Climatic Change

, Volume 86, Issue 1, pp 67–82

Parallels in reactionary argumentation in the US congressional debates on the abolition of slavery and the Kyoto Protocol

Open AccessArticle

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-007-9250-7

Cite this article as:
Davidson, M.D. Climatic Change (2008) 86: 67. doi:10.1007/s10584-007-9250-7


Today, the United States is as dependent on fossil fuels for its patterns of consumption and production as its South was on slavery in the mid-nineteenth century. That US congressmen tend to rationalise fossil fuel use despite climate risks to future generations just as Southern congressmen rationalised slavery despite ideals of equality is perhaps unsurprising, then. This article explores similarities between the rationalisation of slavery in the abolition debates and the rationalisation of ongoing emissions of greenhouse gases in the US congressional debates on the Kyoto Protocol.

Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Faculty of HumanitiesUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands