Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring the Structure of the Illegal Market for Cannabis

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper explores the middle and retail levels of the illegal market for cannabis in New Zealand using national household drug survey data. Those who reported purchasing half or full ounces of cannabis were defined as middle level market participants, while those who purchased smaller weights or merely used cannabis were defined as retail level participants. Those who had purchased cannabis were then further categorised as either cannabis ‘buyers’ (i.e. those who only purchased sufficient cannabis for their own consumption needs) or cannabis ‘dealers’ based on whether the surplus of cannabis they had, after their own personal consumption was deducted, exceeded the legal definition of cannabis dealing (i.e. possession of 28 g of cannabis or more). Nine per cent of those who had purchased cannabis in the previous year were categorised as middle level participants with 69% of these defined as middle level dealers and 31% as middle level buyers. Middle level cannabis dealers were projected to earn, on average, $2927 (NZD) net annual profit from selling surplus (rate of return of 34%). There was a wide variation in the projected net earnings of the middle level cannabis dealers with the majority earning only modest incomes (bottom 50% – $260 per year, top 10% – $25000  per year). Participants at all levels of the market commonly reported receiving cannabis for ‘free’ and this is likely to reflect the social sharing of cannabis during group consumption and non-cash payments for cannabis. This barter and gift giving tradition may provide cannabis users with a degree of insulation from any price increases for cannabis brought about by law enforcement activity. Cannabis selling creates a convenient source of income for heavy cannabis users to finance their own personal cannabis consumption, which may also dampen the impact of any rise in price brought about by law enforcement success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashcroft J., Daniels D. and Hart S. (2001), ADAM Preliminary 2000 Findings on Drug Use & Markets: Adult Male Arrestees, Washington, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.

  • Australian Bureau of Criminal Intelligence (ABCI) (2001), Illicit Drugs in New Zealand: An Overview in Australian Illicit Drug Report 1999–2000, Canberra City, ACT.

  • Black S., Casswell S. (1993), Drugs in New Zealand: A Survey 1990, Auckland, Alcohol & Public Health Research Unit, University of Auckland.

  • Caulkins J.P., Reuter P. (1998), ‘What Price Data Tell us About Drug Markets’. Journal of Drug Issues 28(3): 593–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Caulkins J.P., Johnson B., Taylor A., Taylor L. (1999), ‘What Drug Dealers Tell us About Their Costs of Doing Business’. Journal of Drug Issues 29(2): 323–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorn N., Oette L., White S. (1998), ‘Drugs Importation and the Bifurcation of Risk’. British Journal of Criminology 38, 537–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field A. and Casswell S. (1999), Drugs in New Zealand: A National Survey 1998, Auckland, Alcohol and Public Health Research Unit, University of Auckland.

  • Jansen A.C.M. (2002), ‘The Economics of Cannabis Cultivation in Europe,’ Paper presented at the 2nd European Conference on Drug Trafficking and Law Enforcement, Paris.

  • Johnson B.D. (2003), ‘Patterns of Drug Distribution: Implications and Issues’. Substance Use and Misuse 18, 1789–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson B., Goldstein P., Preble E., Schmeidler J., Lipton D., Spunt B., Miller T. (1985), Taking Care of Business: The Economics of Crime by Heroin Users. Lexington MA, Lexington Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Long H.S. (1988), Getting Started in the Illicit Drug Business. Washington DC, Loompanics Unlimited

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCoun R., Reuter P. (2001), Drug War Heresies : Learning from Other Vices, Times, and Places. New York, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Makkai T. (2000), Drug Transactions: Some Results from the DUMA Project, In Australian Illicit Drug Report 1998–1999, Australian Bureau of Criminal Intelligence. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • McLauchlan M. (1996), Gone North: On the Cannabis Trail. North and South, November, pp.117–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore M. (1977), Buy and Bust, Lexington, MA D.C. Heath.

  • Preble E., Casey J. (1969), ‘Taking Care of Business – The Heroin User’s Life on the Street’. International Journal of Addictions 4, 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter P. (1985), The Organization of Illegal Markets: An Economic Analysis, Washington, DC, US, Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.

  • Reuter P., MacCoun R. and Murphy P. (1990), Money from Crime: A Study of the Economics of Drug Dealing in Washington DC CANY, Rand Corporation.

  • Staff B. (1988), A Report from Cannabis Country. North and South April, pp. 103–109

  • Statistics New Zealand (2005), Household Economic Survey Year ended 30 June 2004 – Hot Off The Press. 25 November. New Zealand Government Wellington <http://www.statistics.govt.nz>.

  • Taylor B. and Costa M. (2003), “Drug markets,” in: 2000 Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring: Annual Report. Washington, DC. National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice, Programs, US Department of Justice.

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2005), World Drug Report 2005 UNODC, Vienna <http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/world_drug_report. html>.

  • Walker L., Cocklin C., Blunden G. (1998), Cannabis Highs and Lows: Sustaining and Dislocating Rural Communities in Northland. Auckland, Department of Geography University of Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins C., Casswell S. Bhatta K., Pledger M. (2002a), Drug Use in New Zealand: National Surveys Comparison 1998 & 2001. Auckland Alcohol & Public Health Research Unit, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins C., Bhatta K., Casswell S. (2002b), ‘A Demand Side Estimate of the Financial Turnover of the Cannabis Black Market in New Zealand’. Drug and Alcohol Review 21, 145–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins C., Reilly J., Pledger M., Casswell S. (2005a), ‘Estimating the Dollar Value of the Illicit Market for Cannabis in New Zealand’. Drug and Alcohol Review 24(3): 227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins C, Girling M., Sweetsur P., Butler R. (2005b), Cannabis and Other Illicit Drug Trends in New Zealand, 2005, Massey Centre for Social and Health Outcomes Research and Evaluation & Te Ropu Whariki, Massey University.

  • Wilkins C., Reilly J., Casswell S. (2005c), ‘Cannabis ‘Tinny’ Houses in New Zealand, Implications for the use of Cannabis and Other Drugs in New Zealand’. Addiction 100, pp. 971–980

  • Yska R. (1990), New Zealand Green: The Story of Marijuana in New Zealand. Auckland, David Bateman

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Wilkins.

Additional information

The 2003 HBS-Drug Use was funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Health and carried out as part of the Public Health Intelligence (PHI) Health Behaviours Survey Monitor. The statistical design for the 2003 survey was completed by Dr. Megan Pledger at SHORE, and by James L. Reilly from Statistical-Insights. The questionnaire was adapted and extended from the National Drug Survey questionnaire for the Health Behaviours programme by Dr. Chris Wilkins. Data collection was managed by Dr. Chris Wilkins, Rachael Lane, Joe Morley and Mary Blade. The statistical analysis of 2003 HBS-Drug Use was completed by Paul Sweetsur. The analysis in this paper was partly funded by the New Zealand Police.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilkins, C., Sweetsur, P. Exploring the Structure of the Illegal Market for Cannabis. De Economist 154, 547–562 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-006-9029-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-006-9029-7

Keywords

JEL Code(s)

Navigation