Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rectal Douching Prevalence and Practices Among Peruvian Men Who have Sex with Men and Transwomen: Implications for Rectal Microbicides

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peruvian men who have sex with men (MSM) and transwomen (TW) could benefit from a rectal microbicide (RM) formulated as a rectal douche to prevent HIV infection. However, little is known about rectal douching practices among Peruvian MSM and TW, information necessary to inform RM douche development and future uptake. Using a self-administered interview, we examined the prevalence of and factors associated with rectal douching among a convenience sample of 415 Peruvian MSM and 68 TW. In the previous 6 months, 18 % of participants reported rectal douching using pre-filled commercial kits or plastic bottles or enema bags filled with water, water/soap or saltwater. Multivariate logistic analysis found that “equally insertive and receptive” or “exclusively/mainly receptive” sex roles were associated with douche use. Rectal douching among Peruvian MSM and TW is similar to reports from other studies and supports the potential uptake of a douche-formulated RM in these populations.

Resumen

Los hombres que tienen sexo con otros hombres (HSH) y las mujeres transgénero (MT) peruanos podrían beneficiarse con microbicidas rectales (MR) formulados como una ducha rectal para prevenir la infección por VIH. Sin embargo, se conoce poco sobre las prácticas de duchas rectales entre HSH y MT en Perú, información necesaria para orientar el desarrollo de MR y su futura aceptación. Utilizando una entrevista auto-administrada, examinamos la prevalencia y los factores asociados con el uso de duchas rectales en una muestra por conveniencia de 415 HSH y 68 MT peruanos. En los seis meses recientes, 18% de los participantes reportaron haber usado duchas rectales comerciales pre-llenados o botellas de plástico o bolsas para enema llenas con agua, agua con jabón, o agua salada. El análisis multivariado encontró que los roles sexuales "igualmente insertivos o receptivos" o "exclusivamente/principalmente receptivos" estaban asociados con el uso de duchas rectales. El uso de duchas rectales entre HSH y MT es similar a lo reportado en otros estudios y da respaldo a la posible aceptación por parte de estas poblaciones de los MR formulados.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2587–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. McCormack S, Dunn D. Pragmatic open-label randomised trial of preexposure prophylaxis: the proud study [abstract 22LB]. Abstract presented at: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI); February 23–26, 2015; Seattle, Washington.

  3. Grant RM, Anderson PL, McMahan VM, et al. Uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis, sexual practices, and HIV incidence in men and transgender women who have sex with men: a cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(9):820–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Molina JM, Capitant C, Charreau I, Spire B et al. On demand PrEP With Oral TDF-FTC in MSM: results of the ANRS Ipergay trial [abstract 23LB]. Abstract presented at: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI); February 23–26, 2015; Seattle, Washington.

  5. Krakower DS, Mayer KH. Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV infection: current status, future opportunities and challenges. Drugs. 2015;75(3):243–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Peinado J, Lama JR, Galea JT, et al. Acceptability of oral versus rectal HIV preexposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men and transgender women in Peru. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2013;12(4):278–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gomez GB, Borquez A, Caceres CF, et al. The potential impact of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among men who have sex with men and transwomen in Lima, Peru: a mathematical modelling study. PLoS Med. 2012;9(10):e1001323.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Beyrer C, Sullivan P, Millett G, Sanchez J, et al. The increase in global HIV epidemics MSM. AIDS. 2013;27(17):2665–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Galea JT, Kinsler JJ, Imrie J, et al. Preparing for rectal microbicides: sociocultural factors affecting product uptake among potential South American users. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(6):e113–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Newman PA, Roungprakhon S, Tepjan S. A social ecology of rectal microbicide acceptability among young men who have sex with men and transgender women in Thailand. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013;1(16):18476.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pines HA, Gorbach PM, Weiss RE, et al. Acceptability of potential rectal microbicide delivery systems for HIV prevention: a randomized crossover trial. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(3):1002–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Carballo-Diéguez A, Exner T, Dolezal C, Pickard R, Lin P, Mayer KH. Rectal microbicide acceptability: results of a volume escalation trial. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34(4):224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kinsler JJ, Cunningham WE, Nureña CR, et al. Using conjoint analysis to measure the acceptability of rectal microbicides among men who have sex with men in four South American cities. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(6):1436–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Microbicide Trials Network. MTN-017: phase II safety and acceptability study of tenofovir gel reformulated for rectal use. http://www.mtnstopshiv.org/news/studies/mtn017/backgrounder. Accessed 5 June 2015.

  15. Javanbakht M, Murphy R, Gorbach P, LeBlanc MA, Pickett J. Preference and practices relating to lubricant use during anal intercourse: implications for rectal microbicides. Sex Health. 2010;7(2):193–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kinsler JJ, Galea JT, Peinado J, Segura P, Montano SM, Sánchez J. Lubricant use among men who have sex with men reporting receptive anal intercourse in Peru: implications for rectal microbicides as an HIV prevention strategy. Int J STD AIDS. 2010;21(8):567–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carballo-Diéguez A, Bauermeister JA, Ventuneac A, Dolezal C, Balan I, Remien RH. The use of rectal douches among HIV-uninfected and infected men who have unprotected receptive anal intercourse: implications for rectal microbicides. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(6):860–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Carballo-Diéguez A, Bauermeister J, Ventuneac A, Dolezal C, Mayer K. Why rectal douches may be acceptable rectal-microbicide delivery vehicles for men who have sex with men. Sex Trans Dis. 2010;37(4):228–33.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Galea JT, Kinsler JJ, Imrie J, Nureña CR, Sanchez J, Cunningham WE. Rectal douching and implications for rectal microbicides among populations vulnerable to HIV in South America: a qualitative study. Sex Transm Infect. 2014;90(1):33–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Noor SW, Rosser BR. Enema use among men who have sex with men: a behavioral epidemiologic study with implications for HIV/STI prevention. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(4):755–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Javanbakht M, Stahlman S, Pickett J, LeBlanc MA, Gorbach PM. Prevalence and types of rectal douches used for anal intercourse: results from an international survey. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Beyrer C, Baral SD, van Griensven F, et al. Global epidemiology of HIV infection in men who have sex with men. Lancet. 2012;380(9839):367–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Baral SD, Poteat T, Stromdahl S, Wirtz AL, Guadamuz TE, Beyrer C. Worldwide burden of HIV in transgender women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(3):214–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beyrer C, Baral SD, Walker D, Wirtz AL, Johns B, Sifakis F. The expanding epidemics of HIV type 1 among men who have sex with men in low- and middle-income countries: diversity and consistency. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32(1):137–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. MINSA [Peruvian Ministry of Health]. Informe nacional sobre los progresos realizados en el país [National report on progress made in the country]. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/en/dataanalysis/knowyourresponse/countryprogressreports/2014countries/PER_narrative_report_2014.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2015.

  26. UNAIDS Peru country report 2013. http://www.unaids.org/en/regionscountries/countries/peru. Accessed 5 June 2013.

  27. Kinsler JJ, Galea JT, Lama JR, et al. Rectal douching among Peruvian men who have sex with men, and acceptability of a douche-formulated rectal microbicide to prevent HIV infection. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89(1):62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown B, Davtyan M, Leon SR, et al. A prospective cohort study characterising the role of anogenital warts in HIV acquisition among men who have sex with men: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2014;4(9):e005687.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Schilder A, Orchard TR, Buchner CS, Strathdee SA, Hogg RS. Insert discourse: rectal douching among young HIV-positive and HIV-negative men who have sex with men in Vancouver. Can Sex Cult. 2010;14(4):327–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Anton P, Herold BC. HIV transmission: time for translational studies to bridge the gap. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(77):77ps11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Schmelzer M, Schiller LR, Meyer R, Rugari SM, Case P. Safety and effectiveness of large-volume enema solutions. Appl Nurs Res. 2004;17(4):265–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. de Vries HJ, van der Bij AK, Fennema JS, et al. Lymphogranuloma venereum proctitis in men who have sex with men is associated with anal enema use and high-risk behavior. Sex Trans Dis. 2008;35(2):203–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schreeder MT, Thompson SE, Hadler SC, et al. Hepatitis B in homosexual men: prevalence of infection and factors related to transmission. J Infect Dis. 1982;146(1):7–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ndimbie OK, Kingsley LA, Nedjar S, Rinaldo CR. Hepatitis C virus infection in a male homosexual cohort: risk factor analysis. Genitourin Med. 1996;72(3):213–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Heiligenberg M, Rijnders B, van der Loeff MFs, et al. High prevalence of sexually transmitted infections in HIV-infected men during routine outpatient visits in The Netherlands. Sex Trans Dis. 2012;39(1):8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Richel O, De Vries HJ, Dijkgraaf MG, Van Noesel CJ, Prins JM. Risk factors for the presence of anal intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV+ men who have sex with men. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e84030.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Galea JT, Kinsler JJ, Galan DB, et al. Factors associated with visible anogenital warts among HIV-uninfected Peruvian men who have sex with men and transwomen: a cross-sectional study. Sex Trans Dis. 2015;42(4):202–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Development of rectal enema as microbicide (DREAM). http://grantome.com/grant/NIH/U19-AI113127-01. Accessed 5 June 2015.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the men and women who participated in this study as well as the staff at the community center Epicentro in Lima, Peru where the study was conducted. This work was supported in part by a research grant from the Merck Investigator-Initiated Studies Program of Merck & Co., Inc., NIH grant T32 MH080634 and the NIH Health Disparities Research Loan Repayment Program. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Merck & Co., Inc. We also thank the International Rectal Microbicides Advocates (IRMA) who provided access to the global rectal douching survey and allowed its modification for use in the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerome T. Galea.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galea, J.T., Kinsler, J.J., McLean, S. et al. Rectal Douching Prevalence and Practices Among Peruvian Men Who have Sex with Men and Transwomen: Implications for Rectal Microbicides. AIDS Behav 20, 2555–2564 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1221-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1221-9

Keywords

Navigation