Skip to main content
Log in

Pragmatic Sustainability: Translating Environmental Ethics into Competitive Advantage

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, I propose a business paradigm that allows and enables the integration of environmental ethics into business decisions while creating a competitive advantage through the use of an ethical framework based on classical American pragmatism. Environmental ethics could be useful as an alternative paradigm for business ethics by offering new perspectives and methodologies to grant consideration of the natural environment. An approach based on classical American pragmatism provides a superior framework for businesses by focusing on experimentation and innovation, driving a long-term focus, and providing actionable clarity. Under a pragmatic approach to ethics, the choice for sustainability becomes self-evident for business performance and moral reasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • 3M: 2004, ‹2004 Annual Report’

  • Alexander, J. 2007. Environmental Sustainability Versus Profit Maximization: Overcoming Systemic Constraints on Implementing Normatively Preferable Alternatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(2): 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, G., A. Larson, M. White and J. York: 2008, ‹Sustainable EVA: Green Chemistry Links of Financial Analysis and Business Strategy’, in J. Stoner and C. Wankel (eds.), Innovative Approaches to Global Sustainability (Palgrave-Macmillan, New York, NY)

  • Aristotle. c. 330 B. C., 1999, Nicomachean Ethics (Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, Indiana) 2nd Edition (T. Irwin, Trans.)

  • Bartlett, R. A. 1995. Troubled Waters: Champion International and the Pigeon River Controversy. Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. 1789, 1982. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislations. Oxford University Press, New York

  • Clawson, J. G. 2003. Level Three Leadership: Getting Below the Surface. Upper Saddle Rive NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. 1994. Built to Last. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. 1997. How We Think. Dover Publication, New York

  • Dewey, J. 1934, 1998. Art as Experience. In L. A. Hickman, & T. M. Alexander (Eds.), The Essential Dewey: Pragmatism, Education, and Democracy, Vol. 1: 391–400. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Dewey, J. 1940, 1998. Nature in Experience. In L. A. Hickman, & T. M. Alexander (Eds.), The Essential Dewey: Pragmatism, Education, and Democracy, Vol. 1: 154–161. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Freeman, R. E., Pierce, J., & Dodd, R. H. 1999. Environmentalism and the New Logic of Business. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurdorf, C. E., & Hutchingson, J. E. 2003. Boundaries: A Casebook in Environmental Ethics. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. S. 1997. Value Creation, Net Present Value and Economic Profit. Charlottesville VA: The University of Virginia Darden School Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. 1896, 1997. The Will to Believe. In L. Menand (Ed.), Pragmatism: A Reader. Toronto: Random House.

  • Johnson, M.: 1997. ‹The Snow Goose Population Problem’. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Home Page

  • Kant, I. 1785, 1997. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Light. 1999. Environmental Pragmatism. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, A. 2001. The Urban Blind Spot in Environmental Ethics. Environmental Politics 10(1): 7–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menand, L. 1997. An Introduction to Pragmatism. In L. Menand (Ed.), Pragmatism: A Reader. Toronto: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. 1878, 1997. How to Make Our Ideas Clear. In L. Menand (Ed.), Pragmatism: A Reader: 26–48. Toronto: Random House.

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. 2006. Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev, 84(12): 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. 1995. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectivesq, 9(4): 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H. 2002. Value in Nature and the Nature of Value. In A. Light, & H. Rolston (Eds.), Environmental Ethics: An Anthology. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, S. B. 1986. Speculative Pragmatism. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, S. B., & Bucholz, R. A. 2000. Rethinking Business Ethics: A Pragmatic Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. 1995. The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4): 936–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P.: 2000, ‹Ecocentering Strategic Management’, Society for Business Ethics, Environmental Challenges to Business: Ruffin Series No. 2, pp. 23–43

  • Singer, P. 2001. Animal Liberation. Harper Perennial, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stead, J. G., & Stead, E. 2000. Eco-Enterprise Strategy: Standing for Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(4): 313–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations: 1999. ‹UNEP Global Environmental Outlook 2000’

  • United Nations: 2004. ‹UNEP Annual Report 2004’

  • van Marrewijk, M. 2003. Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2): 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford, UK: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welchman, J. 1999. The Virtues of Stewardship. Environmental Ethics, 21(4), 411–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard, B. 2002. The Sustainability Advantage: Seven Business Case Benefits for a Triple Bottom Line. Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author would like to gratefully acknowledge helpful comments received on an earlier draft of this paper by Willis Jenkins, Pat Werhane, and Stasi York and the support of the Batten Institute at the Darden Graduate School of Business in conducting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey G. York.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

York, J.G. Pragmatic Sustainability: Translating Environmental Ethics into Competitive Advantage. J Bus Ethics 85 (Suppl 1), 97–109 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9950-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9950-6

Keywords

Navigation