Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Images of climate change – a pilot study of young people’s perceptions of ICT-based climate visualization

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate change can be difficult for laypeople to make sense of, because of its complexity, the uncertainties involved and its distant impacts. Research has identified the potentials of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) for visualizing and communicating climate change to lay audiences and thus addressing these communication challenges. However, little research has focused on how ICT-based visualization affects audiences’ understandings of climate change. Employing a semiotic framework and through a combination of focus group interviews and mindmap exercises, we investigated how Swedish students make sense of climate messages presented through an ICT-based visualisation medium; a dome theatre movie. The paper concludes that visualization in immersive environments works well to concretize aspects of climate change and provide a starting point for reflection, but we argue that the potential to add interactive elements should be further explored, as interaction has the potential to influence meaning-making processes. In addition, audiences’ preconceptions of climate change influence their interpretations of climate messages, which may function as a constraint to climate communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The digital dome theatre in the Norrköping visualization centre covers 165° of a sphere with a 15 m diameter with a total screen surface of approximately 300 square meters with six separate projectors, which enables the entire screen to be used for images, featuring a total resolution of 3710 × 3180 pixels. The production was based on the interactive 3D visualization software IceDome.

  2. As a service to the teachers and students, all students from the education program were invited to the dome presentation, not only those participating in the focus groups included in the study. In total, approximately 90 students visited the dome presentation.

References

  • Barthes R (1977) Image, music, text. Fontana Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brossard D, Lewenstein B (2009) A critical appraisal of models of public understanding of science: Using practice to inform theory. In: Kahlor L, Stout P (eds) Communicating science: New agendas in communication. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle J (2007) Picturing the clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the representational politics of climate change communication. Sci Cult 16:129–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eco U (1986) Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske J (2011) Introduction to communication studies. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser J, Heimlich J, Jacobsen J, Yocco V, Sickler J, Kisiel J, Nucci M, Jones L, Stahl J (2012) Giant screen film and science learning in museums. Int J Mus Manag Curator 27:179–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkier B (2008) Fokusgrupper. Samfundslitteratur, Frederiksberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe H, Smith N (2013) How the public engages with global warming: A social representations approach. Public Underst Sci 22:16–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnér B-O (2005) Att lära för överlevnad: utbildningsprogrammen och miljöfrågorna 1962 – 2002 [Learning for survival: educational programmes and environmental issues 1962-2002] Stiftelsen Etermedia i Sverige. Lund: Arkiv förlag

  • Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Glob Environ Chang 17(3-4):445–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe T, Brown K, Dessai S (2006) Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narratives and public perceptions of climate change. Public Underst Sci 15:435–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacEachren AM, Roth RE, O'Brien J, Li B, Swingley D, Gahegan M (2012) Visual semiotics and uncertainty visualization: an empirical study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18(12):2496–2505

  • Manzo K (2010) Beyond polar bears? Re-envisioning climate change. Meteorol Appl 17:196–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marková I, Grossen M, Linell P, Salazar OA (2007) Dialogue in Focus Groups: Exploring Socially Shared Knowledge. Equinox, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty S (1996) Abduction: A Theory of Visual Interpretation. Commun Theor 6(2):167–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser S (2010) Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. WIREs Clim Chang 1:31–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic N, Swart R (eds) (2000) Emission Scenarios. IPCC 2000 (pp. 570). Cambridge University Press, UK

  • Nerlich B, Jaspal R (2014) Images of Extreme Weather: Symbolising Human Responses to Climate Change. Science as Culture 23(2):253–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neset T-SS, Johansson J, Linnér B-O (eds) (2009) State of climate visualization. CSPR report 2009: 4

  • Nicholson-Cole S (2005) Representing climate change futures: a critique on the use of images for visual communication. Comput Environ Urban Syst 29:255–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet M, Scheufele D (2009) What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. Am J Bot 96:1767–1778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill SJ, Hulme M (2009) An iconic approach for representing climate change. Glob Environ Chang 19:402–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olausson U (2009) Global warming - global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public Underst Sci 18:421–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon N, Fischhoff B (2011) The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nat Clim Chang 1:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russil C, Nyssa Z (2009) The tipping point trend in climate change communication. Glob Environ Chang 19:336–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter JD, Campbell C, Journeay M, Sheppard SRJ (2009) The Digital Workshop: Exploring the Use of Interactive and Immersive Visualisation Tools in Participatory Planning. J Environ Manage 90:90–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider B (2012) Climate model simulation visualization from a visual studies perspective. WIREs Clim Chang 3:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenza JC, Ploubidis GB, George LA (2011) Climate change and climate variability: Personal motivation for adaptation and mitigation. Environ Health 10:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard SRJ (2012) Visualizing Climate Change. A Guide to Visual Communication of Climate Change and Developing Local Solutions. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard SRJ, Shaw A, Flanders D, Burch S, Wiek A, Carmichael J.,… Cohen S (2011) Future visioning of local climate change: A framework for community engagement and planning with scenarios and visualisation. Futures 43(4):400–412

  • Skolverket (2013) Curriculum for the upper secondary school. http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=2975

  • Spence A, Pidgeon NF (2010) Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Glob Environ Chang 20:656–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh L, Lorenzoni I (2010) Behaviour, perceptions, and communication of climate change. WIREs Clim Chang 1:158–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh L, O'Neill S, Lorenzoni I (2013) Public engagement with climate change: what do we know and where do we go from hhere? Int J Media Cult Polit 9(1):7–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wibeck V (2014a) Social representations of climate change in Swedish lay focus groups: local or distant, gradual or catastrophic? Public Underst Sci 23:204–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wibeck V (2014b) Enhancing learning, communication and public engagement about climate change – some lessons from recent literature. Environ Educ Res 20(3):387–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wibeck V, Öberg G, Abrandt-Dahlgren M (2007) Learning in focus groups: an analytical dimension for enhancing focus group research. Qual Res 7:249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wibeck V, Neset T-S, Linnér B-O (2013) Communicating climate change through ICT-based visualization: towards an analytical framework. Sustainability 5:4760–4777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf J, Moser S (2011) Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: insights from in-depth studies across the world. WIREs Clim Chang 2:547–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The preparation of this paper has been supported by a grant from the Swedish Research Council for the project “Making sense of climate change—a study of the formation and maintenance of social representations” (project no. 2008-1723) and by the Nordic Top-level Research Initiative through the Nordic Centre of Excellence for Strategic Adaptation Research (NORD-STAR). The authors wish to thank the students for participating in the focus group interviews, and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Gammelgaard Ballantyne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ballantyne, A.G., Wibeck, V. & Neset, TS. Images of climate change – a pilot study of young people’s perceptions of ICT-based climate visualization. Climatic Change 134, 73–85 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1533-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1533-9

Keywords

Navigation