Skip to main content
Log in

Gr39a, a Highly Diversified Gustatory Receptor in Drosophila, has a Role in Sexual Behavior

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sexual recognition among individuals is crucial for the reproduction of animals. In Drosophila, like in many other animals, pheromones are suggested to play an important role in conveying information about an individual, such as sex, maturity and mating status. Sex-specific cuticular hydrocarbon components are thought to be major sex pheromones in Drosophila, and are postulated to act through the gustatory system, since they are mostly non-volatile chemicals. However, very little is known about the molecular and neural bases of gustatory pheromone reception. So far, a few putative gustatory receptors, including Gr32a and Gr68a, have been implicated in courtship behavior. Here, we examine another putative gustatory receptor, Gr39a, which shares a cluster with both Gr32a and Gr68a in a molecular phylogeny of the gustatory receptor family, for its potential role in courtship behavior. The Gr39a gene produces four isoforms through alternative splicing of different 5′-most exons. A quantitative real-time PCR analysis showed that the expression levels of all four splice variants of Gr39a were reduced in a fly line in which a P element was inserted into the Gr39a locus. Homozygous and hemizygous males for the P-element insertion, as well as males in which Gr39a was knocked down by RNAi, all showed reduced courtship levels toward females. The courtship levels returned to normal when the P element was excised out. A close analysis of courtship behavior of the mutant males revealed that the average duration of a continuous courtship bout was significantly shorter in the mutants than in the wild type. The results suggest that Gr39a has a role in sustaining courtship behavior in males, possibly through the reception of a stimulating arrestant pheromone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amrein H, Thorne N (2005) Gustatory perception and behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Biol 15:R673–R684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antony C, Davis TL, Carlson DA, Pechiné JM, Jallon JM (1985) Compared behavioral responses of male Drosophila melanogaster (Canton S) to natural and synthetic aphrodisiacs. J Chem Ecol 11:1617–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellen HJ, Levis RW, Liao G, He Y, Carlson JW, Tsang G, Evans-Holm M, Hiesinger PR, Schulze KL, Rubin GM, Hoskins RA, Spradling AC (2004) The BDGP gene disruption project: single transposon insertions associated with 40% of Drosophila genes. Genetics 167:761–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bier E, Vaessin H, Shepherd S, Lee K, McCall K, Barbel S, Ackerman L, Carretto R, Uemura T, Grell E, Jan LY, Jan YN (1989) Searching for pattern and mutation in the Drosophila genome with a P-lacZ vector. Genes Dev 3:1273–1287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Billeter JC, Atallah J, Krupp JJ, Millar JG, Levine JD (2009) Specialized cells tag sexual and species identity in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 461:987–991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bray S, Amrein H (2003) A putative Drosophila pheromone receptor expressed in male-specific taste neurons is required for efficient courtship. Neuron 39:1019–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan PA, Zufall F (2006) Pheromonal communication in vertebrates. Nature 444:308–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clyne PJ, Warr CG, Carlson JR (2000) Candidate taste receptors in Drosophila. Science 287:1830–1834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb M, Jallon JM (1990) Pheromones, mate recognition and courtship stimulation in the Drosophila melanogaster species sub-group. Anim Behav 39:1058–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne JA, Crittenden AP, Mah K (1994) Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265:1461–1464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dahanukar A, Lei YT, Kwon JY, Carlson JR (2007) Two Gr genes underlie sugar reception in Drosophila. Neuron 56:503–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dietzl G, Chen D, Schnorrer F, Su KC, Barinova Y, Fellner M, Gasser B, Kinsey K, Oppel S, Scheiblauer S, Couto A, Marra V, Keleman K, Dickson BJ (2007) A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature 448:151–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunipace L, Meister S, McNealy C, Amrein H (2001) Spatially restricted expression of candidate taste receptors in the Drosophila gustatory system. Curr Biol 11:822–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ejima A, Griffith LC (2008) Courtship initiation is stimulated by acoustic signals in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 3:e3246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferveur JF (1997) The pheromonal role of cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila melanogaster. BioEssays 19:353–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferveur JF (2005) Cuticular hydrocarbons: their evolution and roles in Drosophila pheromonal communication. Behav Genet 35:279–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferveur JF, Sureau G (1996) Simultaneous influence on male courtship of stimulatory and inhibitory pheromones produced by live sex-mosaic Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 263:967–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner A, Barker D, Butlin RK, Jordan WC, Ritchie MG (2008) Evolution of a complex locus: exon gain, loss and divergence at the Gr39a locus in Drosophila. PLoS One 3:e1513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan RJ (1995) Understanding the genetic construction of behavior. Sci Am 272:72–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haerty W, Jagadeeshan S, Kulathinal RJ, Wong A, Ravi Ram K, Sirot LK, Levesque L, Artieri CG, Wolfner MF, Civetta A, Singh RS (2007) Evolution in the fast lane: rapidly evolving sex-related genes in Drosophila. Genetics 177:1321–1335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall JC (1994) The mating of a fly. Science 264:1702–1714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jallon JM (1984) A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship and mating. Behav Genet 14:441–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanzaki R, Ikeda A, Shibuya T (1994) Morphological and physiological properties of pheromone-triggered flipflopping descending interneurons of the male silkworm moth, Bombyx mori. J Comp Physiol A 175:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koganezawa M, Haba D, Matsuo T, Yamamoto D (2010) The shaping of male courtship posture by lateralized gustatory inputs to male-specific interneurons. Curr Biol 20:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krstic D, Boll W, Noll M (2009) Sensory integration regulating male courtship behavior in Drosophila. PLoS One 4:e4457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lacaille F, Hiroi M, Twele R, Inoshita T, Umemoto D, Manière G, Marion-Poll F, Ozaki M, Francke W, Cobb M, Everaerts C, Tanimura T, Ferveur JF (2007) An inhibitory sex pheromone tastes bitter for Drosophila males. PLoS One 2:e661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Y, Moon SJ, Montell C (2009) Multiple gustatory receptors required for the caffeine response in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:4495–4500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin DM, Goodman CS (1994) Ectopic and increased expression of Fasciclin II alters motoneuron growth cone guidance. Neuron 13:507–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuo T (2008) Rapid evolution of two odorant-binding protein genes, obp57d and obp57e, in the Drosophila melanogaster species group. Genetics 178:1061–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuo T, Sugaya S, Yasukawa J, Aigaki T, Fuyama Y (2007) Odorant-binding proteins Obp57d and Obp57e affect taste perception and host-plant preference in Drosophila sechellia. PLoS Biol 5:e118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto T, Amrein H (2008) Suppression of male courtship by a Drosophila pheromone receptor. Nat Neurosci 11:874–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moon SJ, Köttgen M, Jiao Y, Xu H, Montell C (2006) A taste receptor required for the caffeine response in vivo. Curr Biol 16:1812–1817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moon SJ, Lee Y, Jiao Y, Montell C (2009) A Drosophila gustatory receptor essential for aversive taste and inhibiting male-to-male courtship. Curr Biol 19:1623–1627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park IK, Lee HS, Lee SG, Park JD, Ahn YJ (2000) Antifeeding activity of isoquinoline alkaloids identified in Coptis japonica roots against Hyphantria cunea (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) and Agelastica coerulea (Coleoptera: Galerucinae). J Econ Entomol 93:331–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson HM, Preston CR, Phillis RW, Johnson-Schlitz DM, Benz WK, Engels WR (1988) A stable genomic source of P element transposase in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 118:461–470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson HM, Warr CG, Carlson JR (2003) Molecular evolution of the insect chemoreceptor gene superfamily in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(Suppl2):14537–14542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savarit F, Sureau G, Cobb M, Ferveur JF (1999) Genetic elimination of known pheromones reveals the fundamental chemical bases of mating and isolation in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9015–9020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott K, Brady R Jr, Cravchik A, Morozov P, Rzhetsky A, Zuker C, Axel R (2001) A chemosensory gene family encoding candidate gustatory and olfactory receptors in Drosophila. Cell 104:661–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski MB (2010) Social interactions in “simple” model systems. Neuron 65:780–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaur SC, Wu CI (1997) Positive selection and the molecular evolution of a gene of male reproduction, Acp26Aa of Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 14:544–549

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vosshall LB, Stocker RF (2007) Molecular architecture of smell and taste in Drosophila. Annu Rev Neurosci 30:505–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wyckoff GJ, Wang W, Wu CI (2000) Rapid evolution of male reproductive genes in the descent of man. Nature 403:304–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zawistowski S, Richmond RC (1986) Inhibition of courtship and mating of Drosophila melanogaster by the male-produced lipid, cis-vaccenyl acetate. J Insect Physiol 32:189–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Kazuko Sawaguchi for her secretarial assistance, and the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center and Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center for the provision of fly strains. This work was supported by a Specially Promoted Research grant (1802012) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) to D.Y. and M.K., a KAKENHI grant (21770074) to M.K., funds from the Tohoku University Neuroscience Global Center of Excellence Program from MEXT to D.Y., and a grant from the Japan Sciences and Technology Agency (JST) in conjunction with the Strategic Japanese-French Cooperative Program to D.Y.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daisuke Yamamoto.

Additional information

Edited by Yong-Kyu Kim.

K. Watanabe and G. Toba contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 39 kb)

Fig. S1. Locomotor activity, and its relationship to courtship activity

. (A) The locomotor activity of Gr39ak05106 mutant males was significantly lower than that of Canton-S males. Here, locomotor activity was defined as the number of times the fly crossed a reference line in the middle of an assay chamber in a 1-min observation period. Values are shown as the means ± SEM. Student’s t-test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of difference (***, P < 0.001). (B) Correlations between locomotor and courtship activities were examined for Canton-S wild-type and Gr39ak05106 mutant males. The locomotor activity of each individual was plotted against the CI of the same individual. No correlation was detected between the locomotor and courtship activities in both genotypes. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were as follows: Canton-S (r = -0.094), Gr39ak05106 (r = -0.218). The same data set of locomotor activities was used for both (A) and (B). In both (A) and (B), the numbers of males examined were as follows: Canton-S (n = 17), Gr39ak05106 (n = 27). (EPS 437 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, K., Toba, G., Koganezawa, M. et al. Gr39a, a Highly Diversified Gustatory Receptor in Drosophila, has a Role in Sexual Behavior. Behav Genet 41, 746–753 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-011-9461-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-011-9461-6

Keywords

Navigation