Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Breast cancer incidence by estrogen receptor status in Denmark from 1996 to 2007

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the past 50 years, breast cancer incidence has increased by 2–3 % annually. Despite many years of testing for estrogen receptors (ER), evidence is scarce on breast cancer incidence by ER status. The aim of this paper was to investigate the increase in breast cancer incidence by ER status. Data were obtained from the clinical database of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group which holds nationwide data on diagnosis, including pathology, treatment, and follow-up on primary breast cancers since 1977. All Danish women <80 years diagnosed with primary breast cancer 1996–2007 were identified in this prospective register based study. ER status was evaluated using immunohistochemical staining by standardized laboratory methods in the Danish Pathology Departments and reported to the database. From 1996 to 2007, breast cancer incidence increased overall with a tendency to level off after 2002. In all women a significant decrease was found in ER unknown tumors. However, in both pre- and postmenopausal women, significant increases were seen in incidence of ER+ tumors; though the increase levelled off for premenopausal women after 2002. In postmenopausal women, the incidence of ER− breast cancer decreased significantly throughout the period. In women <35 years, we found a minor non-significant increase in both ER+ and ER− tumors. ER unknown decreased in all women and was the most distinct in premenopausal women aged 35+. We found a significant increase in ER+ breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal women whereas the incidence in premenopausal women (aged 35+) levelled off after 2002.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ER:

Estrogen receptor

DBCG:

Danish Breast Cancer Group

IHC:

Immunohistochemical staining

HRT:

Hormone replacement therapy

APC:

Annual percentage rate change

References

  1. Lidegaard O, Kroman N (2005) The epidemiology of breast cancer. Eur Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1:24–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pujol P, Hilsenbeck SG, Chamness GC, Elledge RM (1994) Rising levels of estrogen receptor in breast cancer over 2 decades. Cancer 74(5):1601–1606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Li CI, Daling JR, Malone KE (2003) Incidence of invasive breast cancer by hormone receptor status from 1992 to 1998. J Clin Oncol 21(1):28–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Glass AG, Lacey JV Jr, Carreon JD, Hoover RN (2007) Breast cancer incidence, 1980–2006: combined roles of menopausal hormone therapy, screening mammography, and estrogen receptor status. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(15):1152–1161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson WF, Katki HA, Rosenberg PS (2011) Incidence of breast cancer in the United States: current and future trends. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(18):1397–1402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ravdin PM, Cronin KA, Howlader N, Berg CD, Chlebowski RT, Feuer EJ, Edwards BK, Berry DA (2007) The decrease in breast-cancer incidence in 2003 in the United States. N Engl J Med 356(16):1670–1674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jemal A, Ward E, Thun MJ (2007) Recent trends in breast cancer incidence rates by age and tumor characteristics among U.S. women. Breast Cancer Res 9(3):R28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cronin KA, Ravdin PM, Edwards BK (2009) Sustained lower rates of breast cancer in the United States. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117(1):223–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson WF, Reiner AS, Matsuno RK, Pfeiffer RM (2007) Shifting breast cancer trends in the United States. J Clin Oncol 25(25):3923–3929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (1997) Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer. Lancet 350(9084):1047–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford AA, Howard BV, Johnson KC, Katchen JM (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288(3):321–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chlebowski RT, Kuller LH, Prentice RL, Stefanick ML, Manson JE, Gass M, Aragaki AK, Ockene JK, Lane DS, Sarto GE, Rajkovic A, Schenken R et al (2009) Breast cancer after use of estrogen plus progestin in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 360(6):573–587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chlebowski RT, Anderson GL, Gass M, Lane DS, Aragaki AK, Kuller LH, Manson JE, Stefanick ML, Ockene J, Sarto GE, Johnson KC, Wactawski-Wende J et al (2010) Estrogen plus progestin and breast cancer incidence and mortality in postmenopausal women. JAMA 304(15):1684–1692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Beral V (2003) Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet 362(9382):419–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. von Euler-Chelpin M (2011) Breast cancer incidence and use of hormone therapy in Denmark 1978–2007. Cancer Causes Control 22(2):181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De P, Neutel CI, Olivotto I, Morrison H (2010) Breast cancer incidence and hormone replacement therapy in Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 102(19):1489–1495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lambe M, Wigertz A, Holmqvist M, Adolfsson J, Bardage C, Fornander T, Karlsson P, Odlind V, Persson I, Ahlgren J, Bergkvist L (2010) Reductions in use of hormone replacement therapy: effects on Swedish breast cancer incidence trends only seen after several years. Breast Cancer Res Treat 121(3):679–683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Renard F, Vankrunkelsven P, Van EL, Henau K, Boniol M, Autier P (2010) Decline in breast cancer incidence in the Flemish region of Belgium after a decline in hormonal replacement therapy. Ann Oncol 21(12):2356–2360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ewertz M, Duffy SW (1994) Incidence of female breast cancer in relation to prevalence of risk factors in Denmark. Int J Cancer 56(6):783–787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Althuis MD, Fergenbaum JH, Garcia-Closas M, Brinton LA, Madigan MP, Sherman ME (2004) Etiology of hormone receptor-defined breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(10):1558–1568

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fuglede N, Langballe O, Svendsen AL, Tjonneland A, Dalton SO, Johansen C (2006) Development in incidence of breast cancer in non-screened Danish women, 1973–2002—a population-based study. Int J Cancer 118(9):2366–2369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lokkegaard E, Lidegaard O, Moller LN, Agger C, Andreasen AH, Jorgensen T (2007) Hormone replacement therapy in Denmark, 1995–2004. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86(11):1342–1351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Talman ML, Rasmussen BB, Andersen J, Christensen IJ (2008) Estrogen Receptor analyses in the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. History, methods, prognosis and clinical implications. Acta Oncol 47(4):789–794

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Moller S, Jensen MB, Ejlertsen B, Bjerre KD, Larsen M, Hansen HB, Christiansen P, Mouridsen HT (2008) The clinical database and the treatment guidelines of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG); its 30-years experience and future promise. Acta Oncol 47(4):506–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN (2000) Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med 19(3):335–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. MacMahon B (2006) Epidemiology and the causes of breast cancer. Int J Cancer 118(10):2373–2378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Reeves GK, Pirie K, Green J, Bull D, Beral V (2009) Reproductive factors and specific histological types of breast cancer: prospective study and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 100(3):538–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lahmann PH, Hoffmann K, Allen N, van Gils CH, Khaw KT, Tehard B, Berrino F, Tjonneland A, Bigaard J, Olsen A, Overvad K, Clavel-Chapelon F et al (2004) Body size and breast cancer risk: findings from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Int J Cancer 111(5):762–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schutze M, Boeing H, Pischon T, Rehm J, Kehoe T, Gmel G, Olsen A, Tjonneland A-M, Dahm CC, Overvad K, Clavel-Chapelon F, Boutron-Ruault MC et al (2011) Alcohol attributable burden of incidence of cancer in eight European countries based on results from prospective cohort study. BMJ 342:d1584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang XR, Chang-Claude J, Goode EL, Couch FJ, Nevanlinna H, Milne RL, Goudet M, Schmidt MK, Broeks A, Cox A, Fasching PA, Hein R et al (2011) Associations of breast cancer risk factors with tumor subtypes: a pooled analysis from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(3):250–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ma H, Bernstein L, Pike MC, Ursin G (2006) Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk according to joint estrogen and progesterone receptor status: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Breast Cancer Res 8(4):R43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Katalinic A, Rawal R (2008) Decline in breast cancer incidence after decrease in utilisation of hormone replacement therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 107(3):427–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. DeSantis C, Howlader N, Cronin KA, Jemal A (2011) Breast cancer incidence rates in U.S. women are no longer declining. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20(5):733–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

These authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

This study was performed in agreement with the Ethical Committees on Human Studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Bigaard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bigaard, J., Stahlberg, C., Jensen, MB. et al. Breast cancer incidence by estrogen receptor status in Denmark from 1996 to 2007. Breast Cancer Res Treat 136, 559–564 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2269-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2269-0

Keywords

Navigation