Abstract
We analyze 91,742 reported extragalactic distance moduli and their one sigma uncertainties for 14,560 galaxies with multiple reported distances in the NED Redshift-Independent Distances database. For every ordered pair of distance moduli measurements 1 and 2 for each galaxy, we define \(\Delta (\sigma )_{1,2}\), a measure for how different measurement 2 is in relation to measurement 1, as a multiple of the reported one sigma uncertainty in measurement 1. For a given set of distance moduli measurements, we take a mean of all such \(\Delta (\sigma )_{1,2}\) to determine the average separation between distance moduli of any galaxy in the set as a multiple of the reported uncertainty. For normally distributed measurements, the expected value of mean \(\Delta (\sigma )\) is 0.79. Our results are as follows. The mean \(\Delta (\sigma )\) of 1,239,062 ordered pairs of extragalactic distance moduli for 14,560 galaxies is 2.07 corresponding to a p-value of 3.85%. This indicates a possible systematic underestimation of uncertainties in extragalactic distances. We also find that the mean reported one sigma uncertainty decreased and the mean \(\Delta (\sigma )\) increased from 1989 to 2018. This points to increased underestimation of uncertainties with time. For the latest period from 2014 to 2018 with 14,580 reported extragalactic distance moduli for 5,406 galaxies, the mean \(\Delta (\sigma )\) of 40,462 ordered pairs is 3.00 corresponding to a p-value of 0.27%. For 14,888 extragalactic distance moduli of 2,518 galaxies measured using Type Ia Supernovae, the mean \(\Delta (\sigma )\) for 124,016 ordered pairs is 2.85 corresponding to a p-value of 0.44%. These results may have some implications for our confidence in cosmological parameters and models. We conclude that more liberal estimation of uncertainties in future reported extragalactic distances should be considered. The results also give a possible way out of the Hubble-Lemaitre tension by advocating for increasing the error bars on Hubble-Lemaitre constant measured via distance ladders of standard candles and rulers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Some of the data underlying this article are available in the NED Redshift-Independent Distances database at http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/Library/Distances/. Rest of the data underlying this article are available in the article and the appendix.
Code Availability
The code is released open source under the MIT license at https://github.com/RiteshSingh/galaxydistance.
References
Chaparro-Molano, G., Cuervo, J.C., Restrepo Gaitán, O.A., Torres Arzayús, S.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485(3), 4343 (2019)
Chen, G.C.-F., Fassnacht, C.D., Suyu, S.H., Rusu, C.E., Chan, J.H.H., Wong, K.C., Auger, M.W., Hilbert, S., Bonvin, V., Birrer, S., Millon, M., Koopmans, L.V.E., Lagattuta, D.J., McKean, J.P., Vegetti, S., Courbin, F., Ding, X., Halkola, A., Jee, I., Shajib, A.J., Sluse, D., Sonnenfeld, A., Treu, T.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490(2), 1743 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2547
Chen, S.: APS News 27(5) (2018)
Crane, L.: New Sci. 3255 (2019)
Czerny, B., Beaton, R., Bejger, M., Cackett, E., Dall’Ora, M., Holanda, R.F.L., Jensen, J.B., Jha, S.W., Lusso, E., Minezaki, T., Risaliti, G., Salaris, M., Toonen, S., Yoshii, Y.: Space Sci. Rev. 214(1), 32 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-018-0466-9
Di Valentino, E., Melchiorri, A., Silk, J.: Nat. Astron. 4(2), 196 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0906-9
Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., Visinelli, L., Yang, W., Melchiorri, A., Mota, D.F., Riess, A.G., Silk, J.: Class. Quantum Gravity 38(15), 153001 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d
Gonzalez, G.: Evolution News (2019)
Ivanov, M.M., Ali-Haïmoud, Y., Lesgourgues, J.: Phys. Rev. D 102(6), 063515 (2020)
Jackson, N.: Living Rev. Relativ. 18(1), 2 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/lrr-2015-2
Jacoby, G.H., Branch, D., Ciardullo, R., Davies, R.L., Harris, W.E., Pierce, M.J., Pritchet, C.J., Tonry, J.L., Welch, D.L.: Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 104(678), 599 (1992)
Krisciunas, K., DeBenedictis, E., Steeger, J., Bischoff-Kim, A., Tabak, G., Pasricha, K.: Am. J. Phys. 80(5), 429 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3687924
Krishnan, C., Ó Colgáin, E., Sheikh-Jabbari, M.M., Yang, T.: Phys. Rev. D 103(10), 103509 (2021)
Kurtz, M.J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C.S., Murray, S.S., Watson, J.M.: Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 143(1), 41 (2000)
Poulin, V.: In: Concordances and Challenges in Cosmology After Planck, Sexten/Sesto, Italy (2019)
Rameez, M., Sarkar, S.: Class. Quantum Gravity 38(15), 154005 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac0f39
Riess, A.G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., Macri, L.M., Scolnic, D.: Astrophys. J. 876(1), 85 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab1422
Rowan-Robinson, M.: The Cosmological Distance Ladder. WH Freeman, New York (1985)
Rowan-Robinson, M.: Space Sci. Rev. 48(1–2), 1–71 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183129
Rowan-Robinson, M.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 332(2), 352 (2002)
Rowan-Robinson, M.: Astron. Geophys. 49(3), 3 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4004.2008.49330.x
Sivaram, C., Arun, K., Rebecca, L.: Indian J. Phys. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-021-02080-7
Sloman, L.: Sci. Am. (2019)
Steer, I., Madore, B.F., Mazzarella, J.M., Schmitz, M., Corwin, H.G., Chan, B.H.P., Ebert, R., Helou, G., Baker, K., Chen, X., Frayer, C., Jacobson, J., Lo, T., Ogle, P., Pevunova, O., Terek, S.: Astron. J. 153(1), 37 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/153/1/37
Steer, I., Mazzarella, J., Madore, B.F., Randall, M., Schmitz, M.: Mean distances for galaxies with redshift-independent estimates in NED. 233, 409 (2019). ADS Bibcode: 2019AAS...23340901S
Acknowledgements
We thank Stephan Kolassa, Semoi, and James K on stackexchange.com. We deeply thank Ian Steer, the anonymous Reviewer 1, and the Editor, who were more impactful to this work than the author. We also thank the Reviewers 2 and 3 for their most kind guidance in improving the article.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, R. Evidence for possible systematic underestimation of uncertainties in extragalactic distances and its cosmological implications. Astrophys Space Sci 366, 99 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-021-04006-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-021-04006-5