Skip to main content
Log in

Variations of the specific barrier model—part II: effect of isochron distributions

  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The specific barrier model (SBM) is a particular case of a composite earthquake source model where the seismic moment is distributed in a deterministic manner on a rectangular fault plane on the basis of moment and area constraints. It is assumed that the fault surface is composed of an aggregate of subevents of equal diameter, the ‘barrier interval’. Furthermore, the subevents are assumed to rupture randomly and statistically independent of one another as the rupture front sweeps the fault plane. In the formulation of the far-field source spectrum of the SBM the ‘arrival time’ of the seismic radiation emitted by each subevent is specified via a probability density function (PDF). In the SBM the subevents are assumed to be of equal sizes (an assumption relaxed in a companion paper, referred to as Part I) and the PDF of ‘arrival times’ is assumed to be uniform. In this study we investigate the effects of different PDFs of ‘arrival times’ on the far-field source spectrum of the SBM. Different PDFs of ‘arrival times’ affect the source spectra primarily at the intermediate frequency range (between the first and second corner frequencies). Such effects become more pronounced as the earthquake magnitude increases. The far-field spectrum of seismic energy observed/recorded at a site depends on the location of the site relative to the causative fault plane, the location of rupture initiation (hypocenter) and the onset times of the rupturing subevents. All the above factors are effectively taken into account by the ‘isochrons’, which vary with source-site geometry. We investigate the selection of the appropriate PDF of seismic energy arrival times at a given site by computing isochrons for a grid of stations surrounding the earthquake fault, represented by the SBM. We show that only for stations located in a direction normal to the fault plane is the assumption of uniform PDF of ‘arrival times’ valid. At other sites non-uniform PDFs of ‘arrival times’ are observed. We identify and categorize the prevalent types of PDFs by directivity (forward vs. backward vs. neutral) and source-site distance (near-fault vs. far-field), show examples in which we group the stations accordingly. We investigate the effects of the different PDF-groups on the SBM source spectrum. Selection of the appropriate PDF for a given source-site configuration when simulating strong ground motions using the SBM in the context of the stochastic method is expected to yield more self-consistent, and physically realistic simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aki K (1967) Scaling Law of seismic spectrum. J Geophys Res 72(4): 1217–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aki K, Papageorgiou AS (1988) Separation of source and site effects in acceleration power spectra of major California earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 9th world conference on Earthquake Engingeering, pp 163–165

  • Aki K, Richards PG (1980) Quantitative seismology. Theory and methods. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport WB (1970) Probability and random processes: an introduction for applied scientists and engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas J (2010) Consistency of ground-motion predictions from the past four decades. Bull Earthq Eng 8(6): 1515–1526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshelby JD (1957) The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 241(1226): 376–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster KM, Halldorsson B, Green RA, Chapman MC (2012) Calibration of the specific barrier model to the NGA dataset. Seism Res Lett (in press)

  • Frankel A (1991) High-frequency spectral falloff of earthquakes, fractal dimension of complex rupture, b value, and the scaling of strength on faults. J Geophys Res 96(B4): 6291–6302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gusev AA (1983) Descriptive statistical model of earthquake source radiation and its application to an estimation of short-period strong motion. Geophys J R Astron Soc 74(3): 787–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Halldorsson B, Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS (2011) Near-fault and far-field strong ground motion simulation for earthquake engineering applications using the specific barrier model. J Struct Eng 137(3): 433–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halldorsson B, Ólafsson S, Sigbjörnsson R (2007) A fast and efficient simulation of the far-fault and near-fault earthquake ground motions associated with the june 17 and 21, 2000, earthquakes in South Iceland. J Earthquake Eng 11(3): 343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halldorsson B, Papageorgiou AS (2005) Calibration of the specific barrier model to earthquakes of different tectonic regions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(4): 1276–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halldorsson B, Papageorgiou AS (2012) Variations of the specific barrier model—part I: effect of subevent size distributions. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-012-9344-0

  • Housner GW (1947) Characteristics of strong-motion earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 37(1): 19

    Google Scholar 

  • Housner GW (1955) Properties of strong ground motion earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 45(3): 197–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner WB, Boore DM (1986) On simulating large earthquakes by Green’s function addition of smaller earthquakes. In: Das S (ed) Earthquake source mechanics. Maurice Ewing series. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 269–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Keilis-Borok VI (1959) On the estimation of the displacement in an earthquake source and of source dimensions. Ann Geo 12: 205–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin YK (1967) Probabilistic theory of structural dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin YK, Cai G-Q (1995) Probabilistic structural dynamics: advanced theory and applications. McGraw-Hill Professional, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS (2003) A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(3): 1099–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton D (1960) An introduction to statistical communication theory 1987th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou AS (1988) On two characteristic frequencies of acceleration spectra: patch corner frequency and fmax. Bull Seismol Soc Am 78(2): 509–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou AS (2003) The barrier model and strong ground motion. Pure App Geophy 160(3): 603–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou AS, Aki K (1983a) A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion. I. Description of the model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73(3): 693–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou AS, Aki K (1983b) A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion. Part II. Applications of the model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73(4): 953–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou AS, Aki K (1985) Scaling law of far-field spectra based on observed parameters of the specific barrier model. Pure Appl Geophys 123(3): 353–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papoulis A (1965) Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice SO (1944) Mathematical analysis of random noise. Bell Syst Tech J 23: 282–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice SO (1945) Mathematical analysis of random noise. Bell Syst Tech J 24: 46–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato T, Hirasawa T (1973) Body wave spectra from propagating shear cracks. J Phys Earth 21: 415–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver P (1983) Retrieval of source-extent parameters and the interpretation of corner frequency. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73(6A): 1499–1511

    Google Scholar 

  • Spudich P, Frazer LN (1984) Use of ray theory to calculate high-frequency radiation from earthquake sources having spatially variable rupture velocity and stress drop. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74(6): 2061–2082

    Google Scholar 

  • Trifunac MD, Brune JN (1970) Complexity of energy release during the Imperial Valley, California, earthquake of 1940. Bull Seismol Soc Am 60(1): 137–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallée M, Bouchon M (2004) Imaging coseismic rupture in far field by slip patches. Geophys J Int 156(3): 615–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennerberg L (1990) Stochastic summation of empirical Green’s functions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 80(6A): 1418–1432

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyss M, Brune JN (1967) The Alaska earthquake of 28 March 1964: a complex multiple rupture. Bull Seismol Soc Am 57(5): 1017–1023

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedikt Halldorsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halldorsson, B., Papageorgiou, A.S. Variations of the specific barrier model—part II: effect of isochron distributions. Bull Earthquake Eng 10, 1321–1337 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9345-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9345-z

Keywords

Navigation