:n, n, replace = T);

X.boot < - smoothed.X + d[index1];

Y.boot < - Y.hat + e[index2];

model.spm < - spm(X.boot ~ f(time));

smoothed.X < - model.spm$fit$fitted;

model < - lm(Y ~ smoothed.X);

bootstrap.slope[i] < - model$coefficients;

}

quantile(bootstrap.slope, p=c(0.025, 0.975));

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sonderegger, D.L., Wang, H., Huang, Y. et al. Effects of measurement error on the strength of concentration-response relationships in aquatic toxicology. Ecotoxicology 18, 824–828 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-009-0325-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-009-0325-2

Keywords

Navigation